China has recently announced its 12th Five-Year Plan for national development. In an interview with Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) staff reporter
TT: Could you please analyze China’s 12th Five-Year Plan from a strategic viewpoint?
Chang Jung-feng (張榮豐): The “recommendations” in the Five-Year Plan are assessments of the strategic environment between this year and 2015 and of China’s current strengths and weaknesses.
This includes, first, an assessment on the external environment that states that peace, development and cooperation continue to be the current trends; second, the fact that the effects of the recent financial crisis are still around; third, that global growth is slowing down and that China therefore cannot merely rely on exports to drive its economic growth; fourth, intensifying market, skilled labor, technological and standards competition; and, fifth, the need to pay increasing attention to climate change, energy, resources and food safety.
China perceives its advantages to be, first, that the socialist political system gives China the advantage of being able to concentrate resources quicker in response to crises; second, that China has made strong inroads in terms of industrialization, the increased use of information technology, urbanization, marketization and internationalization; third, that the increase in GDP per capita has given China’s internal demand market much more potential and fourth, that the government’s macro-control abilities have gotten stronger.
China perceives its disadvantages to be first, that further limits need to be put on resources and the environment used in the process of economic development; second, that an imbalance has occurred between investment and consumption; third, that the proportion of resident income to national income is continuously falling; fourth, that China is not strong in terms of technological innovation; fifth, that the structure of China’s industries is not logical; sixth, that the foundations of agriculture are -being -weakened; seventh, that there is a gap in development in urban and rural areas, and eighth, that there are contradictions in overall employment and employment structures.
China has also set three hopes for the future: image, goals and core values.
When China faces a major strategic choice, their core values will become the main criteria for making decisions. These criteria include [former Chinese president] Deng Xiaoping’s (鄧小平) idea that “Development is the indisputable truth” (發展是硬道理), [former Chinese president] Jiang Zemin’s (江澤民) idea of the “Three represents” (三個代表) and [Chinese President] Hu Jintao’s (胡錦濤) “Scientific Development Concept” (科學發展觀).
As far as image is concerned, the first point deals with the image of economic development: The demand side should be driven by investment, consumption and exports, while the supply side should be driven by the agricultural, manufacturing and service sectors. The second point deals with the image of production methods: scientific advancement, a highly skilled work force and innovative management. The third point deals with the image that economic growth is equally shared by all citizens. The fourth point deals with the image of energy savings and environmental friendliness and the fifth point deals with the image of a socio--political system beneficial to technological developments and the equal sharing of opportunity.
Finally, the Five-Year Plan has five fixed goals: steady and faster economic development, strategic adjustments to the economy to encourage greater growth, a more widespread and faster increase in the incomes of rural and urban residents, a noticeable increase in infrastructure and increased reform and opening up.
TT: In concrete terms, what does China’s strategy consist of?
Chang: Although 10 major strategies are listed among the -recommendations and although there are accompanying action plans or concrete measures to each strategy, there is no time factor, which makes it impossible to detect a strategic path. Using abductive reasoning, I have found four important strategic paths leading up to the 12th Five-Year Plan. The key path, or the key strategic path, that we should pay attention to is the path that has been followed for the longest time. This path is key to controlling the timeline for implementing the overall strategy and that is why it is called the key strategic path.
This Five-Year Plan began with the Chinese Communist Party’s policy to speed up reform and perfect the socialist market economy.
The eight main reforms were, first, the creation of different kinds of economic ownership, legally regulating equality in the use of production factors, and fair participation in market competition; second, to deepen the reform of industrial monopolies; third, to perfect various management systems for state-owned assets and create a healthy operational budget and benefit distribution system for state-owned assets; fourth, to support and lead the development of the non-public economy and encouraging non--public enterprises to participate in the reform of state-owned enterprises; fifth, to create healthy land, capital, labor, technology and information factor markets; sixth, to deepen the reform of prices, factors of production and markets for strategic resources — water, energy, mining products, land; seventh, to smooth out the prices for coal, electricity, petroleum, air, water, mining resources; and eighth, to perfect the mechanisms for setting prices for important products, services and factors of production.
When evaluating these reforms, at least a year to two years is needed before we begin to see results.
However, two very important reforms are missing here, namely, the reform of the household registration system and the reform of the market for agricultural land. Due to the progress of the above-mentioned reforms, it is expected that the strategic plan to establish a mechanism aimed at expanding consumption will get under way around next year some time.
It is expected to bring about an increase in the first distribution of national income among urban and rural residents so they will get some pocket money to spend. That can be followed by the strategic strengthening of social construction and establishment of a healthy system for basic public services. The goal is to use government transfer payments to increase the income of urban and rural residents through a second distribution [of national income]. With their increased income, they can increase their consumption without having to worry about the consequences, such as retirement, health insurance and other such issues. There will also be basic guarantees for housing and their children’s education. Through these measures, they will create good consumption prospects, although this goal will probably not be realized until the second half of 2013 some time.
As the public gets money to spend and also dares spend it, the strategy to improve the consumption environment can be used to help increase spending. The increased spending among the public is then matched with the strategies to perfect the structure of foreign trade and to increase the use of foreign investments in order to produce equilibrium in the balance of payments and maintain reasonable investment growth and an optimized investment structure. Finally, these measures will adjust the economic growth model so that consumption, investment and exports work together to drive economic growth instead of the current model where economic growth is only driven by investment and exports.
To sum up, each link along this key strategic path poses a considerable challenge. The greatest challenge is two-fold: the state-owned enterprise monopolies controlled by high cadres and the privileges pertaining to the urban class as a result of the household registration system.
As to the development of seven strategic new industries, cadres at every level are very ambitious, which means that it will not be that difficult to reach the goals, although it will be more difficult to reach environmental, energy savings and technical skill benchmarks.
TT: Does China’s 12th Five-Year Plan mention it’s approach to Taiwan?
Chang: Based on the logic of strategic planning, the goal of the plan’s approach to Taiwan is to further promote the unification of the “motherland.” Since it is only a Five-Year Plan, the goal cannot be to complete the unification of the “motherland.” The core values of China’s approach to Taiwan are to insist on peaceful unification and “one country, two systems,” Jiang’s eight points, Hu’s six points and opposing Taiwanese separatist activities.
In terms of strategic direction, promoting the creation of a mechanism for cross-strait exchanges means to carry out negotiations and sign agreements that can serve as a starting point for its Taiwan-related work within the framework of the 12th Five-Year Plan. That work will then follow three directions, all moving toward the goal of unifying the “motherland.”
The first direction is to promote bilateral investments, let the western coast of the Taiwan Strait function as a test bed, and guarantee the legitimate rights of Taiwanese people as required by law, while strengthening cross-strait cooperation in new industries, the financial industry and other modern service industries in order to create the image that the goals of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement [ECFA] are being implemented and that cross-strait economic cooperation is being consolidated. The second direction is to expand exchanges between different sectors and strengthen cooperation in non-economic areas, which is the reason for the calls for a cultural ECFA.
The third direction is to build a framework for peaceful development, which is the reason behind the calls for a peace agreement. These three directions are then joined together in a push for unification of the “motherland.”
TT: President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration keeps talking about peaceful development in its China policies, while the [ideas in China’s] 12th Five-Year Plan has become the new prevailing idea. What are your views on this?
Chang: No one will reject talk about peaceful development, but from a strategic perspective, the main thing is the ultimate goal. It is very clear that while the framework for peaceful development in the 12th Five-Year Plan talks about peace, it is in practice aimed at promoting unification. Some people currently have too high an expectation of a peace agreement, but everyone who has studied game theory understands that the signing of a peace agreement and a promise to turn arms into plow shares will be the first step toward war or surrender.
As far as Taiwan is concerned, the plan will not only bring opportunity, it will also bring threats.
Our problem is that without any thorough analysis of the plan’s strategic directions and without clearly understanding our own industrial strategies or goals, we are creating blind hope and have simply become tools of stock market manipulation. This is the real problem created by the 12th Five-Year Plan becoming the prevailing idea.
TT: Based on your deep knowledge of strategic principles and of the Five-Year Plan, how do you view the Ma administration’s “Golden Decade project (黃金十年計畫),” which it said would soon be revealed?
Chang: China’s Five-Year Plan has basically been developed based on strategic thinking, through 11 stages and studies of more than 160 different topics over about one year and 10 months. Japan’s strategic plan, called “A new growth strategy — a return to Japanese vitality,” was led by former Japanese prime minister Yukio Hatoyama, and it took more than half a year to create that plan.
Some Chinese Taiwan experts have said that based on their own studies of past Taiwanese plans, be it the Asia-Pacific logistic hub plan (亞太營運中心), the Asia-Pacific -capital-raising plan (亞太籌資中心), the six key emerging industries plan (六大新興產業) or the four major knowledge-based industries (四大智慧型產業) plan, have all been mere slogans. I hope Ma’s “Golden Decade project” is a tight strategic plan and not a temporary slogan thought up by a small group of people.
‘CROCODILE TEARS’: The Taiwan Statebuilding Party said the Kaohsiung mayor was only apologizing after a poll revealed that 45% of the city’s residents favored a recall Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) at a city council session yesterday apologized for taking three months off last year to campaign for January’s presidential election. Han said that he was now prioritizing municipal affairs and was focused primarily on preventing the spread of COVID-19. He was “doing two days’ work each day” to make up for time lost, he said. Han on May 5 attended a city council session for the first time in 201 days, giving a report on pandemic response measures. At yesterday’s session, Han said the Kaohsiung City Government would be injecting NT$50 million (US$1.67 million) into the
Taipei City Councilor Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶) on Saturday urged the Taipei Department of Cultural Affairs to designate the Japanese colonial-era Showa Building (昭和樓) a cultural heritage site to protect it from being demolished. Wu made the remarks after the department on Tuesday last week visited the building to evaluate it for preservation, a standard procedure before a public building that is more than 50 years old is razed. The Showa Building, on Zhongxiao E Road Sec 2, was a rare kind of office building when it was constructed in 1942, Wu said. The three-story building was built with reinforced concrete and has European-style
A proposal by the Taiwan Railways Administration (TRA) to permanently ban sitting in Taipei Railway Station’s main hall has received a mixed reaction online, with some social media users vowing to launch a sit-in at the station. Gatherings at the hall have been prohibited since Feb. 29 in accordance with the Central Epidemic Command Center’s policy of reducing crowd sizes in public places. A Facebook user organizing the sit-in said that the hall is a public space and there is no legitimate reason to ban sitting on the floor. He said he suspected that the proposal was made due to business considerations and
Chinese over-the-top (OTT) service provider iQiyi cannot register as a provider in Taiwan after the Mainland Affairs Council declared it to be an illegal service, the National Communications Commission (NCC) said yesterday. Both iQiyi and WeTV were deemed to be illegal Chinese OTT operators in an interdepartmental meeting on Friday last week, officials said, adding that this prohibits them from marketing their services in Taiwan or seeking subscribers. The government plans to block a local server that iQiyi has been using to transmit content to domestic audiences, which would disrupt its content transmission. OTT Entertainment Ltd, which is enlisted by iQiyi to