As the new Tobacco Hazard Prevention and Control Act (菸害防制法) took effect yesterday, which introduced strict bans on smoking in public places for the first time, universities around the nation geared up to create a smoke-free environment.
Under the new regulations, smoking is not allowed in a university’s indoor or outdoor facilities.
That means anyone — students and teachers alike — lighting up a cigarette in libraries, school buildings, teacher’s lounges, professors’ offices or on track fields are now subject to a fine of between NT$2,000 (US$60) and NT$10,000.
PHOTO: AP
Some schools with large campus’ chose to establish smoking areas for the schools’ smoking population.
But as the Act stipulates, these areas must be located in less frequented parts of the campus, which would make it less convenient for smokers to satisfy their nicotine craving.
National Chengchi University (NCCU), for example, has only designated 11 areas for smokers on its 103-hectare campus, the majority of which were relatively “remote areas” compared to the school’s main campus facilities.
Smokers are only allowed to puff, for instance, at the right side of the plaza on the third floor of the International Building or beneath the front stairs of the Jitao Building — areas where fewer students hang out after class.
For Fu Jen Catholic University (FJU), there will only be six smoking areas among its 44.25-hectare campus.
Again, the areas are either behind a building or away from the campus’ main passageways.
Unlike other universities, central Taiwan’s National Changhua University of Education chose to completely ban smoking on campus although about 3 percent of the school’s freshmen smoked, university president Chang Hui-po (張惠博) said.
Shih Hsin University (SHU) in Jingmei, Taipei City, also decided not to designate any outdoor smoking areas.
“We hope to completely ban smoking among faculty, teachers and students on campus,” said Ting Hui-chun (丁惠群), director of student matters at SHU’s Office of Student Affairs.
A survey conducted by the school in the fall semester of 2007 showed that about 5 percent of SHU’s students smoked.
Ting said although the school respected the “human rights” of smokers, it had instead opted to explain the health threat and social cost of smoking to those who used tobacco.
With strict prohibition of smoking, SHU had been “psychologically prepared” for objections from smokers, Ting said, adding that the school expected professors and international students to be less cooperative.
“With regard to professors who smoke, the school’s president [Lai Ting-ming (賴鼎銘)] made it [the smoke-free campus policy] during administrative meetings,” Ting said.
But Ting admitted that it would be difficult for the school to keep an eye on a large number of professors who tended to smoke inside their own offices.
“We plan to rely mostly on a persuasion strategy when it comes to professors,” Ting said. “Professors are well-educated. I believe they will understand.”
As for SHU’s students, Ting said, a patrol team composed of some 10 students would inspect the campus between classes and urge smokers to put out their cigarettes.
The principle is to avoid conflict with those who smoke, Ting said, adding that fining those who insisted on smoking on campus would be the last option.
FJU also launched a similar task force, with a larger 900 volunteer group, said Cheng Chi-chu (鄭津珠), director of the sanitary division of the school’s Student Affairs Office.
The volunteers were responsible for persuading smokers to head to the university’s puffing areas, Cheng said.
Cheng said the school changed its strategy from imposing restrictions to persuasion after its attempt to completely ban smoking in 2005 was unsuccessful.
“[We thought] since the school was unable to become a completely smoke-free campus, why didn’t the school set up outdoor smoking areas instead. This way, we would be able to satisfy smokers and protect the rights of nonsmokers,” she said.
Peng Yu-ting (彭于庭), a sophomore at FJU’s Department of Child and Family Studies, reported success for the school’s persuasion strategy.
Peng, who had served as one of the volunteers for three weeks, said fewer and fewer smokers would turn a deaf ear to the volunteers now.
Organizing one national referendum and 26 recall elections targeting Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators could cost NT$1.62 billion (US$55.38 million), the Central Election Commission said yesterday. The cost of each recall vote ranges from NT$16 million to NT$20 million, while that of a national referendum is NT$1.1 billion, the commission said. Based on the higher estimate of NT$20 million per recall vote, if all 26 confirmed recall votes against KMT legislators are taken into consideration, along with the national referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant, the total could be as much as NT$1.62 billion, it said. The commission previously announced
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday welcomed NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte’s remarks that the organization’s cooperation with Indo-Pacific partners must be deepened to deter potential threats from China and Russia. Rutte on Wednesday in Berlin met German Chancellor Friedrich Merz ahead of a ceremony marking the 70th anniversary of Germany’s accession to NATO. He told a post-meeting news conference that China is rapidly building up its armed forces, and the number of vessels in its navy outnumbers those of the US Navy. “They will have another 100 ships sailing by 2030. They now have 1,000 nuclear warheads,” Rutte said, adding that such
Tropical Storm Nari is not a threat to Taiwan, based on its positioning and trajectory, the Central Weather Administration (CWA) said yesterday. Nari has strengthened from a tropical depression that was positioned south of Japan, it said. The eye of the storm is about 2,100km east of Taipei, with a north-northeast trajectory moving toward the eastern seaboard of Japan, CWA data showed. Based on its current path, the storm would not affect Taiwan, the agency said.
The cosponsors of a new US sanctions package targeting Russia on Thursday briefed European allies and Ukraine on the legislation and said the legislation would also have a deterrent effect on China and curb its ambitions regarding Taiwan. The bill backed by US senators Lindsey Graham and Richard Blumenthal calls for a 500 percent tariff on goods imported from countries that buy Russian oil, gas, uranium and other exports — targeting nations such as China and India, which account for about 70 percent of Russia’s energy trade, the bankroll of much of its war effort. Graham and Blumenthal told The Associated Press