While government officials called the agreement signed between the Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) and the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS) on Nov. 4 as “a big step forward” in cross-strait trade relations, industry representatives said the results were not quite what they had expected.
Taiwan appeared to benefit in terms of cross-strait sea transport in the recent SEF-ARATS talks, they said. Once the agreement takes effect, vessels from Taiwan will be allowed to navigate directly to 63 Chinese sea and river ports.
Companies will also be exempt from paying business and income tax revenue derived from direct cross-strait shipping.
Under the terms of the agreement, vessels registered to shipping companies in Taiwan, Hong Kong and China can engage in direct cross-strait transport of passengers or cargo.
Flag-of-convenience (FOC) vessels, or those registered in another country, will also be allowed to participate in the direct shipping service, but will be restricted to those companies already engaged in offshore shipping center transport, cross-strait third-territory container line transport and the transportation of sand and gravel. The Ministry of Transportation and Communications (MOTC) said that the nation had 477 registered FOCs. The agreement only applies to 16 of them, or about 3 percent.
Meanwhile, qualifications outlined in the agreement essentially ruled out the nation’s bulk shipping carriers and FOCs operating with other countries. Some have even speculated that the measure is meant to encourage more shipping firms in Taiwan to switch their registrations to Hong Kong instead.
The government also sees the plans to increase cross-strait chartered flights as a breakthrough. The number of chartered flights will be increased from 36 per week to 108 per week, with each country allowed 54 flights. Services will also no longer be restricted to weekends.
But Tony Su (蘇宏義), chairman of the Taipei Airliners Association, said before the SEF-ARATS talks that the nation needed at least 84 weekly cross-strait charter flights if it aimed to have 3,000 Chinese tourists visit daily.
And though China now has 21 airports available for cross-strait charter flights service, Taiwan’s carriers are only planning to fly a few profitable routes — such as flights to Shanghai, which are capped at 20 per week.
The talks between SEF Chairman Chiang Pin-kung (江丙坤) and ARATS Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) also made it possible for both countries to launch anticipated chartered cargo flight services, starting with 60 flights per month.
However, what most of the nation’s carriers really wanted was to allow the passenger jets to carry freight, which is seen as a lucrative service. So far, both Taiwan and China have only agreed that passenger jets can carry airmail and packages sent by Chinese and Taiwanese postal services.
Representatives from the transportation and travel industries generally see resuming a dialogue between the two sides of the Strait as a positive development, though they do not necessarily agree with every detail of the negotiations.
China now “has all the bargaining chips,” they say. Whether it is about limitations on flights to big cities like Shanghai, the number of Chinese provinces from which residents are allowed to visit Taiwan, or the number of travel agencies authorized to organize group tours to Taiwan, they say China is in charge.
But they also have doubts about the ability of Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) officials to accurately represent them in the negotiations and defend their interests when discussing technical transportation issues.
Yao Ta-kuang (姚大光), chairman of the Travel Agent Association suggested that MAC officials could have used more leverage in the negotiations.
“Taiwan has allowed approximately 5 million Taiwanese to visit China since it lifted the restrictions two decades ago,” he said. “With the number of cross-strait charter flights that are currently available [36 flights], Chinese tourists who are able to come are only one-tenth the number of Taiwanese going to China. There’s no comparison.”
One travel service operator, who spoke on condition of anonymity, described the delegates from Taiwan as a “loosely formed team” and said they were dealing with experienced Chinese negotiators who participated in the first SEF-ARATS talk in 1993 in Singapore and subsequent talks in Shanghai in 1998.
Industry representatives were also upset at what they called the failure to include certain details in the cross-strait agreement.
Despite the downsides, MOTC officials said the agreement had drawn the attention of international sea liners and some have expressed an interest in registering their ships in Taiwan and setting up branches here.
A small number of Taiwanese this year lost their citizenship rights after traveling in China and obtaining a one-time Chinese passport to cross the border into Russia, a source said today. The people signed up through Chinese travel agencies for tours of neighboring Russia with companies claiming they could obtain Russian visas and fast-track border clearance, the source said on condition of anonymity. The travelers were actually issued one-time-use Chinese passports, they said. Taiwanese are prohibited from holding a Chinese passport or household registration. If found to have a Chinese ID, they may lose their resident status under Article 9-1
PROCEDURE: Although there is already a cross-strait agreement in place for the extradition of criminals, ample notice is meant to be given to the other side first Ten Taiwanese who were involved in fraud-related crimes in China were extradited back to Taiwan via Kinmen County on Wednesday, four of whom are convicted fraudsters in Taiwan. The 10 people arrived via a ferry operating between Xiamen and Kinmen, also known as the “small three links.” The Kinmen County Prosecutors’ Office yesterday said that four of the 10 extradited people were convicted in Taiwan for committing fraud and contravening the Money Laundering Control Act (洗錢防制法), and were on the wanted list. They were immediately arrested upon arrival and sent to Kinmen Prison to serve their sentences following brief questioning, the office said.
PROBLEMATIC APP: Citing more than 1,000 fraud cases, the government is taking the app down for a year, but opposition voices are calling it censorship Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) yesterday decried a government plan to suspend access to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu (小紅書) for one year as censorship, while the Presidential Office backed the plan. The Ministry of the Interior on Thursday cited security risks and accusations that the Instagram-like app, known as Rednote in English, had figured in more than 1,700 fraud cases since last year. The company, which has about 3 million users in Taiwan, has not yet responded to requests for comment. “Many people online are already asking ‘How to climb over the firewall to access Xiaohongshu,’” Cheng posted on
Taiwanese were praised for their composure after a video filmed by Taiwanese tourists capturing the moment a magnitude 7.5 earthquake struck Japan’s Aomori Prefecture went viral on social media. The video shows a hotel room shaking violently amid Monday’s quake, with objects falling to the ground. Two Taiwanese began filming with their mobile phones, while two others held the sides of a TV to prevent it from falling. When the shaking stopped, the pair calmly took down the TV and laid it flat on a tatami mat, the video shows. The video also captured the group talking about the safety of their companions bathing
RSS