The referendum on the need for the country to beef up its anti-missile equipment in the face of the ballistic missile threat from China did not pass because less than half of the electorate took part.
The Central Election Commission said only 45.17 percent of eligible voters cast ballots on the first question, or 7.4 million people.
The referendum results, therefore, will have no binding effects on the Ministry of National Defense in the purchase of anti-missile equipment.
PHOTO: LU HSIEN-HSIU, TAIPEI TIMES
However, the majority of people who cast ballots on the question supported the thesis that the country should increase its purchases of anti-missile equipment to counter China's missiles.
A total of 6.5 million voters supported an increase in anti-missile purchases, while only half a million were against it, the commission said.
The results showed that although only one-half of the turnout were interested in the referendum, those that did take part were on the side of the government.
The defense ministry did not make any comment on the referendum results.
A senior official with the ministry's spokesman's office said Minister of National Defense Tang Yao-ming (湯曜明) has already expressed the ministry's stance on the issue.
"Tang stated several weeks ago that whatever the results of the referendum, the ministry will not change its plans to buy the US-made Patriot PAC-3 anti-missile system," the official said.
The Patriot PAC-3 system is the main one the ministry plans to buy to counter China's increasing missile threat.
Tang was criticized for making an "improper" statement, since his comment raised the question of whether the referendum question was necessary since the results would not have a binding effect on the ministry.
Tang later rephrased his statement, saying he was referring to anti-missile equipment which the ministry had yet to decide to buy. The PAC-3 was not included because it is an item the ministry has already decided to buy.
Keven Cheng (鄭繼文), editor-in-chief of Defence International magazine, said he did not think the referendum would have any effect on the ministry regardless of whether it passed or not.
"Whether to buy anti-missile equipment such the PAC-3 is not so much an issue for public discussion as a problem for the government itself. The government's concern should be whether it has enough money to buy the PAC-3 or whether the purchase of the PAC-3 might edge out other equipment," Cheng said.
Andrew Yang (楊念祖), secretary-general of Chinese Council of Advanced Policy Studies, said the anti-missile referendum was justifiable but whether public opinion should be consulted about arms purchases have yet to be debated.
"The referendum result would not have any effects on China in its deployment of ballistic missiles against us. But it represents a collective public statement of Taiwan," Yang said.
The referendum was based on the premise that if China does not withdraw its missiles targeted at Taiwan and not renounce the use of force against the country, the government should consider increasing its anti-missile equipment.
Former Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) first proposed the withdrawal of missiles aimed at Taiwan in exchange for the US not selling high-tech weapons to Taiwan.
"Jiang's proposal was a bargaining chip toward both the US and Taiwan. What he wanted from Taiwan was a reassurance that it would not push for independence," Yang said.
"The referendum was an indication of the country's moving away from any potential form of reunification with China. Reunification is out of the picture," he said.
Holmes Liao (廖宏祥), a researcher with the Taiwan Research Institute, said the anti-missile referendum had several dimensions.
"It represents a challenge to the military's long-term exclusion of all outsiders from the discussion of important issues such as arms purchases," Liao said.
"The Ministry of National Defense has said that military issues should be discussed and solved by military personnel, because they are the only ones who have the relevant knowledge and expertise," he said.
Netflix on Wednesday said it is to charge NT$100 more per month for each user that is not part of the same household. Under the plan, the streaming service is to limit viewership to people who live in the same household. If a member wishes to add people outside of their address, they must pay NT$100 more per person every month. No additional viewers can be added to the NT$270 per month “basic” account. “Standard” accounts (NT$330) can add one user, while “premium” (NT$390) accounts can add two users. The company has said that people in the same household would still be able
PRESSURE POINT: Beijing might seek to lean on Musk to prevent his SpaceX from providing Taiwan access to its Starlink satellite system, ‘The Economist’ said Minister of Foreign Affairs Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) called out Elon Musk on Twitter, saying the value of democracy transcends that of money after the Tesla CEO said that China was likely to “integrate” Taiwan. Asked in an interview with CNBC on Tuesday last week if “China would make a move to take control of Taiwan,” Musk said that “the official policy of China is that Taiwan should be integrated... One does not need to read between the lines.” “There is a certain inevitability to the situation,” he added. “That is their policy, and I think you should take their word seriously,” Musk said. Regarding
VIGILANCE: The mask mandate would remain in effect at healthcare facilities, healthcare-related institutes and senior welfare facilities due to high infection risks there The mask mandate would be extended next month for three types of venues, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) said yesterday as it reported that the average daily number of hospitalized COVID-19 cases increased by more than 30 percent last week. Local COVID-19 cases last week rose to an average of 204 daily hospitalizations, an increase of 32.5 percent from the previous week, CDC Epidemic Intelligence Center Director Guo Hung-wei (郭宏偉) said. The number of prescriptions for oral anti-viral drugs to treat COVID-19 also increased to 23,503 courses — 17,424 courses of Paxlovid and 6,079 courses of molnupiravir. The average positivity rate
GROWING FAST: China continues to outpace the US in its production and commissioning of ships, as it seeks to expand ‘far seas operations,’ an ex-US Navy captain said China continued to increase its naval capacity last year, indicating that it is seeking to bolster its ability to invade Taiwan, a retired US Navy captain said. In an article published in this month’s issue of the US Naval Institute’s Proceedings magazine, retired US Navy Captain James Fanell wrote that China commissioned 10 warships and one submarine last year, and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) was continuing to commission the most annual tonnage globally, as it has done for at least the past five years. The PLAN is also outproducing the US Navy in total number of ships, tonnage and
RSS