Legalizing casinos is not the answer to Penghu's economic woes, according to activists and legislators who spoke up against gambling on the eve of a Penghu County referendum on the issue.
"A referendum on gambling is a serious issue that deserves to be rethought," said Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Eugene Jao (趙永清) at the Legislative Yuan yesterday morning.
"We need to consider the consequences from different perspectives. Legalized gambling would affect the business of other trades, hurt natural resources, and make gambling a part of Penghu's general environment," he said.
The Penghu County Government will be conducting an advisory referendum today to determine whether Penghu residents support the legalization of casinos. The ballot issued by the county government asks voters to cast a ballot for or against the county government's bid to establish casinos in special tourism districts in the county.
Proponents of legalizing casinos have argued that casinos would help boost tourism and be a source of income for the remote county.
"Penghu's geography and weather have imposed restrictions on its economic development," said Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lin Pin-kun (林炳坤), who represents the Penghu constituency.
"This advisory referendum plays a pivotal role in deciding the future of the county," he said.
Lin said that if the results of the advisory referendum were in favor of casinos, he would have more sway in pushing for a formal referendum in accordance with the Referendum Law (
However, Chao-hwei Shih (
Shih said that legalization of gambling in Taiwan was not a decision that Penghu could make for all Taiwanese people.
"If gambling is legalized, all Taiwanese citizens would be affected. If there is to be a referendum on legalizing casinos, it should be a nation-wide referendum," Shih said.
"If the legalization of casinos is just for the sake of financial gain, then the casinos should be open only to foreigners visiting Taiwan. That's how it's done in Korea," Shih said.
In addition, environmental activists have also expressed concern of the impact of legalizing casinos in Penghu. Penghu Environmental Protection Society President Lin Chang-hsing (林長興) asserted that there was no need for casinos given the abundant ecological resources in Penghu.
"What we need are tourists, not gamblers in Penghu. The cultural and environmental resources of Penghu should draw tourists, not casinos," Lin said.
Chen Man-li (陳曼麗), president of the Homemakers' Union and Foundation echoed Lin's sentiments.
"Economically speaking, Penghu may not be developing as quickly as the rest of Taiwan, but we need to take into consideration sustainable development. Gambling is not in the interest of the island county's long term development needs," said Chen. He warned that casinos would lead to the destruction of Penghu's cultural and environmental assets.
"The referendum will have no legal effect but it will put pressure on the central government," Shih said. "The timing of this advisory referendum makes us suspicious. Why is the Penghu County Government in such a rush to hold this referendum? They do not even have Cabinet approval."
Jao also cautioned the public to take special notice of the turn-out rate, saying that those who turned up to vote would most likely vote in favor of establishing casinos, since the referendum had been organized by supporters of casinos.
"The approval ratings will probably be very high but it's important to take a look at the percentage of people who actually voted," Jao said.
Voting will be open to all Penghu residents 20 years of age or older, and referendum results will be announced tonight.
A small number of Taiwanese this year lost their citizenship rights after traveling in China and obtaining a one-time Chinese passport to cross the border into Russia, a source said today. The people signed up through Chinese travel agencies for tours of neighboring Russia with companies claiming they could obtain Russian visas and fast-track border clearance, the source said on condition of anonymity. The travelers were actually issued one-time-use Chinese passports, they said. Taiwanese are prohibited from holding a Chinese passport or household registration. If found to have a Chinese ID, they may lose their resident status under Article 9-1
Taiwanese were praised for their composure after a video filmed by Taiwanese tourists capturing the moment a magnitude 7.5 earthquake struck Japan’s Aomori Prefecture went viral on social media. The video shows a hotel room shaking violently amid Monday’s quake, with objects falling to the ground. Two Taiwanese began filming with their mobile phones, while two others held the sides of a TV to prevent it from falling. When the shaking stopped, the pair calmly took down the TV and laid it flat on a tatami mat, the video shows. The video also captured the group talking about the safety of their companions bathing
Starting on Jan. 1, YouBike riders must have insurance to use the service, and a six-month trial of NT$5 coupons under certain conditions would be implemented to balance bike shortages, a joint statement from transportation departments across Taipei, New Taipei City and Taoyuan announced yesterday. The rental bike system operator said that coupons would be offered to riders to rent bikes from full stations, for riders who take out an electric-assisted bike from a full station, and for riders who return a bike to an empty station. All riders with YouBike accounts are automatically eligible for the program, and each membership account
A classified Pentagon-produced, multiyear assessment — the Overmatch brief — highlighted unreported Chinese capabilities to destroy US military assets and identified US supply chain choke points, painting a disturbing picture of waning US military might, a New York Times editorial published on Monday said. US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth’s comments in November last year that “we lose every time” in Pentagon-conducted war games pitting the US against China further highlighted the uncertainty about the US’ capability to intervene in the event of a Chinese invasion of Taiwan. “It shows the Pentagon’s overreliance on expensive, vulnerable weapons as adversaries field cheap, technologically