The US and Taiwan have long been close partners in the IT sector.
Taiwan is a leading information technology producer and is the world's top producer of many types of information technology products. Although Taiwan is the world's third largest supplier of computer hardware, the local software industry is still heavily dependent on imported software.
For this reason, the software sector represents an excellent opportunity for cooperation between Taiwanese and American companies. Opportunities exist for sales of existing US products as well as for the localization, translation, and joint development of software.
As of 2001, Taiwan's software market was close to US$5 billion and growing. American vendors play a very important role and will continue to hold the lion's share of the software market in coming years.
Present US-origin imports include operation systems, networking software, suite software, program languages, Internet applications and software tools for workstations.
There is also strong demand for databases, middleware, content management software, enterprise application integration, wireless applications, software management packages, and Internet-related products including supply chain management, E-procurement, information security software and customer relations management software.
Many of Taiwan's IT manufacturers are expanding their production into information appliances, including thin-client computers, Net TVs, screen phones, game consoles and devices and smart handheld devices.
At present, Taiwan IA production accounts for 3 percent of Taiwan's overall IT hardware manufacturing output, totaling US$1.7 billion in 2001.
This volume is expected to exceed 25 million units in 2003 (30 percent of global output) and US$6.4 billion in 2005 (35 percent of global output).
To help US and Taiwan IA companies better understand each other and to help identify potential business partners, the Commercial Section of the American Institute in Taiwan, the National Information and Communication Steering Committee of the Executive Yuan (NICI/EY), Taipei Computer Association (TCA), Washington State Office of Trade and Economic Development (OTED) and Institute for Information Industry (III) organized an IA mission from March 31-April 6, 2002 to visit Seattle and California's Silicon Valley.
The main objective of this mission was to introduce US companies to the key players in Taiwan's IA sector to help them do business together, both in Taiwan and worldwide.
This mission also familiarized participating Taiwanese with US technology and expertise, enabling participants to seek suitable products or technologies to distribute or represent in Taiwan.
The mission helped participants better understand new IT technology trends and applications, and encouraged both sides to set up strategic alliances, meet industry decision-makers, and facilitate business partnerships.
The CEO-level Taiwan delegation led by Minister Tsay Ching-yen consisted of leaders in Taiwan's technology sector, both public and corporate.
The AIT Commercial Section believes this type of mission will enhance the growth of partnerships between US and Taiwanese Internet appliance firms in the constantly changing world of innovation.
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday said that China has “no right to represent Taiwan,” but stressed that the nation was willing to work with Beijing on issues of mutual interest. “The Republic of China has already put down roots in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu,” Lai said in his first Double Ten National Day address outside the Presidential Office Building in Taipei. “And the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China [PRC] are not subordinate to each other.” “The People’s Republic of China has no right to represent Taiwan,” he said at the event marking the 113th National Day of
REACTION TO LAI: A former US official said William Lai took a step toward stability with his National Day speech and the question was how Beijing would respond US Secretary of State Antony Blinken yesterday warned China against taking any “provocative” action on Taiwan after Beijing’s reaction to President William Lai’s (賴清德) speech on Double Ten National Day on Thursday. Blinken, speaking in Laos after an ASEAN East Asia Summit, called the speech by Lai, in which he vowed to “resist annexation,” a “regular exercise.” “China should not use it in any fashion as a pretext for provocative actions,” Blinken told reporters. “On the contrary, we want to reinforce — and many other countries want to reinforce — the imperative of preserving the status quo, and neither party taking any
SPEECH IMPEDIMENT? The state department said that using routine celebrations or public remarks as a pretext for provocation would undermine peace and stability Beijing’s expected use of President William Lai’s (賴清德) Double Ten National Day speech today as a pretext for provocative measures would undermine peace and stability, the US Department of State said on Tuesday. Taiwanese officials have said that China is likely to launch military drills near Taiwan in response to Lai’s speech as a pretext to pressure the nation to accept its sovereignty claims. A state department spokesperson said it could not speculate on what China would or would not do. “However, it is worth emphasizing that using routine annual celebrations or public remarks as a pretext or excuse for provocative or coercive