Human rights activists said that while they consider it a blessing that two international covenants on human rights have been taken up by the legislature for ratification, the covenants themselves still need to be carefully examined.
The bills are complicated by both Taiwan's political status as well as some disparities between the country's domestic statutes and specific articles of the conventions.
Taiwan signed several international human rights conventions, which include the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), before 1971.
However, since 1971, the documents on these treaties have been shelved at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and have remained inaccessible to the public.
In pursuance of President Chen Shui-bian's (
Should they be passed by the legislature, the president must then sign the instrument of ratification and deposit it with the secretary-general of the UN.
But officials admit it is unlikely that the UN will accept the deposition from Taiwan, whose statehood by the international organization's standards is still in question.
"We could declare accession and ratify the treaties on our own, but problems would come at the final phase of deposit. It's unlikely to be accepted," said an official from the department of treaty and legal affairs of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
However, many others, such as Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), believe that a commitment to human rights will not be undermined by Taiwan's peculiar political situation.
During an earlier Cabinet meeting on the issue, members were divided as to whether Taiwan will take the step of deposition given the UN's persistent stance of not recognizing Taiwan as a state.
Nevertheless, Ma, also president of the Chinese International Law Society, has vigorously maintained that attempts to deposit the two conventions demonstrates Taiwan's respect for and commitment to the UN Charter and the human rights system within it.
"I believe the importance of human rights weighs a great deal on the UN. It just can't ignore our existence," Ma said.
"Also, I don't think the action will hurt cross-strait relations because it is a human rights issue -- not a sovereignty issue -- that we are concerned with."
There have been attempts by non-governmental organizations to persuade the UN to allow Taiwan to become a signatory to the UN Convention of the Rights of the Child.
Kau Yu-chuan (
Kau said it may be disappointing but said that the case to a great extent reflects the reality of UN politics.
Kau added however, that there are still other ways for Taiwan to become a part of the international human rights system.
He said signing multilateral treaties with other countries and encouraging domestic NGOs to promote the country's commitment to joining the international community would both benefit the nation.
Aside from problems with the deposition action, there have also been some questions on whether Taiwan will address specific articles of the two covenants that may contradict the country's existing legal code.
One such item is article six of the ICCPR which bans imposing the death penalty on offenders below 18 years of age or on pregnant women.
Domestic statutes hold similar bans, but with one exception -- minors in Taiwan can be subject to the death penalty if they murder their parents.
Moreover, there is also a disparity between Taiwan's criminal code and paragraph seven of the document's 14th article, which states no one shall be liable to be tried or punished again for an offence for which he has already been convicted or acquitted of in accordance with the law and penal procedure of each signator to the convention.
The US has made reservation on the article concerning capital punishment; Denmark, Finland, and Netherlands have made reservations on the article on resumption of criminal cases.
Nigel Li (
"The issue is not as simple as many people see it. What we need to think about carefully is what the ratification is for. Do we just want to declare our determination and commitment to human rights or do we really want to realize the rights recognized in the two covenants?
"Because if we want to realize it fully, we had better begin an overhaul of domestic statutes."Li said.
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi said yesterday that China using armed force against Taiwan could constitute a "survival-threatening situation" for Japan, allowing the country to mobilize the Japanese armed forces under its security laws. Takaichi made the remarks during a parliamentary session yesterday while responding to a question about whether a "Taiwan contingency" involving a Chinese naval blockade would qualify as a "survival-threatening situation" for Japan, according to a report by Japan’s Asahi Shimbun. "If warships are used and other armed actions are involved, I believe this could constitute a survival- threatening
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s