Members of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) from China, Hong Kong and Taiwan opened a new channel of communication for discussing environmental issues in China last week that hopes to sidestep contentious political issues.
The first gathering of dozens of NGO activists and environmental journalists from Taiwan, Hong Kong and China took place April 9 in Hong Kong.
The two-day Forum on Green NGOs and Environmental Journalism was sponsored by the US' Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars, as well as the Center of Asian Studies and the Journalism Media Studies Center of the University of Hong Kong.
It was the first time that environmental activists and journalists from the three areas were able to exchange opinions on ecological conservation and environmental protection.
Wong Siu-lun (黃紹倫), director of the Center of Asian Studies at the University of Hong Kong in a speech to open the forum said that, in the past, people from the three regions tended to discuss political issues only. Wong said it was time for a change because a new regional grouping in Asia is forming and national boundaries would not necessarily mean a rigid separation.
"I think unofficial channels like this [for discussing non-political issues] should become a new model for people to approach China affairs," Wong said.
In answer to a question from the Taipei Times, Wong said that this type of forum should not be a sensitive issue for any government as long as people are rational.
"We're keeping it a rational gathering. We are not really [trying] to cultivate pressure groups. I think governments should already know this," Wong said.
Wong said that participants' appearance in Hong Kong proved that communication through such channels was actually encouraged. In addition, Wong said, this kind of gathering would build trust between NGOs and governments.
Jennifer Turner, senior project associate of the Environmental Change and Security Project (ECSP) of the Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars' Asia Program, said that the forum was a good chance for activists and members of NGOs from different areas to exchange experiences.
Through meetings, publications and the activities, the ECSP has explored a wide range of academic and policy-related topics in the US and other countries since 1994.
Topics include how environmental issues, population issues and security ideas are tied into the broader debate over redefining security and how governments and NGOs, businesses and other organizations respond to environmental and demographic issues.
In past years, the Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars, a non-partisan center, established in 1968 by the US Congress, has made efforts to unite environmentalists from China, Hong Kong and Taiwan.
In September 1999, the first NGO Forum on US-China Environmental Cooperation was held in the US state of Maryland. Last year, the center invited seven activists from China, Hong Kong and Taiwan to Washington to discuss a future large gathering, which became the forum held in Hong Kong last week.
"Last year in Washington DC, we discussed the possibility of working together by allying with NGOs to solve regional environmental problems in Asia," Joyce Fu (伏嘉捷), secretary-general of Taiwan's Green Formosa Front (台灣綠色陣線), told the Taipei Times.
Fu was one of two representatives from Taiwan NGOs who were invited to the US last year by the center to help plan the forum.
"I do believe that activists in Taiwan have to reach out to incorporate foreign assistance in engaging in our local advocacy," Fu said.
For activists in Taiwan, however, it was not easy to narrow the gap between themselves and their counterparts in China.
Taiwan's environmental movement sprouted in the 1970s when a number of environmental pollution cases emerged, brought on by the nation's rapid economic development.
Compared with Taiwan, the environmental movement in China is still in its infancy. Until 1994, when Liang Congjie (
At the forum, Liang said that NGOs in China can educate the public in order to raise the environmental awareness.
The forum also drew international attention. Observers at the forum included representatives of the US-based Rockefeller Brothers Foundation, the W. Alton Jones Foundation, and the Royal Norwegian Consulate General in Europe.
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday said that China has “no right to represent Taiwan,” but stressed that the nation was willing to work with Beijing on issues of mutual interest. “The Republic of China has already put down roots in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu,” Lai said in his first Double Ten National Day address outside the Presidential Office Building in Taipei. “And the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China [PRC] are not subordinate to each other.” “The People’s Republic of China has no right to represent Taiwan,” he said at the event marking the 113th National Day of
REACTION TO LAI: A former US official said William Lai took a step toward stability with his National Day speech and the question was how Beijing would respond US Secretary of State Antony Blinken yesterday warned China against taking any “provocative” action on Taiwan after Beijing’s reaction to President William Lai’s (賴清德) speech on Double Ten National Day on Thursday. Blinken, speaking in Laos after an ASEAN East Asia Summit, called the speech by Lai, in which he vowed to “resist annexation,” a “regular exercise.” “China should not use it in any fashion as a pretext for provocative actions,” Blinken told reporters. “On the contrary, we want to reinforce — and many other countries want to reinforce — the imperative of preserving the status quo, and neither party taking any
SPEECH IMPEDIMENT? The state department said that using routine celebrations or public remarks as a pretext for provocation would undermine peace and stability Beijing’s expected use of President William Lai’s (賴清德) Double Ten National Day speech today as a pretext for provocative measures would undermine peace and stability, the US Department of State said on Tuesday. Taiwanese officials have said that China is likely to launch military drills near Taiwan in response to Lai’s speech as a pretext to pressure the nation to accept its sovereignty claims. A state department spokesperson said it could not speculate on what China would or would not do. “However, it is worth emphasizing that using routine annual celebrations or public remarks as a pretext or excuse for provocative or coercive