Taipei Times: Why do you propose the concept of a "cross-strait common market" (
Vincent Siew (蕭萬長): Let me first clarify this point by saying that my common market proposal is in tandem with the WTO framework. Both China and Taiwan expect to join the WTO [later this year] but we will both be more susceptible to the influence of the world economy after WTO accession.
Under such circumstances, [economic] cooperation to the mutual benefit of both sides will be the core issue. The establishment of a cross-strait common market will therefore be supplementary to our WTO memberships. The market will not conflict with the WTO framework; on the contrary, it will further enhance our power in the WTO.
PHOTO: CHEN CHENG-CHANG, TAIPEI TIMES
TT: Minister of Economic AffairsLin Hsin-yi (
Siew: The establishment of a cross-strait common market is a long-term goal and will not be attained right away. The concept is a strategic direction and a future goal for the development of cross-strait trade. If the two sides reach an agreement on my proposal, these trade obstacles across the Strait will eventually be resolved.
TT: Can you briefly elaborate on this cross-strait common market?
Siew: [It's aim is] to enhance mutual benefits and economic cooperation across the Strait. It follows the example of the European model, but is definitely not a transplant since our relations with China differ greatly [from relations in the EU].
As we implement step-by-step procedures to accomplish [the common market] along a timeline of 20 to 30 years, economics, not politics, should be the top priority in promoting the market. I hope both sides will put aside their political differences and ideologies.
In terms of measures for its establishment, there are several proposed stages. In the first stage, we should promote the normalization of economic and trade relations across the Strait to remove trade obstacles. Secondly, both sides should coordinate the development of economic rules and regulations with the aim of harmonizing policies in order to reach a Free Trade Agreement. Thirdly, economic integration, including a customs union and monetary mechanism, can then be set up to facilitate the establishment of the cross-strait common market.
TT: Some academics have argued that the concept will be too market-driven to ignore severe political differences with China and have therefore concluded that economic approaches to enhancing cross-strait relations are problematic.
Siew: For the past few years, political approaches to solving the cross-strait impasse have proven unfeasible. The impasse hasled to increasing political confrontation since we have different political positions and political systems.
Where economic interaction is concerned, however, it is based on mutual interest irrespective of governments. It is therefore an inevitable trend for the two sides to become economically closer and to allow cooperation to take place.
Given the fact that China has adopted economic reforms, economic integration will pave the way to peacefully enhance mutual understanding and mutual trust and finally political integration across the Strait.
TT: A US business executive, Therese Shaheen, has characterized your proposal as a "one system, two countries" model since you have emphasized economic unity first and suggested that political convergence can then follow. Will your proposal pose a challenge to China's insistence on "one country, two systems?"
Siew: She has probably misinterpreted my proposal. My proposal involves no political implications at all and I disagree with her in that respect. Other than that, I have to say I endorse her calls on the Bush administration to reorient the US' China policy by adopting a new economics-based approach.
What I presented [in a Jan. 22 lecture] has nothing to do with either "one system, two countries" or "one country, two systems."
Let me stress again the importance of cross-strait economic integration, by putting aside political differences, as a starter that will lead to peaceful political integration eventually.
TT: Politically speaking, under what circumstances do you think China will accept the concept of a cross-strait common market?
Siew: China's main political concern lies in its "one China" principle. On this, I have long made my stance clear. That is, I think that both governments should honor the 1992 consensus -- one China with both sides having different interpretations -- to remove the political barriers toward future cross-strait economic cooperation.
It's hard to work out a formula or new terminology that both sides can accept. Besides, politicians of our generation have no right to decide Taiwan's future for the next generation. We should, therefore, put economic deals before political ones.
TT: What form do you envisage cross-strait economic cooperation taking?
Siew: To create `win-win' cooperation. China can take advantage of Taiwan's economic capabilities in management, marketing and investment while its own competitive manufacturing with lower wages and costs will play an important role [for both sides].
In addition, Taiwan is located at the strategic vantage point by way of which foreign investors enter China's market. Taiwan is therefore able to bridge the gap between China and other developed countries in terms of business models, cultures and customs. There are many multinational corporations in China right now, but few have made money because they are not accustomed to China's business environment.
TT: You've revealed a little bit about your intended visit to China. Will you meet with high-ranking Chinese officials?
Siew: We are still planning the trip. The trip's purpose is to promote my common market concept and to learn China's response. I have not ruled out the possibility [of meeting with high-ranking officials] if the government consents to my doing so, however. After all, as a former government official, I am banned from visiting China.
TT: During your time in office, you drew up the restrictions on former government officials visiting China. But now, you seem to have different opinions on such visits.
Siew: Yes, I now feel the ban should be lifted because we should have faith in our government officials' loyalty. Also, the government should encourage its officials to visit China as often as possible to enhance mutual understanding.
TT: You are currently the KMT's vice chairman. How do you look at the possible cooperation between your party and the People First Party (PFP)?
Siew: Inter-party cooperation in elections is an ideal, but in politics it's all about practicality and competition. It's not easy.
TT: As a former premier, how do you evaluate the feasibility of Premier Chang Chun-hsiung's (
Siew: This solution was actually adopted by my administration three years ago. So I think he is heading in the right direction. However, he should stress the importance of near total implementation of the plan. To accomplish that goal, the premier will have to help to remove all bureaucratic red tape for major construction projects.
SECURITY: As China is ‘reshaping’ Hong Kong’s population, Taiwan must raise the eligibility threshold for applications from Hong Kongers, Chiu Chui-cheng said When Hong Kong and Macau citizens apply for residency in Taiwan, it would be under a new category that includes a “national security observation period,” Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday. President William Lai (賴清德) on March 13 announced 17 strategies to counter China’s aggression toward Taiwan, including incorporating national security considerations into the review process for residency applications from Hong Kong and Macau citizens. The situation in Hong Kong is constantly changing, Chiu said to media yesterday on the sidelines of the Taipei Technology Run hosted by the Taipei Neihu Technology Park Development Association. With
CARROT AND STICK: While unrelenting in its military threats, China attracted nearly 40,000 Taiwanese to over 400 business events last year Nearly 40,000 Taiwanese last year joined industry events in China, such as conferences and trade fairs, supported by the Chinese government, a study showed yesterday, as Beijing ramps up a charm offensive toward Taipei alongside military pressure. China has long taken a carrot-and-stick approach to Taiwan, threatening it with the prospect of military action while reaching out to those it believes are amenable to Beijing’s point of view. Taiwanese security officials are wary of what they see as Beijing’s influence campaigns to sway public opinion after Taipei and Beijing gradually resumed travel links halted by the COVID-19 pandemic, but the scale of
TRADE: A mandatory declaration of origin for manufactured goods bound for the US is to take effect on May 7 to block China from exploiting Taiwan’s trade channels All products manufactured in Taiwan and exported to the US must include a signed declaration of origin starting on May 7, the Bureau of Foreign Trade announced yesterday. US President Donald Trump on April 2 imposed a 32 percent tariff on imports from Taiwan, but one week later announced a 90-day pause on its implementation. However, a universal 10 percent tariff was immediately applied to most imports from around the world. On April 12, the Trump administration further exempted computers, smartphones and semiconductors from the new tariffs. In response, President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration has introduced a series of countermeasures to support affected
Pope Francis is be laid to rest on Saturday after lying in state for three days in St Peter’s Basilica, where the faithful are expected to flock to pay their respects to history’s first Latin American pontiff. The cardinals met yesterday in the Vatican’s synod hall to chart the next steps before a conclave begins to choose Francis’ successor, as condolences poured in from around the world. According to current norms, the conclave must begin between May 5 and 10. The cardinals set the funeral for Saturday at 10am in St Peter’s Square, to be celebrated by the dean of the College