Residents whose homes were damaged in the 921 earthquake could be compensated as soon as next Tuesday -- if building inspectors can decide how to effectively complete their work, interior ministry officials said yesterday.
The only obstacle to compensation, local government officials have complained, is getting inspectors to assess buildings and classify them as "damaged" -- marked with a yellow sticker -- or "destroyed," marked with a red sticker.
At a public hearing yester-day, officials from the interior ministry's construction and planning administration said they had heard such complaints from village and neighborhood wardens.
The problem appears to be a lack of organization. Although groups of architects have volun-teered to do a task normally shouldered by civil servants, many are not receiving clear instructions on where they should be working, said Lee Yu-sheng (李玉生), deputy section chief of the administration's building regulation section.
"Some village chiefs sought help from professional civil engineers and architects in evaluating questionable structures. But some professionals were at a loss after reaching counties defined as disaster areas. Building management units were too busy with their own tasks," Lee said.
"Many professionals traveled to quake-stricken townships only to find that other groups of inspectors had already been there," he added.
The post-disaster reconstruction commission decided on Monday to clarify in writing the division of labor among various professional associations, Lee said.
"We'll finish the re-examination within a week, and then complete the compensation payments for those eligible," Lee said.
According to a Sept. 30 announcement by the interior ministry, residents whose houses have been classified as "destroyed" will receive NT$200,000, and those with "damaged" houses will get NT$100,000.
Legislators who have returned to disaster-struck constituencies called the examination process "chaotic."
"A problem facing residents in disaster areas is that they are confused by the different stickers attached to their homes," said Legislator Yang Chun-ying (楊瓊瓔). "Some people found red stickers on their homes in the morning, and yellow ones in the afternoon. They don't know which to believe."
"I also simply don't understand why the task of compensation hasn't been completed yet," she said.
Even Premier Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) admitted at the legislature yesterday that nearly half of compensation funds have failed to reach those eligible, as borough wardens were in need of professional evaluation assistance.
Whatever the result of compensation plans, mortgages on damaged or destroyed homes will be carried by banks and not the government, finance officials confirmed yesterday.
"This is one major agreement we've reached after four rounds of negotiations with the banking sector," said Sean Chen (陳沖), administrative vice minister of finance. "The financial sector can only help those who are really in need."
But bankers said it is still difficult to estimate the full extent of the burden on the banking system as many databases were destroyed during the earthquake.
"Preliminary calculations are not accurate as many statistics are buried in the rubble," said James Lo (
THREATS: Naval facilities have been built in Shanghai and Zhejiang, while airbases have been expanded in Xiamen, Fuzhou and Zhangpu, across the Strait from Taiwan The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is building large-scale military infrastructure at five sites along the eastern coast of China, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said in a recent report. The latest issue of the council’s Mainland China Situation Quarterly said satellite photos showed military infrastructure such as air force and naval bases being constructed along the eastern coast of China. That means the CCP might be preparing for potential conflict in Taiwan, it said, adding that there are five such construction sites from north to south. A naval base has been built in Shanghai’s Pudong New Area, with underground oil storage tanks, railway
MILESTONE: The foreign minister called the signing ‘a major step forward in US-Taiwan relations,’ while the Presidential Office said it was a symbol of the nations’ shared values US President Donald Trump on Tuesday signed into law the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act, which requires the US Department of State to regularly review and update guidelines governing official US interactions with Taiwan. The new law is an amendment to the Taiwan Assurance Act of 2020 focused on reviewing guidelines on US interactions with Taiwan. Previously, the state department was required to conduct a one-time review of its guidance governing relations with Taiwan, but under the new bill, the agency must conduct a review “not less than every five years.” It must then submit an updated report based on its findings “not later
A trial run of the north concourse of Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport’s new Terminal 3 is to commence today, the Ministry of Transportation and Communications said yesterday. The eight additional boarding gates would allow for more aircraft parking spaces that are expected to boost the airport’s capacity by 5.8 million passengers annually, Deputy Minister of Transportation and Communications Lin Kuo-shian (林國顯) said. The concourse, designed by a team led by British architect Richard Rogers, provides a refreshing space, Lin said, adding that travelers would enjoy the tall and transparent design that allows sunshine to stream into the concourse through glass curtain walls. The
The Presidential Office today thanked the US for enacting the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act, which requires the US Department of State to regularly review and update guidelines governing official US interactions with Taiwan. The new law, signed by US President Donald Trump yesterday, is an amendment to the Taiwan Assurance Act of 2020 focused on reviewing guidelines on US interactions with Taiwan. Previously, the department was required to conduct a one-time review of its guidance governing relations with Taiwan, but under the new bill, the agency must conduct such a review "not less than every five years." It must then submit an updated