The Hong Kong government has tried, but failed to secure help from any of the global public relations (PR) firms it has approached to salvage the financial hub’s tarnished reputation, as anti-government protests continued to wreak havoc months into its deepest political crisis in decades.
Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam (林鄭月娥) told a group of businesspeople in the territory late last month that the government had approached eight global PR companies to help it relaunch Hong Kong, but four “immediately declined, because that would be a detriment to their reputation to support the Hong Kong government now,” according to a transcript of her speech published by Reuters last week.
Two more declined later, she said.
Now, it appears that all have turned down the government’s invitation of bids.
In a response to the Guardian’s inquiry, the Hong Kong Information Services Department said: “The quotation exercise lapsed as no bid was received by the close of the quotation period.”
The government said it “has no immediate plan to conduct a procurement exercise of a similar nature.”
At a press briefing yesterday, Lam confirmed that the government had approached PR companies, but had been advised that “the time is not right” to rebuild the image of Hong Kong.
“But Hong Kong’s fundamentals remain very strong ... the time will come for us to launch a major campaign to restore some of the damage done to Hong Kong’s reputation,” she said.
Lam also said she disagreed with credit rating agency Moody’s downgrade of its outlook on Hong Kong from “stable” to “negative” this week, but said “violent acts” in the ongoing protests would “inevitably undermine and affect the international perception of Hong Kong’s business environment.”
According to a copy of the government brief carried by the Holmes Report, a PR trade publication, the government was aware that the ongoing protests have raised concerns over Hong Kong’s reputation “as a global business and financial hub with a stable environment underpinned by the rule of law” and the safety of business travelers and tourists.
The document said the government was seeking advice to “address negative perceptions in key markets overseas to maintain confidence in Hong Kong” and to “underscore the strengths and attributes that differentiate Hong Kong from other cities in the region.”
It also wanted advice on how to “bring out the success of ‘one country, two systems’” policy — under which Hong Kong has been ruled under China after its handover of sovereignty from Britain in 1997.
The document called for “an initial assessment of Hong Kong’s image overseas” following the wave of protests that started in June, along with a proposed PR strategy to cope with the crisis.
The campaign sought to target “business persons, investors, entrepreneurs, politicians and high-income leisure and business travelers” from the Asia-Pacific, Europe and North America. The submission period ended late last month.
Out of the three international PR firms contacted by the Guardian that reportedly turned down the government, Ogilvy said in an e-mail it had decided not to proceed “after an assessment regarding the availability of our internal resources to meet required timelines as stated in the RFP [Request for Proposal].”
Another firm declined to comment.
Public relations experts told the Guardian they were not surprised that the government was turned down, because it is widely reviled by large numbers of Hong Kongers for its response to the protests.
The wave of demonstrations over a controversial extradition bill started in June, but have since morphed into a broader anti-government campaign seeking democratic reforms.
Lam belatedly withdraw the suspended bill two weeks ago, but that failed to stop the protests as resentment against police brutality in the past three months grew and many lambasted the withdrawal as too little, too late.
PR campaigns are no use unless concrete actions are taken by the government to address public demands, said Andy Ho, a veteran public relations consultant and a PR adviser to the chief executive from 2006 to 2012.
Against such a background, Ho said a recent Hong Kong government advertisement placed in international newspapers early this month was ineffective.
The advertisement said: “What you read, see, hear — or “share” on social media — is just one piece of a complex social, economic and political jigsaw puzzle. It is a puzzle that we will solve on our own.”
“But here we are, in the 15th week [of protests], we can’t see much of an ability to solve [the puzzle],” Ho said. “You watch TV and see riot police, tear gas, metro stations closing, airport lockdown... This is having a completely opposite effect.”
UPDATED (3:40pm): A suspected gas explosion at a shopping mall in Taichung this morning has killed four people and injured 20 others, as emergency responders continue to investigate. The explosion occurred on the 12th floor of the Shin Kong Mitsukoshi in Situn District (西屯) at 11:33am. One person was declared dead at the scene, while three people were declared deceased later after receiving emergency treatment. Another 20 people sustained major or minor injuries. The Taichung Fire Bureau said it received a report of the explosion at 11:33am and sent rescuers to respond. The cause of the explosion is still under investigation, it said. The National Fire
ACCOUNTABILITY: The incident, which occured at a Shin Kong Mitsukoshi Department Store in Taichung, was allegedly caused by a gas explosion on the 12th floor Shin Kong Group (新光集團) president Richard Wu (吳昕陽) yesterday said the company would take responsibility for an apparent gas explosion that resulted in four deaths and 26 injuries at Shin Kong Mitsukoshi Zhonggang Store in Taichung yesterday. The Taichung Fire Bureau at 11:33am yesterday received a report saying that people were injured after an explosion at the department store on Section 3 of Taiwan Boulevard in Taichung’s Situn District (西屯). It sent 56 ambulances and 136 paramedics to the site, with the people injured sent to Cheng Ching Hospital’s Chung Kang Branch, Wuri Lin Shin Hospital, Taichung Veterans General Hospital or Chung
‘TAIWAN-FRIENDLY’: The last time the Web site fact sheet removed the lines on the US not supporting Taiwanese independence was during the Biden administration in 2022 The US Department of State has removed a statement on its Web site that it does not support Taiwanese independence, among changes that the Taiwanese government praised yesterday as supporting Taiwan. The Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, produced by the department’s Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, previously stated that the US opposes “any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side; we do not support Taiwan independence; and we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means.” In the updated version published on Thursday, the line stating that the US does not support Taiwanese independence had been removed. The updated
‘LAWFUL USE’: The last time a US warship transited the Taiwan Strait was on Oct. 20 last year, and this week’s transit is the first of US President Donald Trump’s second term Two US military vessels transited the Taiwan Strait from Sunday through early yesterday, the Ministry of National Defense said in a statement, the first such mission since US President Donald Trump took office last month. The two vessels sailed south through the Strait, the ministry said, adding that it closely monitored nearby airspace and waters at the time and observed nothing unusual. The ministry did not name the two vessels, but the US Navy identified them as the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Ralph Johnson and the Pathfinder-class survey ship USNS Bowditch. The ships carried out a north-to-south transit from