An independent tribunal sitting in London on Monday concluded that the killing of detainees in China for organ transplants is continuing and victims include imprisoned members of the Falun Gong movement.
The China Tribunal, chaired by Geoffrey Nice, who was a prosecutor at the international criminal tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, said in a unanimous determination at the end of its hearings it was “certain that Falun Gong were used for forced organ harvesting.”
The tribunal has been taking evidence from medical experts, human rights investigators and others.
Among those killed, it has been alleged, are members of religious minorities such as Falun Gong. Persecution of the group began in 1999 after it had attracted tens of millions of followers and came to be seen as a threat to the Chinese Communist Party.
There is less evidence about the treatment of Tibetans, Uighur Muslims and some Christian sects.
The panel said that its findings were “indicative” of genocide, but it had not been clear enough to make a positive ruling, particularly since some Falun Gong prisoners had been released and profit was also a likely motive.
China in 2014 announced that it would stop removing organs for transplantation from executed prisoners and has dismissed the claims as politically motivated and untrue.
The tribunal was initiated by the International Coalition to End Transplant Abuse in China and its members, all of whom worked without payment, included medical experts.
Waiting times for transplantation offered by hospitals in China were extraordinarily low, often only a couple of weeks, the tribunal said.
Investigators calling hospitals in China inquiring about transplants for patients have in the past been told that the source of some organs were from Falun Gong members, the tribunal said.
Former Falun Gong and Uighur inmates gave testimony of undergoing repeated medical testing in Chinese jails.
Jennifer Zeng (曾錚), a Falun Gong member who was imprisoned for a year in a female labor camp, gave evidence to the China Tribunal about what she said were repeated medical checkups and blood tests to which inmates were subjected.
“On the day we were transferred to the labor camp, we were taken to a medical facility where we underwent physical checkups. We were interrogated about what diseases we had and I told them I had hepatitis,” she told reporters.
“The second time, after about a month in the camp, everyone was handcuffed and put in a van and taken to a huge hospital. That was for a more thorough physical checkup. We were given X-rays,” she said.
“On the third occasion in the camp, they were drawing blood from us. We were all told to line up in the corridor and the test were given,” she added.
Zeng, who fled China in 2001, did not see any direct evidence of forced organ removal, but since reading other accounts, she has questioned whether the tests were part of a medical selection process.
In her statement to the tribunal, she said: “Inmates of the labor camp were not allowed to exchange contact details, so there was no way to trace each other after we were released. When anyone disappeared from the camp, I would assume that she was released and had gone home.”
“But in reality that cannot be confirmed, as I had no way to trace others after my release and I now fear they might have been taken to a hospital and had their organs removed without consent and thus killed in the process,” she added.
Zeng said that she hoped the hoped the tribunal’s findings would prompt action.
“I hope more countries will pass laws to forbid their own citizens from going to China to do organ transplants,” she told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.
As many as 90,000 transplant operations are being carried out in China each year, the tribunal estimated, a far higher figure than that given by official government sources.
There have been calls for the British Parliament to ban patients from traveling to China for transplant surgery. More than 40 lawmakers from all parties have backed the motion.
Taiwan, Israel, Italy and Spain already enforce such restrictions.
China has insisted that it adheres to international medical standards that require organ donations to be made by consent and without any financial charges.
It declined to participate in the tribunal.
The tribunal heard reports of extraction of kidneys from executed prisoners from as far back as the 1970s.
However, most of the evidence came from 2000 onward.
Chinese government regulations say that human organ donation must be voluntary and without payment, a spokesman for the Chinese embassy in London said on Monday.
“We hope that the British people will not be misled by rumors,” the spokesman said in an e-mailed statement sent before the tribunal’s final judgement was released.
Additional reporting by Thomson Reuters Foundation
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday said that China has “no right to represent Taiwan,” but stressed that the nation was willing to work with Beijing on issues of mutual interest. “The Republic of China has already put down roots in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu,” Lai said in his first Double Ten National Day address outside the Presidential Office Building in Taipei. “And the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China [PRC] are not subordinate to each other.” “The People’s Republic of China has no right to represent Taiwan,” he said at the event marking the 113th National Day of
REACTION TO LAI: A former US official said William Lai took a step toward stability with his National Day speech and the question was how Beijing would respond US Secretary of State Antony Blinken yesterday warned China against taking any “provocative” action on Taiwan after Beijing’s reaction to President William Lai’s (賴清德) speech on Double Ten National Day on Thursday. Blinken, speaking in Laos after an ASEAN East Asia Summit, called the speech by Lai, in which he vowed to “resist annexation,” a “regular exercise.” “China should not use it in any fashion as a pretext for provocative actions,” Blinken told reporters. “On the contrary, we want to reinforce — and many other countries want to reinforce — the imperative of preserving the status quo, and neither party taking any
SPEECH IMPEDIMENT? The state department said that using routine celebrations or public remarks as a pretext for provocation would undermine peace and stability Beijing’s expected use of President William Lai’s (賴清德) Double Ten National Day speech today as a pretext for provocative measures would undermine peace and stability, the US Department of State said on Tuesday. Taiwanese officials have said that China is likely to launch military drills near Taiwan in response to Lai’s speech as a pretext to pressure the nation to accept its sovereignty claims. A state department spokesperson said it could not speculate on what China would or would not do. “However, it is worth emphasizing that using routine annual celebrations or public remarks as a pretext or excuse for provocative or coercive