The Transitional Justice Commission’s investigative review of victims of political persecution during the White Terror era would include victims of the 228 Incident, and would be a rehabilitative process that could exonerate up to 13,401 people, commission Deputy Chairman Chang Tien-chin (張天欽) said.
The Transitional Justice Act (促進轉型正義條例) mandates the commission to rehabilitate victims of political persecution, authorizing it to open inquiries into treason trials that were conducted during the White Terror era.
The 228 Incident refers to the then-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime’s violent military crackdown on popular protests and uprisings that began on Feb. 28, 1947. The massacres, which resulted in up to tens of thousands of dead and missing, marked the beginning of the White Terror era, when a state of emergency was declared and the nation was placed under martial law.
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
The commission has enlisted several institutional partners in its work, including the 228 Memorial Foundation, the National Human Rights Museum and multiple judicial agencies, sources said.
The review process involves the reopening of legal files from the 228 Incident, the White Terror era and subsequent litigations initiated by victims and survivors seeking redress.
After the commission closes an inquiry, it can bring the case to the courts, which could rescind the sedition or espionage conviction of the victim and authorize restitution for any property confiscated in connection with political crimes.
It is expected that the commission would soon move to exonerate a group of victims that includes Chung Yi-jen (鍾逸人), who led anti-KMT guerrilla group Unit 27 during the massacres, the sources said.
Guilty convictions from those trials would all be overturned and the commission is in the process of reviewing the original court verdicts, Chang said.
The commission would publish the results of its inquiries at the appropriate time and request the courts to rescind the convictions in accordance with the law, he said, adding that the commission’s work to restore justice has “progressed very quickly.”
Rehabilitation and restitution of 228 Incident victims proved more complicated than the process for victims of the White Terror era, because an overwhelming majority of the 228 Incident victims were killed without a trial, Chang said.
The commission is working with the 228 Memorial Foundation to organize the documentary evidence for the minority of 228 Incident victims who did receive a trial, Chang said.
The commission plans to exonerate victims in groups so that surviving family members and descendants do not need to wait until the inquiry’s conclusion to receive results, he said.
“Most of those who died in the 228 Incident were shot in the street without a trial being conducted, while others were taken and executed on the authority of some order written on a piece of paper. There were no legal procedures to speak of,” foundation executive director Yang Cheng-long (楊振隆) said.
Deaths during the 228 Incident were therefore distinct from those who were killed later during the Whiter Terror era, whose victims would have gone through show trials, he said.
The foundation has been turning relevant findings over to the commission, with some documents revealing that some Unit 27 members were given trials, he said.
"Those who were tried were the survivors. Those who did not have the benefit of a trial were killed, almost to a man,” Yang said, adding that another 200 survivors were sentenced to the Taiwan Garrison Command’s labor camp.
The foundation is handling a number of cases of political persecution that occurred during the White Terror era, including that of Uyongu’e Yatauyungana (高一生), who was spared by a court despite his role in the Tsou uprising during the 228 Incident, but was later executed for espionage during the White Terror era, he said.
For years, those victims have demanded restitution from the government, he said.
Meanwhile, the commission has completed drafts for the regulations governing the investigation of historical truths involving the authoritarian era, as well as the regulations governing the commission’s investigative procedures.
The two sets of regulations, for which the Executive Yuan has published a preview, will help the commission in accomplishing its mandate to investigate the perpetrators of political persecution during the 228 Incident and the White Terror era.
The regulations governing the investigation of historical truths involving the authoritarian era empower the commission to open inquiries into human rights violations and to establish the degree to which perpetrators were responsible for the political persecution that they carried out on behalf of the state.
As the regulations stipulate, people who were affected by acts of state repression — or academics and researchers — could bring forward issues, events or facts that they believe the commission should consider, Chang said
The commission plans to launch investigations into several high-profile historical events, Chang added.
CELEBRATION: The PRC turned 75 on Oct. 1, but the Republic of China is older. The PRC could never be the homeland of the people of the ROC, Lai said The People’s Republic of China (PRC) could not be the “motherland” of the people of the Republic of China (ROC), President William Lai (賴清德) said yesterday. Lai made the remarks in a speech at a Double Ten National Day gala in Taipei, which is part of National Day celebrations that are to culminate in a fireworks display in Yunlin County on Thursday night next week. Lai wished the country a happy birthday and called on attendees to enjoy the performances and activities while keeping in mind that the ROC is a sovereign and independent nation. He appealed for everyone to always love their
‘EXTREME PRESSURE’: Beijing’s goal is to ‘force Taiwan to make mistakes,’ Admiral Tang Hua said, adding that mishaps could serve as ‘excuses’ for launching a blockade China’s authoritarian expansionism threatens not only Taiwan, but the rules-based international order, the navy said yesterday, after its top commander said in an interview that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could blockade the nation at will. The object of Beijing’s expansionist activities is not limited to Taiwan and its use of pressure is not confined to specific political groups or people, the navy said in a statement. China utilizes a mixture of cognitive warfare and “gray zone” military activities to pressure Taiwan, the navy said, adding that PLA sea and air forces are compressing the nation’s defensive depth. The navy continues to
MAKING PROGRESS: Officials and industry leaders who participated in a defense forum last month agreed that Taiwan has the capabilities to work with the US, the report said Taiwan’s high-tech defense industry is to enhance collaboration with the US to produce weapons needed for self-defense, the Ministry of National Defense said in a report to the Legislative Yuan. Deputy Minister of National Defense Hsu Yen-pu (徐衍璞) discussed building regional and global industry alliances with US partners at the US-Taiwan Defense Industry Conference in Philadelphia held from Sept. 22 to Tuesday last week, the ministry said in the declassified portion of the report. The visit contributed to maintaining bilateral ties, facilitated Taiwan’s efforts to acquire weapons and equipment, and strengthened the resilience of the two nation’s defense industries, it said. Taiwan-US ties
CONCERNS: Allowing the government, political parties or the military to own up to 10 percent of a large media firm is a risk Taiwan cannot afford to take, a lawyer said A Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator has proposed amendments to allow the government, political parties and the military to indirectly invest in broadcast media, prompting concerns of potential political interference. Under Article 1 of the Satellite Broadcasting Act (衛星廣播電視法), the government and political parties — as well as foundations established with their endowments, and those commissioned by them — cannot directly or indirectly invest in satellite broadcasting businesses. A similar regulation is in the Cable Radio and Television Act (有線廣播電視法). “The purpose of banning the government, political parties and the military from investing in the media is to prevent them from interfering