The Transitional Justice Commission’s investigative review of victims of political persecution during the White Terror era would include victims of the 228 Incident, and would be a rehabilitative process that could exonerate up to 13,401 people, commission Deputy Chairman Chang Tien-chin (張天欽) said.
The Transitional Justice Act (促進轉型正義條例) mandates the commission to rehabilitate victims of political persecution, authorizing it to open inquiries into treason trials that were conducted during the White Terror era.
The 228 Incident refers to the then-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime’s violent military crackdown on popular protests and uprisings that began on Feb. 28, 1947. The massacres, which resulted in up to tens of thousands of dead and missing, marked the beginning of the White Terror era, when a state of emergency was declared and the nation was placed under martial law.
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
The commission has enlisted several institutional partners in its work, including the 228 Memorial Foundation, the National Human Rights Museum and multiple judicial agencies, sources said.
The review process involves the reopening of legal files from the 228 Incident, the White Terror era and subsequent litigations initiated by victims and survivors seeking redress.
After the commission closes an inquiry, it can bring the case to the courts, which could rescind the sedition or espionage conviction of the victim and authorize restitution for any property confiscated in connection with political crimes.
It is expected that the commission would soon move to exonerate a group of victims that includes Chung Yi-jen (鍾逸人), who led anti-KMT guerrilla group Unit 27 during the massacres, the sources said.
Guilty convictions from those trials would all be overturned and the commission is in the process of reviewing the original court verdicts, Chang said.
The commission would publish the results of its inquiries at the appropriate time and request the courts to rescind the convictions in accordance with the law, he said, adding that the commission’s work to restore justice has “progressed very quickly.”
Rehabilitation and restitution of 228 Incident victims proved more complicated than the process for victims of the White Terror era, because an overwhelming majority of the 228 Incident victims were killed without a trial, Chang said.
The commission is working with the 228 Memorial Foundation to organize the documentary evidence for the minority of 228 Incident victims who did receive a trial, Chang said.
The commission plans to exonerate victims in groups so that surviving family members and descendants do not need to wait until the inquiry’s conclusion to receive results, he said.
“Most of those who died in the 228 Incident were shot in the street without a trial being conducted, while others were taken and executed on the authority of some order written on a piece of paper. There were no legal procedures to speak of,” foundation executive director Yang Cheng-long (楊振隆) said.
Deaths during the 228 Incident were therefore distinct from those who were killed later during the Whiter Terror era, whose victims would have gone through show trials, he said.
The foundation has been turning relevant findings over to the commission, with some documents revealing that some Unit 27 members were given trials, he said.
"Those who were tried were the survivors. Those who did not have the benefit of a trial were killed, almost to a man,” Yang said, adding that another 200 survivors were sentenced to the Taiwan Garrison Command’s labor camp.
The foundation is handling a number of cases of political persecution that occurred during the White Terror era, including that of Uyongu’e Yatauyungana (高一生), who was spared by a court despite his role in the Tsou uprising during the 228 Incident, but was later executed for espionage during the White Terror era, he said.
For years, those victims have demanded restitution from the government, he said.
Meanwhile, the commission has completed drafts for the regulations governing the investigation of historical truths involving the authoritarian era, as well as the regulations governing the commission’s investigative procedures.
The two sets of regulations, for which the Executive Yuan has published a preview, will help the commission in accomplishing its mandate to investigate the perpetrators of political persecution during the 228 Incident and the White Terror era.
The regulations governing the investigation of historical truths involving the authoritarian era empower the commission to open inquiries into human rights violations and to establish the degree to which perpetrators were responsible for the political persecution that they carried out on behalf of the state.
As the regulations stipulate, people who were affected by acts of state repression — or academics and researchers — could bring forward issues, events or facts that they believe the commission should consider, Chang said
The commission plans to launch investigations into several high-profile historical events, Chang added.
MILESTONE: The foreign minister called the signing ‘a major step forward in US-Taiwan relations,’ while the Presidential Office said it was a symbol of the nations’ shared values US President Donald Trump on Tuesday signed into law the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act, which requires the US Department of State to regularly review and update guidelines governing official US interactions with Taiwan. The new law is an amendment to the Taiwan Assurance Act of 2020 focused on reviewing guidelines on US interactions with Taiwan. Previously, the state department was required to conduct a one-time review of its guidance governing relations with Taiwan, but under the new bill, the agency must conduct a review “not less than every five years.” It must then submit an updated report based on its findings “not later
The Presidential Office today thanked the US for enacting the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act, which requires the US Department of State to regularly review and update guidelines governing official US interactions with Taiwan. The new law, signed by US President Donald Trump yesterday, is an amendment to the Taiwan Assurance Act of 2020 focused on reviewing guidelines on US interactions with Taiwan. Previously, the department was required to conduct a one-time review of its guidance governing relations with Taiwan, but under the new bill, the agency must conduct such a review "not less than every five years." It must then submit an updated
CROSS-STRAIT COLLABORATION: The new KMT chairwoman expressed interest in meeting the Chinese president from the start, but she’ll have to pay to get in Beijing allegedly agreed to let Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) around the Lunar New Year holiday next year on three conditions, including that the KMT block Taiwan’s arms purchases, a source said yesterday. Cheng has expressed interest in meeting Xi since she won the KMT’s chairmanship election in October. A source, speaking on condition of anonymity, said a consensus on a meeting was allegedly reached after two KMT vice chairmen visited China’s Taiwan Affairs Office Director Song Tao (宋濤) in China last month. Beijing allegedly gave the KMT three conditions it had to
STAYING ALERT: China this week deployed its largest maritime show of force to date in the region, prompting concern in Taipei and Tokyo, which Beijing has brushed off Deterring conflict over Taiwan is a priority, the White House said in its National Security Strategy published yesterday, which also called on Japan and South Korea to increase their defense spending to help protect the first island chain. Taiwan is strategically positioned between Northeast and Southeast Asia, and provides direct access to the second island chain, with one-third of global shipping passing through the South China Sea, the report said. Given the implications for the US economy, along with Taiwan’s dominance in semiconductors, “deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority,” it said. However, the strategy also reiterated