Tobacco manufacturer Philip Morris will be forced to pay millions of US dollars in legal fees to Australia after its failed case against plain packaging laws.
Big tobacco companies have fought vigorously against former Australian prime minister Julia Gillard’s government’s plain packaging laws since they were introduced in 2011.
By banning distinctive-colored cigarette packaging and logos, Australia’s laws went further than the advertising bans and graphic health warnings introduced in many other countries.
Philip Morris, Imperial Tobacco and Japan Tobacco quickly attempted to have the laws overturned through a constitutional challenge in the High Court of Australia, which they lost in 2012.
Philip Morris Asia then took a case to the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) in The Hague in 2012. It tried to use the conditions of a 1993 trade agreement between Australia and Hong Kong to argue a ban on trademarks breached foreign investment provisions.
The corporate giant not only lost, but was criticized by the court, which found the case to be “an abuse of rights.”
The PCA published its decision over the weekend on the payment of costs, although the decision was made in March.
The decision found Philip Morris Asia liable to pay Australia’s claim for legal costs.
The final figure was kept secret, but Fairfax Media reported it as being up to A$50 million (US$38 million).
Australia successfully argued Philip Morris must pay its court fees and expenses, the cost of expert witnesses, travel and solicitors and counsel, as well as interest.
Australia told the court its claim was modest and was a small proportion of what the tobacco giant had sought in damages.
It said Philip Morris had sought to challenge a public health measure of critical importance to Australia, making it important to “mount a robust and comprehensive response to all aspects of the claim.”
Philip Morris had tried to argue the government’s costs were unreasonable for a “legal team that consisted primarily of public servants.”
The company argued that two similar countries, Canada and the US, had never claimed more than US$4.5 million and US$3 million respectively in costs and fees.
“The claimant emphasizes that, even excluding the fees of four outside counsel, the respondent’s government lawyers claim over [redacted] in fees, even though Australia itself pays them ‘very modest government salaries,’” the PCA decision read.
The court found Australia’s claim was reasonable.
“Taking into account the complexity of issues of domestic and international law relevant in this procedure, particularly for a government team usually not engaged in such disputes, the tribunal does not consider that any of these costs claimed by the respondent were unreasonable and should not have been incurred,” it said.
“In making this assessment, the tribunal also takes into consideration the significant stakes involved in this dispute in respect of Australia’s economic, legal and political framework and in particular the relevance of the outcome in respect of Australia’s policies in matters of public health,” it said.
Earlier this year, big tobacco failed in a separate bid to have the laws overturned by the WTO. The decision was widely seen as a green light for more countries to follow Australia’s lead.
INVESTIGATION: The case is the latest instance of a DPP figure being implicated in an espionage network accused of allegedly leaking information to Chinese intelligence Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) member Ho Jen-chieh (何仁傑) was detained and held incommunicado yesterday on suspicion of spying for China during his tenure as assistant to then-minister of foreign affairs Joseph Wu (吳釗燮). The Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office said Ho was implicated during its investigation into alleged spying activities by former Presidential Office consultant Wu Shang-yu (吳尚雨). Prosecutors said there is reason to believe Ho breached the National Security Act (國家安全法) by leaking classified Ministry of Foreign Affairs information to Chinese intelligence. Following interrogation, prosecutors petitioned the Taipei District Court to detain Ho, citing concerns over potential collusion or tampering of evidence. The
‘FORM OF PROTEST’: The German Institute Taipei said it was ‘shocked’ to see Nazi symbolism used in connection with political aims as it condemned the incident Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), who led efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), was released on bail of NT$80,000 yesterday amid an outcry over a Nazi armband he wore to questioning the night before. Sung arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office for questioning in a recall petition forgery case on Tuesday night wearing a red armband bearing a swastika, carrying a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf and giving a Nazi salute. Sung left the building at 1:15am without the armband and apparently covering the book with a coat. This is a serious international scandal and Chinese
Seventy percent of middle and elementary schools now conduct English classes entirely in English, the Ministry of Education said, as it encourages schools nationwide to adopt this practice Minister of Education (MOE) Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) is scheduled to present a report on the government’s bilingual education policy to the Legislative Yuan’s Education and Culture Committee today. The report would outline strategies aimed at expanding access to education, reducing regional disparities and improving talent cultivation. Implementation of bilingual education policies has varied across local governments, occasionally drawing public criticism. For example, some schools have required teachers of non-English subjects to pass English proficiency
TRADE: The premier pledged safeguards on ‘Made in Taiwan’ labeling, anti-dumping measures and stricter export controls to strengthen its position in trade talks Products labeled “made in Taiwan” must be genuinely made in Taiwan, Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) said yesterday, vowing to enforce strict safeguards against “origin laundering” and initiate anti-dumping investigations to prevent China dumping its products in Taiwan. Cho made the remarks in a discussion session with representatives from industries in Kaohsiung. In response to the US government’s recent announcement of “reciprocal” tariffs on its trading partners, President William Lai (賴清德) and Cho last week began a series of consultations with industry leaders nationwide to gather feedback and address concerns. Taiwanese and US officials held a videoconference on Friday evening to discuss the