Members of the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) yesterday met Chinese delegates to the Taipei-Shanghai City Forum with a noisy protest at Taipei International Airport (Songshan airport), with members jostling police and shouting slogans.
About 30 TSU members, outnumbered and surrounded by police officers, shouted: “Reject unification. Communist bandits get out,” as the delegation, led by Shanghai Municipal Committee United Front Work Department Director Sha Hailin (沙海林), walked out of the heavily guarded airport shortly before noon.
Police restrained enraged TSU members when a group of demonstrators in support of Sha’s arrival raised a banner printed with greetings, while a TSU member who broke a police cordon and entered the airport concourse to protest the delegation was immediately arrested.
Photo: Chang Chia-ming, Taipei Times
A group of Atayal Aborigines from Hsinchu County gathered at the airport to welcome Sha, singing songs and shouting: “Leader Sha, we love you.”
Escorted by police and bodyguards, Sha waved to his supporters then left the airport immediately.
Former TSU legislator Chou Ni-an (周倪安) said it was unimaginable that Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) would welcome a top United Front official with open arms.
Photo: Chang Chia-ming, Taipei Times
Instead of holding talks with his Shanghai counterpart, Ko was for some reason willing to meet Sha, whose attendance in his capacity as a United Front official was inappropriate for the mayoral forum, Chou said.
A military official should replace Ko to participate in the forum instead, Chou added.
“We hope Ko does not become a participant in China’s United Front operations. President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has refused to accept the so-called ‘1992 consensus.’ Does Ko plan to step over the line and offer an opportunity for China to assert the ‘1992 consensus’?” she said.
The “1992 consensus” refers to a supposed understanding between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese government that both sides of the Strait acknowledge there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
“Only an evil country that intends to annex other countries would establish a United Front Work Department, but Ko welcomes the Chinese Communist Party with open arms. The TSU issues a formal protest,” Chou said.
“Ko saying that the nation has stigmatized the United Front operation is as indiscreet as his inviting a United Front figure to Taiwan,” TSU official Tsai Feng-wen (蔡豐文) said, referring to comments by Ko earlier this month that the United Front is a stigmatized term in Taiwan, but is a neutral word in China.
TSU Department of Organization deputy director Chang Chao-lin (張兆林) said Ko is trying to play a broker’s role amid slowed cross-strait interactions, in a bid to accumulate political capital.
“Such an act is intended to curry favor with pan-blue voters, but it will estrange Ko from the naturally independent younger generation,” Chang said.
TSU Youth Department deputy director Hsu Ya-chi (許亞齊) said the party does not plan to boycott international or intercity interactions, but it is compelled to prevent China’s attempted annexation of Taiwan under the banner of intercity exchange.
The TSU yesterday evening staged a protest outside Taipei City Hall, where a banquet was held in honor of the Chinese delegation.
Hsu said the TSU would shadow Sha’s stay in Taiwan with protests.
Separately yesterday, Ko hailed the forum between Taipei and Shanghai as an opportunity to break a stalemate in official cross-strait exchanges.
The forum would serve as an opportunity for the two sides to engage in friendly exchanges, Ko added.
Additional reporting by CNA
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday said that China has “no right to represent Taiwan,” but stressed that the nation was willing to work with Beijing on issues of mutual interest. “The Republic of China has already put down roots in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu,” Lai said in his first Double Ten National Day address outside the Presidential Office Building in Taipei. “And the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China [PRC] are not subordinate to each other.” “The People’s Republic of China has no right to represent Taiwan,” he said at the event marking the 113th National Day of
SPEECH IMPEDIMENT? The state department said that using routine celebrations or public remarks as a pretext for provocation would undermine peace and stability Beijing’s expected use of President William Lai’s (賴清德) Double Ten National Day speech today as a pretext for provocative measures would undermine peace and stability, the US Department of State said on Tuesday. Taiwanese officials have said that China is likely to launch military drills near Taiwan in response to Lai’s speech as a pretext to pressure the nation to accept its sovereignty claims. A state department spokesperson said it could not speculate on what China would or would not do. “However, it is worth emphasizing that using routine annual celebrations or public remarks as a pretext or excuse for provocative or coercive
CONCERNS: Allowing the government, political parties or the military to own up to 10 percent of a large media firm is a risk Taiwan cannot afford to take, a lawyer said A Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator has proposed amendments to allow the government, political parties and the military to indirectly invest in broadcast media, prompting concerns of potential political interference. Under Article 1 of the Satellite Broadcasting Act (衛星廣播電視法), the government and political parties — as well as foundations established with their endowments, and those commissioned by them — cannot directly or indirectly invest in satellite broadcasting businesses. A similar regulation is in the Cable Radio and Television Act (有線廣播電視法). “The purpose of banning the government, political parties and the military from investing in the media is to prevent them from interfering
RSS