The People First Party (PFP) yesterday said that its lawmakers would not provide the signatures the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus requires to file a request for a constitutional interpretation on the passage of an act dealing with ill-gotten party assets.
The PFP openly rejected the KMT’s request to jointly file a request in the legislature for a constitutional interpretation on the Act Governing the Handling of Ill-gotten Properties by Political Parties and Their Affiliate Organizations (政黨及其附隨組織不當取得財產處理條例), which was passed on Monday last week.
As it requires at least one-third, or 38, legislators to file a request for a constitutional interpretation and the KMT caucus has only 35 seats, the KMT needs to form an alliance with lawmakers from other parties to reach the threshold.
Photo: Chen Yu-fu, Taipei Times
The KMT caucus last week said that it had approached the PFP for its support.
However, the PFP publicly spurned that invitation yesterday, with PFP Deputy Secretary-General Liu Wen-hsiung (劉文雄) saying that the party “supports fairness and transitional justice.”
“It is not possible [for PFP legislators] to underwrite the request,” he added.
In a statement, the party also denied a rumor that the PFP’s rejection of the request was related to PFP Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) vying with KMT Legislator Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) for the chairmanship of the Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF).
“The PFP has always held the view that the KMT’s party assets should be dealt with legally and reasonably, and had also put forward such a policy during the [presidential and legislative] election campaign period; when the legislature was reviewing the bill, the PFP caucus also voted for its passage, so there is no question that the PFP would form an alliance with the KMT to file a request for a constitutional interpretation,” the statement said.
“The KMT should take this opportunity to reflect and make changes to its structure,” it said, adding that “people with a vested interest” are trying to distract public attention from the KMT’s assets by spreading rumors about an alleged SEF tussle.
The party also called on the media not to try to second-guess the party’s position on the cross-strait relationship.
“The cross-strait relationship is in an awkward and delicate state that cannot be turned around by any one person, but requires everybody’s strength to keep it stable and to reduce friction,” the statement said.
Meanwhile, Non-Partisan Solidarity Union Legislator May Chin (高金素梅) has reportedly agreed to provide her signature to the KMT, which leaves the party needing another two.
Taiwan’s Lee Chia-hao (李佳豪) on Sunday won a silver medal at the All England Open Badminton Championships in Birmingham, England, a career best. Lee, 25, took silver in the final of the men’s singles against world No. 1 Shi Yuqi (石宇奇) of China, who won 21-17, 21-19 in a tough match that lasted 51 minutes. After the match, the Taiwanese player, who ranks No. 22 in the world, said it felt unreal to be challenging an opponent of Shi’s caliber. “I had to be in peak form, and constantly switch my rhythm and tactics in order to score points effectively,” he said. Lee got
EMBRACING TAIWAN: US lawmakers have introduced an act aiming to replace the use of ‘Chinese Taipei’ with ‘Taiwan’ across all Washington’s federal agencies A group of US House of Representatives lawmakers has introduced legislation to replace the term “Chinese Taipei” with “Taiwan” across all federal agencies. US Representative Byron Donalds announced the introduction of the “America supports Taiwan act,” which would mandate federal agencies adopt “Taiwan” in place of “Chinese Taipei,” a news release on his page on the US House of Representatives’ Web site said. US representatives Mike Collins, Barry Moore and Tom Tiffany are cosponsors of the legislation, US political newspaper The Hill reported yesterday. “The legislation is a push to normalize the position of Taiwan as an autonomous country, although the official US
CHANGE OF TONE: G7 foreign ministers dropped past reassurances that there is no change in the position of the G7 members on Taiwan, including ‘one China’ policies G7 foreign ministers on Friday took a tough stance on China, stepping up their language on Taiwan and omitting some conciliatory references from past statements, including to “one China” policies. A statement by ministers meeting in Canada mirrored last month’s Japan-US statement in condemning “coercion” toward Taiwan. Compared with a G7 foreign ministers’ statement in November last year, the statement added members’ concerns over China’s nuclear buildup, although it omitted references to their concerns about Beijing’s human rights abuses in Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong. Also missing were references stressing the desire for “constructive and stable relations with China” and
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday said it has lodged a protest with Pretoria after the name of the Taipei Liaison Office in South Africa was changed to the “Taipei Commercial Office” on the South African Department of International Relations and Cooperation’s (DIRCO) Web site. In October last year, the South African government asked Taiwan to relocate the Taipei Liaison Office, the nation’s de facto embassy, out of Pretoria. It later agreed to continue negotiating through official channels, but in January asked that the office be relocated by the end of this month. As of the middle of last month, DIRCO’s Web
RSS