Japan has put its military on alert for a possible North Korean ballistic missile launch after indications that Pyongyang is preparing for a test firing, two people with direct knowledge of the order said yesterday.
“Increased activity at North Korea’s missile site suggests that there may be a launch in the next few weeks,” said one of the sources, both of whom declined to be identified, because they are not authorized to talk to the media.
Tension rose in East Asia this month after North Korea’s fourth nuclear test, this time of what it said was a hydrogen bomb.
Photo: Reuters
A missile test coming so soon after the nuclear test would raise concerns that North Korea plans to fit nuclear warheads on its missiles, giving it the capability to launch a strike against South Korea, Japan and possibly targets as far away as the US west coast.
Japanese Minister of Defense Gen Nakatani has ordered Aegis destroyers that operate in the Sea of Japan to be ready to target any North Korean projectiles heading for Japan, the sources said.
A Ministry of Defense spokesman declined to say whether MIM-104 PAC-3 Patriot missile batteries and the Aegis destroyers had been deployed to respond to any threat from North Korea
The advanced Aegis vessels are able to track multiple targets and are armed with SM-3 missiles designed to destroy incoming warheads in space before they re-enter the atmosphere and fall to their targets.
Japan also has Patriot missile batteries around Tokyo and other sites to provide a last line of defense as warheads near the ground.
However, rather than a direct attack, Japan is more concerned that debris from a missile test could fall on its territory.
Meanwhile, South Korea yesterday indicated an increased willingness to host an advanced US anti-missile defense system as the activity detected at the North’s missile site revived talk of deploying a system opposed by China and Russia.
US military officials have said the sophisticated system, called the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD), was needed in South Korea, which faces the threat of an increasingly advanced North Korean missile program.
“If THAAD is deployed by the US military in [South] Korea, it will be helpful for our security and defense,” South Korean Ministry of National Defense spokesman Kim Min-seok said.
Previously, South Korea was reluctant to openly discuss the possibility of the deployment, as it tried to walk a fine line between its closest ally, the US, and its biggest trade partner, China.
The US maintains 28,500 military personnel in the country, a legacy of the 1950-1953 Korean War, which ended in a truce and left the two Koreas in a technical state of war.
China is North Korea’s major ally, but in recent years South Korea has forged increasingly strong ties with China.
“We believe that any country, when striving for its own security, should also consider other countries’ security interests and regional peace and stability,” Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokeswoman Hua Chunying (華春瑩) told a briefing when asked about the possibility of THAAD being deployed in South Korea.
The system has radar that can track multiple ballistic missiles up to 2,000km away, a range which would reach deep into China and Russia.
THAAD is built by Lockheed Martin, and costs an estimated US$829.2 million apiece. Some THAAD opponents in South Korea instead propose developing an indigenous missile defense system.
China and Russia, which are among the five international powers that have sought to negotiate with the North to persuade it to abandon its nuclear weapons, have spoken against stationing the THAAD system in South Korea.
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday said that China has “no right to represent Taiwan,” but stressed that the nation was willing to work with Beijing on issues of mutual interest. “The Republic of China has already put down roots in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu,” Lai said in his first Double Ten National Day address outside the Presidential Office Building in Taipei. “And the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China [PRC] are not subordinate to each other.” “The People’s Republic of China has no right to represent Taiwan,” he said at the event marking the 113th National Day of
SPEECH IMPEDIMENT? The state department said that using routine celebrations or public remarks as a pretext for provocation would undermine peace and stability Beijing’s expected use of President William Lai’s (賴清德) Double Ten National Day speech today as a pretext for provocative measures would undermine peace and stability, the US Department of State said on Tuesday. Taiwanese officials have said that China is likely to launch military drills near Taiwan in response to Lai’s speech as a pretext to pressure the nation to accept its sovereignty claims. A state department spokesperson said it could not speculate on what China would or would not do. “However, it is worth emphasizing that using routine annual celebrations or public remarks as a pretext or excuse for provocative or coercive
CONCERNS: Allowing the government, political parties or the military to own up to 10 percent of a large media firm is a risk Taiwan cannot afford to take, a lawyer said A Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator has proposed amendments to allow the government, political parties and the military to indirectly invest in broadcast media, prompting concerns of potential political interference. Under Article 1 of the Satellite Broadcasting Act (衛星廣播電視法), the government and political parties — as well as foundations established with their endowments, and those commissioned by them — cannot directly or indirectly invest in satellite broadcasting businesses. A similar regulation is in the Cable Radio and Television Act (有線廣播電視法). “The purpose of banning the government, political parties and the military from investing in the media is to prevent them from interfering