The legislature’s Social Welfare and Environmental Hygiene Committee yesterday approved a series of draft amendments to the Water Pollution Control Act (水汙染防治法), seeking to impose stiffer penalties on firms found to have illegally discharged wastewater or sewage.
If the draft amendments clear the legislative floor, firms that discharge wastewater, or arbitrarily dump or fail to properly handle sewage will be subject to a maximum fine of NT$20 million (US$658,000), a significant increase from NT$60,000.
Businesses could also face mandatory shutdowns and rescission of their discharge permits if they fail to make the necessary improvements within a statutory period.
Photo: CNA
In addition, owners of firms that emit potentially hazardous wastewater without permission could be sentenced to as many as seven years in prison, which would be commutable to a NT$20 million fine if the transgression causes illness, with the maximum length of prison terms increasing to between 10 years and life should illicit conduct lead to disability or death.
The preliminary passage of the draft amendments was prompted primarily by the Kaohsiung District Court’s decision in October last year to issue a fine of just NT$3 million to Advanced Semiconductor Engineering Inc (AEC, 日月光半導體), the world’s largest IC packaging and testing services provider for dumping massive amounts of wastewater into the city’s Houjin River (後勁溪).
Other major changes proposed by the draft amendments include increasing the maximum fine from NT$120,000 to NT$600,000 for proprietors of establishments engaged in animal husbandry who are caught illegally discharging sewage; offering whistleblowers a certain percentage of any fines as a reward; and barring firms found violating the act from receiving government benefits for three years.
Attorney and environmentalist Thomas Chan (詹順貴) lauded the draft bill’s preliminary passage, saying that he was particularly pleased to see Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators finally willing to join the right side.
Citizen of the Earth, Taiwan director Tsai Hue-hsun (蔡卉荀) said she was glad to see environmentalists’ push for the amendments finally coming to fruition.
However, Tsai said she was disappointed by the Council of Agriculture’s insistence on not setting the maximum fine for animal husbandry firms caught breaking the rules at NT$1.2 million, which the council said was a bid to protect small businesses.
“If the council is willing to offer fallow subsidies to rice farmers, why not use government resources to help small pig farms improve their wastewater treatment systems?” Tsai said.
Meanwhile, the Finance Committee approved an amendment to adjust downward the ceiling of revolving interest rates that domestic credit card and cash-advance card issuers can charge cardholders from 20 to 15 percent.
According to the Civil Law (民法), the ceiling for annual interest rates is generally set at 20 percent for the private sector. In a bid to ease the burden on hundreds of thousands of cardholders, the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) last year issued an administrative order asking card issuers to keep their revolving interest rates at 16 percent or lower.
Some lawmakers, led by KMT Legislator Chen Ken-te (陳根德), had proposed setting the ceiling as low as 12 percent.
“Even at the commission’s request, I doubt if all the banks have followed the administrative order,” Chen said yesterday.
The commission and lawmakers reached a consensus on the issue, which led the committee to pass the preliminary review of a proposed amendment to the Banking Act (銀行法), adding a clause to cap revolving interest rates at 15 percent.
If the proposal is approved by the Legislative Yuan, the regulation could take effect in September at the earliest.
FSC Chairman William Tseng (曾銘宗) said that internal research showed that banks might be able to cover the cost of revolving credit with a revolving interest rate set at between 13 and 15 percent.
“Local banks should still receive sufficient payments under the move to cover their costs,” Tseng said.
Banking Bureau director-general Austin Chan (詹庭禎) said that if the amendment were to take effect later this year, it would benefit 800,000 to 900,000 cardholders.
However, the move could result in net losses of between NT$400 million and NT$500 million per year for the banking sector, Chan said, citing estimates made by the Bankers’ Association of the Republic of China (銀行公會).
The Finance Committee yesterday passed another amendment to the Banking Act, to extend the maximum limitation of a local bank’s reinvestment to 40 percent of its net asset worth.
The investment cap was previously set at 40 percent of a bank’s registered capital, which showed a gap of more than NT$1 trillion between the nation’s banking sector and the sector’s net asset worth.
The move might offer domestic banks more chances for mergers and acquisitions worth as much as NT$500 billion across the sector.
CALL FOR SUPPORT: President William Lai called on lawmakers across party lines to ensure the livelihood of Taiwanese and that national security is protected President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday called for bipartisan support for Taiwan’s investment in self-defense capabilities at the christening and launch of two coast guard vessels at CSBC Corp, Taiwan’s (台灣國際造船) shipyard in Kaohsiung. The Taipei (台北) is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels, and the Siraya (西拉雅) is the Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) first-ever ocean patrol vessel, the government said. The Taipei is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels with a displacement of about 4,000 tonnes, Lai said. This ship class was ordered as a result of former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) 2018
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s