While the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) appears to be trying to downplay the political squabble between President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) over the past month, members of the party’s Central Standing Committee refuse to let the issue go and are demanding explanations.
The Ma-Wang showdown began on Aug. 31, when Prosecutor-General Huang Shih-ming (黃世銘) briefed the president on information gathered via a wiretap allegedly showing improper lobbying by Wang on behalf of Democratic Progressive Party caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘).
Observers say that Ma, who doubles as KMT chairman, then tried to remove Wang from his post as legislative speaker, by suspending his party membership saying Wang had brought “shame on Taiwan’s judiciary and democratic history.”
Wang took the KMT court and the Taipei District Court granted him an injunction that let the speaker provisionally retain his party membership. The Taiwan High Court upheld the ruling after the KMT appealed it.
Ahead of its 19th party congress, which is to take place on Nov. 10 in Greater Taichung, the KMT is working overtime to print invitations to the summit. However, sources say the party has not addressed Wang’s invitation to: “Chairman Wang, of the party of chairmen” as it has in the past — a detail that symbolized Wang’s high stature within the KMT — but has instead addressed the invitation as: “To Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng.”
Meanwhile, the KMT Central Evaluation and Disciplinary Committee has also quietly removed the notice informing member of Wang’s membership revocation from the headquarters doors, in stark contrast to the very public methods party officials used to announce the suspension last month.
According to sources, no matter which side KMT members took in the Ma-Wang saga, many feel they cannot simply accept that the past month’s events be breezily pushed aside by the party leadership, adding that some KMT representatives may ask for explanations at the congress.
The source said that some KMT members were extremely critical of the party headquarters’ actions, saying that by taking a stance in what it had deemed “an issue with no middle ground,” the headquarters had put the party in a catch-22 situation.
KMT Central Standing Committee member Lee Te-wei (李德維) said that while it was good that party headquarters is toning down its stance on the squabble, the issue of justice must be dealt with.
“It must provide an answer, an explanation, or the members of the party are all fools,” Lee said.
Ma supporters who criticized Wang now find themselves in an awkward situation, while others like the son of former vice president Lien Chan (連戰), Sean Lien (連勝文), who backed Wang were heavily criticized by overseas party members.
“The party headquarters should give us justice,” Lee said.
“Wang’s stance on the revocation of his party membership has never changed. He considers himself ‘a member of the KMT forever,’ it was the party central leadership that has continually shifted its position,” Lee added.
“It started the issue and said Wang shamed Taiwan’s democracy, but now is softening its tone,” Lee said, but added: “The wound has been made and someone needs to step down to show they are willing to take responsibility.”
The US Department of State yesterday criticized Beijing over its misrepresentation of the US’ “one China” policy in the latest diplomatic salvo between the two countries over a bid by Taiwan to regain its observer status at the World Health Assembly, the decisionmaking body of the WHO. “The PRC [People’s Republic of China] continues to publicly misrepresent U.S. policy,” Department of State spokesman Ned Price wrote on Twitter. “The United States does not subscribe to the PRC’s ‘one China principle’ — we remain committed to our longstanding, bipartisan one China policy, guided by the Taiwan Relations Act, Three Joint Communiques, and
FATES LINKED: The US president said that sanctions on Russia over Ukraine must exact a ‘long-term price,’ because otherwise ‘what signal does that send to China?’ US President Joe Biden yesterday vowed that US forces would defend Taiwan militarily in the event of a Chinese attack in his strongest statement to date on the issue. Beijing is already “flirting with danger,” Biden said following talks with Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida in Tokyo, in which the pair agreed to monitor Chinese naval activity and joint Chinese-Russian exercises. Asked if Washington was willing to get involved militarily to defend Taiwan, he replied: “Yes.” “That’s the commitment we made,” Biden said. “We agreed with the ‘one China’ policy, we signed on to it ... but the idea that it can be
INFORMATION LEAKED: Documents from Xinjiang purportedly showed top leaders in Beijing calling for a forceful crackdown and even orders to shoot to kill Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) yesterday held a videoconference with UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet as she visited Xinjiang during a mission overshadowed by fresh allegations of Uighur abuses and fears she is being used as a public relations tool. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has been accused of detaining more than 1 million Uighurs and other Muslim minorities in the region as part of a years-long crackdown the US and lawmakers in other Western nations have labeled a “genocide.” China denies the allegations. Bachelet was expected to visit the cities of Urumqi and Kashgar on a six-day tour. The US
SUBTLE? While Biden said the US policy of ‘strategic ambiguity’ on Taiwan had not changed, the group targeted China and Russia without naming them Leaders of Australia, India, Japan and the US yesterday warned against attempts to “change the status quo by force,” as concerns grow about whether China could invade Taiwan. The issue of Taiwan loomed over a leadership meeting in Tokyo of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad) nations — the US, Japan, Australia and India — who stressed their determination to ensure a free and open Indo-Pacific region in the face of an increasingly assertive China, although Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida said the group was not targeting any one country. The four leaders said in a joint statement issued after their talks