The High Court’s Greater Taichung branch on Wednesday ordered a retrial in the breach of trust case involving former Taiwan Sugar Corp (Taisugar, 台糖) chairman Wu Nai-jen (吳乃仁) and former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislator Hong Chi-chang (洪奇昌), which was widely viewed as flawed.
Hong was sentenced on March 13 to two years and four months in prison, while Wu, a former DPP secretary-general, received a term of three years and 10 months after the Greater Taichung branch upheld their conviction in a case involving the 2003 sale of property belonging to Taisugar in the then-Taichung County in 2003.
Wu was accused of giving in, as Taisugar chairman, to Hong’s lobbying for Chun Lung Co (春龍開發公司), a property developer, to ensure that it won the right to purchase a plot of land it was renting from Taisugar. The court ruled that Wu had violated Taisugar’s “rent only” policy on its properties and the sale had caused Taisugar losses.
The two men were to begin serving on May 6, but applied for temporary respite and transfer of jurisdiction.
They said that they were ready to go through the entire legal process “all over again.”
Hong had requested a retrial on April 8, citing new evidence, and asked for a Control Yuan investigation into the case. He cited a list of Taisugar land sales, compiled by the state-controlled company and submitted to the Legislative Yuan on March 15, as new evidence that proved the company no longer had a “rent only” policy on its properties.
A Control Yuan reply on April 17 demanded the Ministry of Justice investigate.
The DPP’s Central Standing Committee on April 24 called for a retrial or extraordinary appeal.
Wednesday’s order for a retrial of Hong and Wu also impacted codefendants Pan Chung-hao (潘忠豪), Chun Long Co general manager, and Lu Yu-mei (呂鈺玫), a Taisugar official. Pan, who was sentenced to three years, seven months — a sentence that could be commuted to a fine and five months’ imprisonment — had reported to prison on May 6. He was released immediately, while Lu was not required to begin serving his term.
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday said that China has “no right to represent Taiwan,” but stressed that the nation was willing to work with Beijing on issues of mutual interest. “The Republic of China has already put down roots in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu,” Lai said in his first Double Ten National Day address outside the Presidential Office Building in Taipei. “And the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China [PRC] are not subordinate to each other.” “The People’s Republic of China has no right to represent Taiwan,” he said at the event marking the 113th National Day of
SPEECH IMPEDIMENT? The state department said that using routine celebrations or public remarks as a pretext for provocation would undermine peace and stability Beijing’s expected use of President William Lai’s (賴清德) Double Ten National Day speech today as a pretext for provocative measures would undermine peace and stability, the US Department of State said on Tuesday. Taiwanese officials have said that China is likely to launch military drills near Taiwan in response to Lai’s speech as a pretext to pressure the nation to accept its sovereignty claims. A state department spokesperson said it could not speculate on what China would or would not do. “However, it is worth emphasizing that using routine annual celebrations or public remarks as a pretext or excuse for provocative or coercive
CONCERNS: Allowing the government, political parties or the military to own up to 10 percent of a large media firm is a risk Taiwan cannot afford to take, a lawyer said A Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator has proposed amendments to allow the government, political parties and the military to indirectly invest in broadcast media, prompting concerns of potential political interference. Under Article 1 of the Satellite Broadcasting Act (衛星廣播電視法), the government and political parties — as well as foundations established with their endowments, and those commissioned by them — cannot directly or indirectly invest in satellite broadcasting businesses. A similar regulation is in the Cable Radio and Television Act (有線廣播電視法). “The purpose of banning the government, political parties and the military from investing in the media is to prevent them from interfering
RSS