The government yesterday defended the 12-year compulsory education program amid protests from Taipei’s top high-school students, who share concerns that the program will damage the quality of education.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Minister of Education Chiang Wei-ling (蔣偉寧) announced that compulsory education would be extended from nine to 12 years in 2014, as the Ministry of Education outlined the details of the program at National Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall.
Ma said the ministry is “fully prepared” to extend the program, which aims to eliminate entrance exams and encourage multiple school admissions, brushing aside concerns about the negative impact on the quality of education.
Photo: Wang Yi-sung, Taipei Times
“Under the entrance exam policy, some top-tier high schools have stood out among other schools and they attract students with the top scores. In the future, we hope the new program will make all high schools shining stars, bridging the gap between top-tier high schools and other schools in terms of quality of education,” Ma said.
Under the 12-year compulsory education program, exam-free admissions to high schools will be applied to 75 percent of schools in 2014 and all schools will accept exam-free admissions by 2019.
Chiang said entrance exams would account for 25 percent of schools with “special programs” in 2014, which help top-tier schools attract elite students, but the ministry plans to cut the percentage of schools year by year in order to reach the goal of exam-free admissions under the program.
“Our goal is to let every school have elite students, instead of keeping all elite students at a small number of schools,” he said.
The program drew opposition from a group of students from Taipei Municipal Jianguo High School and Taipei First Girls’ High School, who protested against the ministry rushing through the program without a comprehensive plan.
Holding protest signs outside the hall, about 50 students said that without a comprehensive plan, students would still face a heavy burden, as they would struggle with the various kinds of admission channels.
“We are not against exam-free admissions, we are opposing the program because it is being launched without a detailed plan, such as the design of the curriculum. Eventually, students will become guinea pigs for this hasty policy,” a student said.
Chiang said the ministry would not delay the launch of the program, and he called on students and parents to embrace it.
“We are well prepared and the 12-year compulsory education program will not be delayed. The ministry will continue to communicate with high schools and our goal of ending the myth of the top-tier high school will not change,” he said.
At a separate setting yesterday, the Humanistic Education Foundation said it was regrettable that “the Ministry of Education plays the nation for fools and proposes what appears to be a 12-year compulsory education system” when, in fact, it is not.
According to the foundation, a 12-year compulsory program, like the current nine-year compulsory program, should ideally let children enter college without discrimination, learning what they need to learn and being taught in a way that fits the individual student.
The ministry’s version of the 12-year compulsory program is only removing the basic competency tests and the rankings system, the foundation said, adding that the subsequent contraction in the recruitment of higher quality students would lead to vicious competition, benefiting only cram schools.
Additional reporting by Hu Ching-hui
Translated by Jake Chung, staff writer
The US Department of State yesterday criticized Beijing over its misrepresentation of the US’ “one China” policy in the latest diplomatic salvo between the two countries over a bid by Taiwan to regain its observer status at the World Health Assembly, the decisionmaking body of the WHO. “The PRC [People’s Republic of China] continues to publicly misrepresent U.S. policy,” Department of State spokesman Ned Price wrote on Twitter. “The United States does not subscribe to the PRC’s ‘one China principle’ — we remain committed to our longstanding, bipartisan one China policy, guided by the Taiwan Relations Act, Three Joint Communiques, and
FATES LINKED: The US president said that sanctions on Russia over Ukraine must exact a ‘long-term price,’ because otherwise ‘what signal does that send to China?’ US President Joe Biden yesterday vowed that US forces would defend Taiwan militarily in the event of a Chinese attack in his strongest statement to date on the issue. Beijing is already “flirting with danger,” Biden said following talks with Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida in Tokyo, in which the pair agreed to monitor Chinese naval activity and joint Chinese-Russian exercises. Asked if Washington was willing to get involved militarily to defend Taiwan, he replied: “Yes.” “That’s the commitment we made,” Biden said. “We agreed with the ‘one China’ policy, we signed on to it ... but the idea that it can be
INFORMATION LEAKED: Documents from Xinjiang purportedly showed top leaders in Beijing calling for a forceful crackdown and even orders to shoot to kill Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) yesterday held a videoconference with UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet as she visited Xinjiang during a mission overshadowed by fresh allegations of Uighur abuses and fears she is being used as a public relations tool. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has been accused of detaining more than 1 million Uighurs and other Muslim minorities in the region as part of a years-long crackdown the US and lawmakers in other Western nations have labeled a “genocide.” China denies the allegations. Bachelet was expected to visit the cities of Urumqi and Kashgar on a six-day tour. The US
SUBTLE? While Biden said the US policy of ‘strategic ambiguity’ on Taiwan had not changed, the group targeted China and Russia without naming them Leaders of Australia, India, Japan and the US yesterday warned against attempts to “change the status quo by force,” as concerns grow about whether China could invade Taiwan. The issue of Taiwan loomed over a leadership meeting in Tokyo of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad) nations — the US, Japan, Australia and India — who stressed their determination to ensure a free and open Indo-Pacific region in the face of an increasingly assertive China, although Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida said the group was not targeting any one country. The four leaders said in a joint statement issued after their talks