The National Development Fund (NDF) did not have three board members and one supervisor at Yu Chang Biologics Co (宇昌生技股份有限公司) when Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) was company chairperson, contradicting claims made by the DPP, Council for Economic Planning and Development Minister Christina Liu (劉憶如) said yesterday after releasing four documents related to the formation of the company.
“These documents prove that the seats obtained by the NDF did not reflect its share of investment in Yu Chang and they confirm that the DPP’s claims are wrong,” Liu, who is the current convener of the fund, told a press conference.
On Friday, Liu said the fund, which held a 40 percent stake in Yu Chang — now known as TaiMed Biologics Inc (中裕新藥股份有限公司) — only obtained one seat as a board member in addition to one non-voting supervisor position — Academia Sinica president Wong Chi-huey (翁啟惠) and then-Council for Economic Planning and Development chairperson Ho Mei-yueh (何美玥) — following the company’s first shareholder meeting. The meeting was chaired by Tsai on Sept. 3, 2007.
However, based on a plan made on Aug. 31, 2007, the fund should have had three seats on the company’s eight-seat board Liu said.
DPP spokesperson Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁) said on Saturday that from the time the company was created, the fund had always held three director spots and one supervisor position.
The DPP then filed a lawsuit against Liu, saying she was spreading rumors and false statements for the purpose of either getting a candidate elected or impeding another’s election chances. It was the second lawsuit the party has filed against Liu over the Yu Chang case.
However, Liu said the documents released yesterday confirmed that the question she raised on Friday was legitimate and that the DPP had provided “incorrect” information to the public.
“The DPP should admit that its lawsuit against me is malicious,” Liu said.
Liu said, following a request by the fund, scientists David Ho (何大一) and Chen Lan-bo (陳良博) were elected as the fund’s representatives on the Yu Chang board on Sep. 29, 2007, but that Ho eventually resigned his seat, bringing the number of board members from the fund to less than four.
“Why did the NDF give up its own rights in the Yu Chang case?” she asked.
Liu said she would keep raising questions about the case until Tsai and the DPP properly answer the ones she has already asked.
In response, Tsai’s campaign spokesperson Hsu Chia-ching (徐佳青) said that while Liu had submitted “new questions,” there was no substantial context to them.
“We don’t think it is necessary to respond to her questions again since we have detailed our explanation to all the questions she has posed,” Hsu said.
Three board members and a supervisor were allocated to represent the fund, Hsu said, but Chen and Ho — who are US citizens — were not officially on the board until they finalized the necessary paperwork in October 2007.
Tsai, who was on a campaign trip in the south yesterday, said in Pingtung County that Liu’s comments and behavior have been “a little bit out of control and unreasonable.”
“The entire process of the formation of Yu Chang is transparent and well-documented and all the related information can be found in the government archives,” Tsai said
“Minister Liu also said she did not think it was a scandal, but now she is coming up with all these questions … I do think President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) owes the public an apology when a government official sets a bad example by crossing the line of neutrality and failing to recognize his or her duty,” Tsai added.
On Liu’s questioning of her qualifications as chairperson of a biotechnology company, saying she could not be compared with Morris Chang (張忠謀) in the semiconductor industry or Steve Chan (詹啟賢) in the biotech industry, Tsai said she joined the company to try to help contribute to a strategically important industry and never saw herself as having the same status as Morris Chang.
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday said that China has “no right to represent Taiwan,” but stressed that the nation was willing to work with Beijing on issues of mutual interest. “The Republic of China has already put down roots in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu,” Lai said in his first Double Ten National Day address outside the Presidential Office Building in Taipei. “And the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China [PRC] are not subordinate to each other.” “The People’s Republic of China has no right to represent Taiwan,” he said at the event marking the 113th National Day of
SPEECH IMPEDIMENT? The state department said that using routine celebrations or public remarks as a pretext for provocation would undermine peace and stability Beijing’s expected use of President William Lai’s (賴清德) Double Ten National Day speech today as a pretext for provocative measures would undermine peace and stability, the US Department of State said on Tuesday. Taiwanese officials have said that China is likely to launch military drills near Taiwan in response to Lai’s speech as a pretext to pressure the nation to accept its sovereignty claims. A state department spokesperson said it could not speculate on what China would or would not do. “However, it is worth emphasizing that using routine annual celebrations or public remarks as a pretext or excuse for provocative or coercive
CONCERNS: Allowing the government, political parties or the military to own up to 10 percent of a large media firm is a risk Taiwan cannot afford to take, a lawyer said A Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator has proposed amendments to allow the government, political parties and the military to indirectly invest in broadcast media, prompting concerns of potential political interference. Under Article 1 of the Satellite Broadcasting Act (衛星廣播電視法), the government and political parties — as well as foundations established with their endowments, and those commissioned by them — cannot directly or indirectly invest in satellite broadcasting businesses. A similar regulation is in the Cable Radio and Television Act (有線廣播電視法). “The purpose of banning the government, political parties and the military from investing in the media is to prevent them from interfering
RSS