Leaked US cables show that China’s diplomatic service was “unhappy” with what was interpreted as Chinese President Hu Jintao’s (胡錦濤) “tacit acceptance” of the “diplomatic truce” strategy advocated by President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九).
When he assumed the presidency on May 20, 2008, Ma sought a “diplomatic truce” to end a longstanding tug-of-war with China in which both countries tried to poach each other’s diplomatic allies by offering large sums of foreign aid.
A number of leaked US cables released by WikiLeaks suggest that Chinese officials in charge of diplomatic affairs and Taiwan affairs have been divided on the issue.
Photo: George Tsorng, Taipei Times
A cable dated Jan. 16, 2009, from the US embassy in Beijing quoted Jin Canrong (金燦榮), a professor at Renmin University, saying that “the MFA [Ministry of Foreign Affairs] is still opposed to the ceasefire, in part because it means ‘fewer ambassadorships’ will be available to MFA career diplomats.”
“Jin claimed the MFA is particularly unhappy because five countries that currently recognize Taiwan are willing to switch their recognition to the PRC [People’s Republic of China], but the MFA has been forced to give up this ‘achievement’ because of pressure from the TAO [Taiwan Affairs Office] to observe the ‘diplomatic ceasefire,’” the cable said.
Jin said the “ceasefire” would hold as long as “Hu continues to side with the TAO” over the MFA, the cable said.
The same cable made a mention of a fifth point addressed by Hu in his speech delivered on Dec. 31, 2009, marking the then-30th anniversary of the “New Year’s Message to Taiwan Compatriots” that stated “avoiding internal strife in external affairs is conducive to furthering the overall interests of the Chinese nation.”
The statement was interpreted by Chinese academics as Hu’s “tacit acceptance” of Ma’s “diplomatic truce” strategy, the cable said.
Zhou Zhihuai (周志懷), Secretary-General of the National Society of Taiwan Studies (NSTS), was quoted in the cable as telling the US embassy that “Hu could not formally mention the ‘diplomatic ceasefire’ because it implies the existence of two countries.”
The cable quoted unidentified US experts, who met with Ma on Jan. 13 that year, as saying that “Ma said this phrase and Hu’s endorsement of a ‘comprehensive economic cooperation agreement’ were the two positive responses from Hu to Ma’s proposals.”
Meanwhile, in another cable dated Aug. 20, 2008, Zhou “commented that the PRC is observing a diplomatic truce, but admitted the issue is divisive in Chinese policymaking circles” as he described to US officials “three political fault lines in the Chinese Government’s internal debate over the diplomatic truce.”
“The first is an institutional dispute between the MFA, which wants to score more diplomatic allies, and the TAO, which wants to avoid inflaming public opinion in Taiwan by orchestrating humiliating diplomatic defections. The second division is along age lines, with older cadres wanting to keep the diplomatic battle going and younger ones less inclined to fight for the last few small states. Lastly, a difference of opinion exists between scholars who are in favor of the truce and some older government officials, who tend to be more cautious,” Zhou was quoted as saying in the cable.
Another cable originating from the American Institute in Taiwan dated Sept. 21, 2009, quoted Minister of Foreign Affairs Timothy Yang (楊進添) as saying that “it was not clear that PRC diplomats had responded to President Ma’s ‘diplomatic truce’ by being less aggressive in efforts to isolate Taiwan.”
“One possible explanation, Yang said, was that PRC diplomats overseas had not yet been given instructions on how to deal with their Taiwan counterparts. Certainly, he noted, the PRC Foreign Ministry was notoriously conservative on Taiwan issues. Finally, it was possible that instances of apparent ill-will by PRC diplomats reflected individual actions, rather than a coordinated MFA effort,” the cable said.
MILESTONE: The foreign minister called the signing ‘a major step forward in US-Taiwan relations,’ while the Presidential Office said it was a symbol of the nations’ shared values US President Donald Trump on Tuesday signed into law the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act, which requires the US Department of State to regularly review and update guidelines governing official US interactions with Taiwan. The new law is an amendment to the Taiwan Assurance Act of 2020 focused on reviewing guidelines on US interactions with Taiwan. Previously, the state department was required to conduct a one-time review of its guidance governing relations with Taiwan, but under the new bill, the agency must conduct a review “not less than every five years.” It must then submit an updated report based on its findings “not later
CROSS-STRAIT COLLABORATION: The new KMT chairwoman expressed interest in meeting the Chinese president from the start, but she’ll have to pay to get in Beijing allegedly agreed to let Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) around the Lunar New Year holiday next year on three conditions, including that the KMT block Taiwan’s arms purchases, a source said yesterday. Cheng has expressed interest in meeting Xi since she won the KMT’s chairmanship election in October. A source, speaking on condition of anonymity, said a consensus on a meeting was allegedly reached after two KMT vice chairmen visited China’s Taiwan Affairs Office Director Song Tao (宋濤) in China last month. Beijing allegedly gave the KMT three conditions it had to
STAYING ALERT: China this week deployed its largest maritime show of force to date in the region, prompting concern in Taipei and Tokyo, which Beijing has brushed off Deterring conflict over Taiwan is a priority, the White House said in its National Security Strategy published yesterday, which also called on Japan and South Korea to increase their defense spending to help protect the first island chain. Taiwan is strategically positioned between Northeast and Southeast Asia, and provides direct access to the second island chain, with one-third of global shipping passing through the South China Sea, the report said. Given the implications for the US economy, along with Taiwan’s dominance in semiconductors, “deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority,” it said. However, the strategy also reiterated
‘BALANCE OF POWER’: Hegseth said that the US did not want to ‘strangle’ China, but to ensure that none of Washington’s allies would be vulnerable to military aggression Washington has no intention of changing the “status quo” in the Taiwan Strait, US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said on Saturday, adding that one of the US military’s main priorities is to deter China “through strength, not through confrontation.” Speaking at the annual Reagan National Defense Forum in Simi Valley, California, Hegseth outlined the US Department of Defense’s priorities under US President Donald Trump. “First, defending the US homeland and our hemisphere. Second, deterring China through strength, not confrontation. Third, increased burden sharing for us, allies and partners. And fourth, supercharging the US defense industrial base,” he said. US-China relations under
RSS