A notice issued by the Ministry of Education asking the country’s largest college bulletin board system (BBS) — Professional Technology Temple (PTT) — to tone down its political rhetoric has attracted outrage after being posted online.
The one-page notice was sent last month to National Taiwan University, which oversees the PTT site frequented by hundreds of thousands of users daily.
Citing complaints received by Premier Wu Den-yih’s (吳敦義) office, the notice said political articles dominate the PTT’s Gossip Board and that it wished to see political staffers who try to “manipulate” Netizens’ opinions on the board removed from “an educational network” to give users a cleaner environment.
PHOTO: CHU PEI-HSIUNG, TAIPEI TIMES
Gossip Board administrators should step up their management of Internet use and comments that “are not used for educational or research purposes,” the notice said.
The notice was posted on the Internet by one of the administrators of the forum, who claimed it was forwarded to her through school officials. Within hours hundreds of angry messages had been posted online on Internet forums and social networking Web sites.
Most of the comments voiced concerns about what they said was an attempt to assume control of, and regulate parts of the PTT, which include more than 1.5 million registered members and tens of thousands of discussion boards.
“The Ministry of Education’s concerns on PTT: Does this represent a new Internet ‘White Terror’?” one commentator wrote.
Another wrote: “The ministry now wants PTT to tone it down after we made fun of [former president] Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) for eight years.”
Some others joked that the government might now see posts on the discussion board as a threat to national security.
A Facebook event calling on Internet users to demand the resignation of both Minister of Education Wu Ching-ji (吳清基) and the premier over the letter had attracted 2,350 responses as of yesterday.
A commentator on the page wrote that after two years, “the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] has begun to instill its martial law on the Internet.”
“At least under the eight-year Democratic Progressive Party [DPP] administration, we wouldn’t be arrested or tried for saying the [wrong] things,” the user added.
DPP lawmakers argued in the legislature yesterday that as an institution of higher learning, the university should be able to make its own decisions.
“A university should be training their students to think independently, to be able to take a stance on society,” DPP Legislator Kuan Bi-ling (管碧玲) said. “The comments and actions of students are self-regulatory and the school’s best course of action is to give them this freedom.”
When asked for comment, Wu Ching-ji defended his ministry’s move, saying the notice was simply a “friendly reminder.”
Wu Ching-ji denied the ministry was trying to interfere with freedom of speech on the Internet, adding that university students should be responsible for their behavior.
The ministry’s Computer Center director Ho Jung-kuei (何榮桂) said political discussion of an academic nature is allowed on the nation’s academic BBS, but political attacks or campaigning should be banned.
Unconvinced, Kuan of the legislative Education and Culture Committee said the minister should step down over the controversy.
Meanwhile, NTU secretary-general Sebastian Liao (廖咸浩) was quoted by the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) as saying that as the PTT is an independent student-run organization, school administrators would not step in.
The PTT was originally founded by information engineering students at the school in 1995. It is currently run by the student-managed Electronic BBS Research Society.
The US Department of State yesterday criticized Beijing over its misrepresentation of the US’ “one China” policy in the latest diplomatic salvo between the two countries over a bid by Taiwan to regain its observer status at the World Health Assembly, the decisionmaking body of the WHO. “The PRC [People’s Republic of China] continues to publicly misrepresent U.S. policy,” Department of State spokesman Ned Price wrote on Twitter. “The United States does not subscribe to the PRC’s ‘one China principle’ — we remain committed to our longstanding, bipartisan one China policy, guided by the Taiwan Relations Act, Three Joint Communiques, and
FATES LINKED: The US president said that sanctions on Russia over Ukraine must exact a ‘long-term price,’ because otherwise ‘what signal does that send to China?’ US President Joe Biden yesterday vowed that US forces would defend Taiwan militarily in the event of a Chinese attack in his strongest statement to date on the issue. Beijing is already “flirting with danger,” Biden said following talks with Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida in Tokyo, in which the pair agreed to monitor Chinese naval activity and joint Chinese-Russian exercises. Asked if Washington was willing to get involved militarily to defend Taiwan, he replied: “Yes.” “That’s the commitment we made,” Biden said. “We agreed with the ‘one China’ policy, we signed on to it ... but the idea that it can be
INFORMATION LEAKED: Documents from Xinjiang purportedly showed top leaders in Beijing calling for a forceful crackdown and even orders to shoot to kill Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) yesterday held a videoconference with UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet as she visited Xinjiang during a mission overshadowed by fresh allegations of Uighur abuses and fears she is being used as a public relations tool. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has been accused of detaining more than 1 million Uighurs and other Muslim minorities in the region as part of a years-long crackdown the US and lawmakers in other Western nations have labeled a “genocide.” China denies the allegations. Bachelet was expected to visit the cities of Urumqi and Kashgar on a six-day tour. The US
SUBTLE? While Biden said the US policy of ‘strategic ambiguity’ on Taiwan had not changed, the group targeted China and Russia without naming them Leaders of Australia, India, Japan and the US yesterday warned against attempts to “change the status quo by force,” as concerns grow about whether China could invade Taiwan. The issue of Taiwan loomed over a leadership meeting in Tokyo of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad) nations — the US, Japan, Australia and India — who stressed their determination to ensure a free and open Indo-Pacific region in the face of an increasingly assertive China, although Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida said the group was not targeting any one country. The four leaders said in a joint statement issued after their talks