Despite a private meeting in Taipei with President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), US Democratic Senator Arlen Specter is not supporting Taiwan’s request to buy advanced F-16C/D fighter planes.
Ma’s efforts to convince Specter on the need for the aircraft would appear to have failed.
In a report to the US Senate, just published in the Congressional Record, Specter says: “It appears to me that we might consider revising our policy on the sale of arms to Taiwan where we have an irritant to mainland China that doesn’t really accomplish very much.”
“We recently have sold Taiwan some US$4.6 billion worth, which is very substantial, but if the People’s Republic of China decided to invade Taiwan, the defenses they have and their request for additional fighter planes, which has not been granted — all of that would not be sufficient to stem the tide.”
Specter met with Ma on Aug. 13 when the president argued that Taiwan needed the fighters to prevent the balance of military power across the Taiwan Strait from shifting further in China’s favor.
According to reports, Ma said the purpose of procuring the F-16s was not to provoke war but to beef up defense capability. Ma tried to persuade Specter to support Taiwan’s fighter request.
At a later meeting with US Senator Roland Burris, an Illinois Democrat, Ma said: “Our American friends can rest assured that the aircraft would be only for defense purposes and national security.”
However, in his report to Congress, Specter says: “Although the President of Taiwan was very interested in having arms sold by the United States, I pressed him on whether it was realistic, really a measure that they could defend themselves, or whether it was symbolic. I did that in the discussions with other officials in Taiwan.”
He said in his report that during a meeting with Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) on Aug. 16, he asked about the importance of F-16 sales to Taiwan and their “real benefit to any cross-strait conflict.”
Specter added: “I was informed that the sales are both substantive and symbolic in showing backing for Taiwan and aiding in any future cross-strait negotiations and talks. Further, Taiwan has a duty to its people to provide defense of the island.”
However, both Ma and Wang appear to have had little impact.
Specter’s report will not be welcomed by the US-Taiwan Business Council, which announced this week that it would hold the ninth annual US-Taiwan Defense Industry Conference from Oct. 3 to Oct. 5 in Cambridge, Maryland.
The council is a strong supporter of the F-16 sale and its conference focuses on US-Taiwan defense and military cooperation.
This year it will examine the future cross-strait threat, the Taiwanese military’s new focus on disaster rescue and relief, and asymmetric options for Taiwan’s armed forces.
“The Conference is the most important private event reviewing US-Taiwan defense and security issues each year,” council president Rupert Hammond-Chambers said.
Wallace Gregson, assistant secretary of defense for Asia and Pacific security affairs, and Andrew Shapiro, assistant secretary of state for political-military affairs, will deliver keynote speeches at the conference, a statement released by the council said, adding that a senior Taiwanese defense official will also speak.
In line with Ministry of National Defense protocol, the Taiwanese official was not named.
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY CNA
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
Taiwan’s Lee Chia-hao (李佳豪) on Sunday won a silver medal at the All England Open Badminton Championships in Birmingham, England, a career best. Lee, 25, took silver in the final of the men’s singles against world No. 1 Shi Yuqi (石宇奇) of China, who won 21-17, 21-19 in a tough match that lasted 51 minutes. After the match, the Taiwanese player, who ranks No. 22 in the world, said it felt unreal to be challenging an opponent of Shi’s caliber. “I had to be in peak form, and constantly switch my rhythm and tactics in order to score points effectively,” he said. Lee got
EMBRACING TAIWAN: US lawmakers have introduced an act aiming to replace the use of ‘Chinese Taipei’ with ‘Taiwan’ across all Washington’s federal agencies A group of US House of Representatives lawmakers has introduced legislation to replace the term “Chinese Taipei” with “Taiwan” across all federal agencies. US Representative Byron Donalds announced the introduction of the “America supports Taiwan act,” which would mandate federal agencies adopt “Taiwan” in place of “Chinese Taipei,” a news release on his page on the US House of Representatives’ Web site said. US representatives Mike Collins, Barry Moore and Tom Tiffany are cosponsors of the legislation, US political newspaper The Hill reported yesterday. “The legislation is a push to normalize the position of Taiwan as an autonomous country, although the official US
CHANGE OF TONE: G7 foreign ministers dropped past reassurances that there is no change in the position of the G7 members on Taiwan, including ‘one China’ policies G7 foreign ministers on Friday took a tough stance on China, stepping up their language on Taiwan and omitting some conciliatory references from past statements, including to “one China” policies. A statement by ministers meeting in Canada mirrored last month’s Japan-US statement in condemning “coercion” toward Taiwan. Compared with a G7 foreign ministers’ statement in November last year, the statement added members’ concerns over China’s nuclear buildup, although it omitted references to their concerns about Beijing’s human rights abuses in Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong. Also missing were references stressing the desire for “constructive and stable relations with China” and