Praise for President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) performances in the debate yesterday on the proposed economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) appears to be divided along party lines.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lo Shu-lei (羅淑蕾), a member of the legislature’s Finance Committee, lauded Ma’s performance in the debate, saying the president, who doubles as KMT chairman, has erased public doubts about an ECFA. She added that Ma had taken a new approach by emphasizing the government’s plan to negotiate the pact step by step and promising to terminate the negotiations if the nation would not benefit from the agreement.
DPP lawmakers, on the other hand, heaped praise on Tsai, while roundly criticizing Ma for “inaccurate fallacies” in his claims that the DPP caucus had not been giving government officials a chance to explain the trade pact.
At a post-debate press conference held by the Presidential Office, Ma, his voice rough after the 150-minute televised program, declined to give a score for his performance, saying he would leave the verdict to the public.
Ma praised his opponent as “professional, sincere and open,” and said he looked forward to holding further discussions with Tsai on the issue.
Ma said he learned a lot from Tsai about the opposition’s concerns about an ECFA.
“Some may be hyperbole and some may be nonsense, but it maybe reflects the worries of the public, so we must not ignore it,” he said. “I will try to gather all the information I can and find out what else I can do to mitigate their concerns.”
Ma surprised many in the debate when, in his opening statement, he announced his administration would suspend negotiations “if the proposed accord would not benefit Taiwan’s overall economy.” However, he repeatedly dodged Tsai’s questions about alternative measures should the negotiations break down.
When the Taipei Times asked him the same question during the press conference, Ma said he would not reveal the contingency plan because the negotiations are still on-going.
Ma said he believed the public would understand and that they “definitely have other plans.” He did not elaborate.
Asked what he meant by “benefiting Taiwan’s overall economy,” Ma said it would include “reduction of tariffs [and] increasing exports,” and said as the economy improves, foreign investment would grow.
Ma also came under criticism from Tsai for repeatedly evading her questions about the discrepancy between his claim that tariffs could be saved once the trade deal is signed and the statistics made public by the government.
Ma told the press conference that he did not deliberately avoid the question, referring to it as a technical issue that he did not want to spend too much time explaining.
“I know the answer, but I’m not sure whether the public is interested in hearing it,” he said. “I will ask related agencies to deal with the details.”
Meanwhile, at a separate post-debate press conference held by the DPP, Tsai said she regretted what she called Ma’s failure to adequately explain many aspects of the controversial trade pact.
“His remarks lacked real content,” Tsai said.
“The president did not respond to any of the issues that I brought up, as I recollect; he did not deliver any substantive responses. It’s possible that he just didn’t hear me clearly or may have missed some of my questions,” she said, adding that Ma ended up just repeating most of the talking points that government agencies have already made public, still keeping the public unaware of the trade pact’s content.
“The questions that I asked were not even that difficult. Being the leader of this country, the [president] should have been well prepared to deal with the concerns over this important piece of national policy,” Tsai said.
However, she said, the DPP would welcome any chance for further debate on the issue.
Asked whether she would go ahead with a plan to hold a massive demonstration against an ECFA, Tsai said the DPP would watch to see if the Ma administration adjusts its attitude and drops the thinking that the agreement “must be signed no matter what” by June.
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY FLORA WANG
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
Taiwan’s Lee Chia-hao (李佳豪) on Sunday won a silver medal at the All England Open Badminton Championships in Birmingham, England, a career best. Lee, 25, took silver in the final of the men’s singles against world No. 1 Shi Yuqi (石宇奇) of China, who won 21-17, 21-19 in a tough match that lasted 51 minutes. After the match, the Taiwanese player, who ranks No. 22 in the world, said it felt unreal to be challenging an opponent of Shi’s caliber. “I had to be in peak form, and constantly switch my rhythm and tactics in order to score points effectively,” he said. Lee got
EMBRACING TAIWAN: US lawmakers have introduced an act aiming to replace the use of ‘Chinese Taipei’ with ‘Taiwan’ across all Washington’s federal agencies A group of US House of Representatives lawmakers has introduced legislation to replace the term “Chinese Taipei” with “Taiwan” across all federal agencies. US Representative Byron Donalds announced the introduction of the “America supports Taiwan act,” which would mandate federal agencies adopt “Taiwan” in place of “Chinese Taipei,” a news release on his page on the US House of Representatives’ Web site said. US representatives Mike Collins, Barry Moore and Tom Tiffany are cosponsors of the legislation, US political newspaper The Hill reported yesterday. “The legislation is a push to normalize the position of Taiwan as an autonomous country, although the official US
CHANGE OF TONE: G7 foreign ministers dropped past reassurances that there is no change in the position of the G7 members on Taiwan, including ‘one China’ policies G7 foreign ministers on Friday took a tough stance on China, stepping up their language on Taiwan and omitting some conciliatory references from past statements, including to “one China” policies. A statement by ministers meeting in Canada mirrored last month’s Japan-US statement in condemning “coercion” toward Taiwan. Compared with a G7 foreign ministers’ statement in November last year, the statement added members’ concerns over China’s nuclear buildup, although it omitted references to their concerns about Beijing’s human rights abuses in Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong. Also missing were references stressing the desire for “constructive and stable relations with China” and
RSS