Pope Benedict XVI looked in good form yesterday as he delivered his traditional Christmas message, urging tolerance for migrants, a day after falling during an assault at St Peter’s Basilica.
“In the face of the exodus of all those who migrate from their homelands and are driven away by hunger, intolerance or environmental degradation,” the Roman Catholic Church calls for “an attitude of acceptance and welcome,” the pope said.
The 82-year-old pontiff appeared upbeat and calm as he gave the urbi et orbi (to the city and the world) address to tens of thousands of pilgrims gathered in St Peter’s Square and millions around the world.
PHOTO: AFP
The spiritual leader of the world’s 1.1 billion Roman Catholics then gave blessings in 65 languages from Maltese to Mongolian.
In the assault on Thursday, a 25-year-old woman leapt over a security barrier and knocked the pope down in a dramatic start to his celebration of Christmas Eve mass.
Masses of pilgrims gasped as a security guard failed to stop her from grabbing Pope Benedict’s vestments near the neck and pulling him to the floor as several other people fell over in the melee.
Pope Benedict went on to celebrate mass undaunted by the assault, speaking out in his homily against selfishness as Christians across the world celebrated the birth of Jesus Christ.
Meanwhile, the Vatican identified the pontiff’s assailant as Susanna Maiolo, 25, and said she was hospitalized for “necessary treatment.”
A Vatican spokesman said she was “apparently unbalanced.” She had tried the same assault last year.
Prominent French Cardinal Roger Etchegaray, 87, broke a leg in the incident even though he was several meters away.
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday said that China has “no right to represent Taiwan,” but stressed that the nation was willing to work with Beijing on issues of mutual interest. “The Republic of China has already put down roots in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu,” Lai said in his first Double Ten National Day address outside the Presidential Office Building in Taipei. “And the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China [PRC] are not subordinate to each other.” “The People’s Republic of China has no right to represent Taiwan,” he said at the event marking the 113th National Day of
SPEECH IMPEDIMENT? The state department said that using routine celebrations or public remarks as a pretext for provocation would undermine peace and stability Beijing’s expected use of President William Lai’s (賴清德) Double Ten National Day speech today as a pretext for provocative measures would undermine peace and stability, the US Department of State said on Tuesday. Taiwanese officials have said that China is likely to launch military drills near Taiwan in response to Lai’s speech as a pretext to pressure the nation to accept its sovereignty claims. A state department spokesperson said it could not speculate on what China would or would not do. “However, it is worth emphasizing that using routine annual celebrations or public remarks as a pretext or excuse for provocative or coercive
CONCERNS: Allowing the government, political parties or the military to own up to 10 percent of a large media firm is a risk Taiwan cannot afford to take, a lawyer said A Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator has proposed amendments to allow the government, political parties and the military to indirectly invest in broadcast media, prompting concerns of potential political interference. Under Article 1 of the Satellite Broadcasting Act (衛星廣播電視法), the government and political parties — as well as foundations established with their endowments, and those commissioned by them — cannot directly or indirectly invest in satellite broadcasting businesses. A similar regulation is in the Cable Radio and Television Act (有線廣播電視法). “The purpose of banning the government, political parties and the military from investing in the media is to prevent them from interfering
RSS