The government yesterday decided to deny World Uyghur Congress president Rebiya Kadeer entry to Taiwan on the grounds that her visit would harm the national interest.
Minister of the Interior Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) said on the legislative floor yesterday afternoon that the government would not allow Kadeer to visit Taiwan if she applied for a visa.
Jiang said the World Uyghur Congress was related to a terrorist organization, while many countries had also been alerted to the congress’ general secretary.
“If Kadeer visits Taiwan, the purpose of her visit would have something to do with Xinjiang’s independence movement,” Jiang said.
“Like the precautionary measures we took during the nation’s previous two important [international] sports events [the World Games and the Deaflympics,] we are trying to prevent terrorism from overshadowing Taiwan. Therefore, we decided to give priority to our national interests,” he said.
Jiang said the National Immigration Agency cited Article 18 of the Immigration Act (入出國及移民法) as the reason for the rejection. It stipulates that the agency enjoys the authority to deny entry by foreign nationals who may harm Taiwan’s national interests or social order.
Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義), who was fielding questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, said the Cabinet supported the ministry’s decision.
Kadeer had been invited by two civic groups — Guts United Taiwan and the Taiwan Youth Anti-Communist Corps — to visit Taiwan in December.
The groups extended the invitation after China protested against the Kaohsiung Film Festival’s decision to screen The 10 Conditions of Love, which focuses on Kadeer.
After meeting Guts United, Taiwan president Freddy Lim (林昶佐) at her Washington office on Wednesday, Kadeer said: “I would love to visit Taiwan, but I have not even applied for the visa yet. I want to tell Taiwanese about our struggle and about the plight of the Uighur people. I hope they will let me visit so that I can tell this human rights story.”
The deputy secretary-general of the KMT caucus, Justin Chou (周守訓), yesterday said he respected the government’s decision.
“Kadeer is a politician and a sensitive figure in the world,” Chou said.
Throughout the question-and-answer session with legislators yesterday, Wu repeatedly said the government would give priority to the national interest when handling Kadeer’s planned visit.
Wu said the government needed to consider the impact of her visit on Taiwan’s international relations, image, cross-strait relations and the economy.
KMT headquarters yesterday also said it supported the government’s decision to reject any visa application by Kadeer and condemned the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for manipulating the issue for its own political interests.
KMT spokesman Lee Chien-jung (李建榮) said US President Barack Obama had recently decided not to meet the Dalai Lama during his trip to the US to protect the country’s national interests. Japan had also prevented visits by former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) for the same reason.
“The decision made by the government today is based on national and public interests,” he said.
Liao Wei-cheng (廖偉程), executive director of Guts United, Taiwan, however, criticized the government for making a decision before Kadeer had even filed a visa application.
“If the Chinese Nationalist Party government doesn’t even bother to wait to see Kadeer’s visa application or look at her reason for wanting to come to Taiwan before refusing her visit, I suspect that there’s a blacklist, and we seem to have returned to the White Terror era,” Liao told the Taipei Times in a telephone interview yesterday. “The government said they made the decision based on the interests of the country — of which country? Of China?”
He said that as a democracy with the rule of law, Taiwan should issue a visa to Kadeer if she follows the proper procedure.
“The refusal has damaged Taiwan’s image in the international community,” he said.
Liao said that if the Taiwanese government says Kadeer has connection to terrorists, “Are we accusing the US of harboring terrorists?”
“The Ministry of the Interior should explain to the public where it received the intelligence,” he said. “After all, we’re the only country other than China that refuses Kadeer entry.”
The DPP made a similar response through a press release yesterday.
“Kadeer has been granted refugee asylum by the US — a country that applies the most strict criteria on terrorists, and her organization, the World Uyghur Congress, has long been sponsored by the US’ National Endowment for Democracy,” the statement said.
“Apparently, the government’s criteria on terrorists are different from our long-time anti-terrorism partner,” it said.
So far, Kadeer has visited Germany, Australia, Japan and the Czech Republic, as well as speaking at a hearing of the European Parliament’s Subcommittee on Human Rights this year, the statement said.
DPP Legislator Huang Wei-che (黃偉哲) said the reasons cited by the government for the refusal were all excuses.
“I think the KMT government is just acting according to a blacklist that China has compiled,” he said.
REJECTION
Meanwhile, the World Uyghur Congress, which is headed by Kadeer, immediately opposed the linkage to terrorism.
“We strongly oppose the minister’s comment, made with no evidence at all,” said spokesman for the congress Dilxat Raxit. “We demand that he retracts his statement at once.”
Guts United Taiwan said in a statement last night that its determination to invite Kadeer to visit Taiwan “will not change and we will not give up applying for a visa for her.”
The Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) yesterday reported that organizers of the festival, the city government and the film’s producers had reached a consensus to screen the documentary again during the festival.
Chen, in response to the report, yesterday said the city government would respect the decision of the Kaohsiung Film Archive as to whether to screen the documentary during the Kaohsiung Film Festival next month.
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY MO YAN-CHIH AND AFP
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say
EMBRACING TAIWAN: US lawmakers have introduced an act aiming to replace the use of ‘Chinese Taipei’ with ‘Taiwan’ across all Washington’s federal agencies A group of US House of Representatives lawmakers has introduced legislation to replace the term “Chinese Taipei” with “Taiwan” across all federal agencies. US Representative Byron Donalds announced the introduction of the “America supports Taiwan act,” which would mandate federal agencies adopt “Taiwan” in place of “Chinese Taipei,” a news release on his page on the US House of Representatives’ Web site said. US representatives Mike Collins, Barry Moore and Tom Tiffany are cosponsors of the legislation, US political newspaper The Hill reported yesterday. “The legislation is a push to normalize the position of Taiwan as an autonomous country, although the official US
CHANGE OF TONE: G7 foreign ministers dropped past reassurances that there is no change in the position of the G7 members on Taiwan, including ‘one China’ policies G7 foreign ministers on Friday took a tough stance on China, stepping up their language on Taiwan and omitting some conciliatory references from past statements, including to “one China” policies. A statement by ministers meeting in Canada mirrored last month’s Japan-US statement in condemning “coercion” toward Taiwan. Compared with a G7 foreign ministers’ statement in November last year, the statement added members’ concerns over China’s nuclear buildup, although it omitted references to their concerns about Beijing’s human rights abuses in Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong. Also missing were references stressing the desire for “constructive and stable relations with China” and