British Prime Minister Tony Blair denied yesterday that any deals had been done to secure the return of 15 detainees from Iran, but questions remained over exactly how they were freed.
Speculation centered on the release on Tuesday of an Iranian diplomat kidnapped two months ago in Baghdad, and the reported promise this week of consular access to five Iranian officials seized by US forces in Iraq in January.
But as the sailors and marines arrived back in Britain, some commentators said the unexpected announcement of their release by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Wednesday was the result of classic, quiet diplomacy.
PHOTO: EPA
British newspapers said for all the positioning, it was direct talks on Tuesday between Blair's chief foreign policy adviser Nigel Sheinwald and top Iranian security official Ali Larijani that broke the deadlock.
"The best lesson to take away from this affair was how rapidly it was resolved once empowered officials on both sides talked directly," the Financial Times said.
NO DEALS
Blair, speaking at the exact moment the detainees touched down at London's Heathrow airport, was adamant their release had been secured "without any deal, without any negotiation, without any side agreement of any nature whatever."
"There are no agreements about any Iranian elements that may be held in Iraq because they are being held in Iraq as a result of the wrongful interference in the business of Iraq," he said.
Blair can justifiably claim a victory. His primary objective, the safe return of the Royal Navy personnel, has been achieved. He has not been forced into publicly apologizing, and Britain's version of events has not been convincingly proven false by Iran.
Throughout the crisis, Blair reiterated that Iran had nothing to gain from keeping the sailors detained. But Ahmedinejad scored a propaganda coup by his announcement on Wednesday that the sailors would be freed as a "gift," though Blair insisted nobody would be "taken in" by such "theater."
TV footage showed the smiling sailors, clad in new suits, thanking the president for their release and Iran's hospitality.
The 15 sailors and marines finally had a chance to escape the media spotlight on their flight home yesterday on board the British Airways flight from Tehran.
FLIGHT HOME
They were sectioned off in business class for the six-hour journey. Passengers booked at the front of the plane were relegated to economy. The only glimpse was the back of their heads when the curtains were briefly opened to allow cabin crew to pass through.
In a bid to shelter the captives from eager cameras, the crew took to crawling under a partition.
For Iranians travelling to London, including those deprived of their business class seats, the mood was one of relief that the crisis had not escalated further.
"I am very happy that they are going back. Nobody wants to be away from their family and friends. I always worry about some kind of misunderstanding between regimes," said Hooman Ghavimi, a 65-year-old on a business trip to London.
TEHRAN REACTS
Meanwhile, Iranian papers wrote with glee yesterday about the release of the Britons.
The conservative Resalat called the whole affair "a slap in the face" for "those countries that think they can violate Iran's territory."
The pro-reform Etemad-e Melli welcomed the sailors' release but said Ahmadinejad's announcement was "immature."
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday said that China has “no right to represent Taiwan,” but stressed that the nation was willing to work with Beijing on issues of mutual interest. “The Republic of China has already put down roots in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu,” Lai said in his first Double Ten National Day address outside the Presidential Office Building in Taipei. “And the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China [PRC] are not subordinate to each other.” “The People’s Republic of China has no right to represent Taiwan,” he said at the event marking the 113th National Day of
REACTION TO LAI: A former US official said William Lai took a step toward stability with his National Day speech and the question was how Beijing would respond US Secretary of State Antony Blinken yesterday warned China against taking any “provocative” action on Taiwan after Beijing’s reaction to President William Lai’s (賴清德) speech on Double Ten National Day on Thursday. Blinken, speaking in Laos after an ASEAN East Asia Summit, called the speech by Lai, in which he vowed to “resist annexation,” a “regular exercise.” “China should not use it in any fashion as a pretext for provocative actions,” Blinken told reporters. “On the contrary, we want to reinforce — and many other countries want to reinforce — the imperative of preserving the status quo, and neither party taking any
SPEECH IMPEDIMENT? The state department said that using routine celebrations or public remarks as a pretext for provocation would undermine peace and stability Beijing’s expected use of President William Lai’s (賴清德) Double Ten National Day speech today as a pretext for provocative measures would undermine peace and stability, the US Department of State said on Tuesday. Taiwanese officials have said that China is likely to launch military drills near Taiwan in response to Lai’s speech as a pretext to pressure the nation to accept its sovereignty claims. A state department spokesperson said it could not speculate on what China would or would not do. “However, it is worth emphasizing that using routine annual celebrations or public remarks as a pretext or excuse for provocative or coercive