Tue, Jul 05, 2005 page1

• Key Bush aide becomes a focus of US leak probe

  INSIDE SOURCE A US magazine reported that top aide Karl Rove was a source for journalists who were covering the leak of a CIA operative's identity

  • THE GUARDIAN
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  US President George W. Bush's right-hand man, Karl Rove, on Sunday found himself at the center of the controversy over who revealed the name of a secret CIA agent, after Newsweek revealed that he was a source for a story that appeared in Time magazine and for which two reporters are facing prison.

  In a development that could prove extremely damaging to the Bush administration, two lawyers close to the case say that e-mails between the Time reporter who wrote the story and his editors indicate that the reporter spoke to Rove.

  Rove's lawyer, Robert Luskin, confirmed that his client had been interviewed by Matthew Cooper for the article, but denied that Rove provided the crucial information that exposed the identity of the agent.

  Luskin told Newsweek that Rove "never knowingly disclosed classified information."

  But the two lawyers who spoke to Newsweek said there was growing concern that prosecutors now have their sights set on Rove, the architect of Bush's rise.

  The controversy relates to the leaking of the identity of a CIA agent, Valerie Plame, whose husband, the former ambassador Joseph Wilson, went on a CIA-sponsored trip to investigate whether Iraq was seeking to buy uranium from Niger for nuclear weapons.

  Some time after his return Wilson publicly accused the Bush administration of exaggerating the case for going to war.

  Annoyed by Wilson's public statements, two unnamed officials reportedly told the syndicated rightwing columnist Robert Novak that Plame was a CIA "operative" and had helped arrange his trip to Niger.

  Novak published the claims, sparking accusations that an undercover agent's identity had been disclosed, placing both her and her sources in physical danger, for partisan political purposes.

  At the time, Wilson said he believed that Rove was the source, but the accusation was dismissed by the White House as "totally ridiculous."

  It is a crime to knowingly divulge the identity of an undercover CIA operative and the leak prompted such a row that the justice department appointed a special counsel, Patrick Fitzgerald, to investigate. It is believed that Novak has reached a deal with the special prosecutor, which is why he is not being pursued by authorities.

  Two other reporters, Cooper from Time magazine and Judith Miller from the New York Times, who followed up the story have been threatened with jail for contempt of court unless they reveal their sources.

  Time Inc has been also charged with contempt and threatened with huge fines because it was in possession of Cooper's notes that could be relevant to the case.

  Last week the magazine submitted to judicial pressure, against Cooper's wishes, and handed over the relevant documents to the judge.

  Among them were the e-mails which showed that Rove was one of the sources for the story.

  Luskin insists Rove "did not tell any reporter that Valerie Plame worked for the CIA," but according to Newsweek refused to discuss details.

  In early October 2003, after Novak's column appeared in July, Rove called Chris Matthews, the host of the popular political talk show Hardball, and told him that Wilson's wife was "fair game."

  But Luskin yesterday emphatically denied that Rove had done anything untoward.

  "What I can tell you is that Cooper called Rove during that week between the Wilson article and the Novak article," Luskin told the Los Angeles Times.

  "But Karl absolutely did not identify Valerie Plame ... He did not disclose any confidential information about anybody to Cooper or to anybody else," he said.

  Until recently the main public focus for the case has been on press freedom, with the two reporters facing jail tomorrow for up to four months if they refuse to reveal their sources.

  At the end of last week Cooper and Miller submitted papers requesting house arrest or particular prisons if they had to be jailed, after the supreme court refused to hear their appeal.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Palmeiras hopes for club cup win

  • 2

    US to deliver 10 new F-16s, source says

  • 3

    Taiwan blacklists Huawei and SMIC

  • 4

    Ma Ying-jeou’s forum speech regrettable, MAC says

  • 5

    Barring of Chinese officials justified, MAC says