A blue-ribbon US government panel has recommended that Washington reconsider its "one China" policy and other fundamental US policies toward Taiwan.
The recommendation is the most dramatic of a series of suggestions made by the high-powered US-China Economic and Security Commission, a group set up by Congress in 2000 to assess US policies on US-China relations.
"Recent developments across the Strait are putting increasing stress on the United States' `one China' policy, demonstrating the need for a new assessment of [that] policy that takes into consideration current realities," said the report, released yesterday morning in Washington.
"Congress and the administration should conduct a fresh assessment of the `one China' policy, given the changing realities in China and Taiwan, including the policy's successes, failures and continued viability," the report said.
It also called for a reassessment of "whether changes may be needed in the way the United States government coordinates its defense assistance to Taiwan; and how US policy can better support Taiwan's breaking out of the international economic isolation that the PRC seeks to impose on it."
The recommendations, if accepted by the Bush administration and the administration that wins the November presidential election, could represent the most dramatic change in US cross-strait policy since the administration of Jimmy Carter recognized Beijing diplomatically in 1978.
The recommendation fits with a low-key, but ardent, effort by conservative thinkers in Washington to change the "one China" policy, an effort that many conservatives feel goes as high as House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, who has hinted at his preference for a change in recent years.
The commission was created as part of a defense spending bill four years ago. Its earlier findings and recommendations have been given weight in Washington because of the expertise of its members and the bipartisan nature of its suggestions.
On cross-strait relations, the commission said recent actions by China warrant a re-examination of policy.
"China's recent actions toward Taiwan and Hong Kong call into question its commitments to a peaceful approach toward Taiwan and to preserving Hong Kong's autonomy and self-government. These developments merit a fresh look at US policies in these areas by the Congress and the executive branch," the report says.
At the same time, the commission urges measures to bring about a resumption of cross-strait dialogue to avoid armed conflict between China and Taiwan.
"Congress should consult with the administration on developing appropriate ways for the United States to facilitate actively cross-strait dialogue that could promote the long-term, peaceful resolution of differences between the two sides and could lead to direct trade and transport links and/or other cross-strait confidence-building measures," the report says.
It urges the administration to report to Congress on the status of such talks, the obstacles to them and US efforts to promote dialogue.
Echoing a recent report by the Pentagon on China's military situation, the commission pointed out Beijing's increasing military threat to Taiwan.
"China's quantitative and qualitative military advancements have resulted in a dramatic shift in the cross-strait military balance toward China, with serious implications for Taiwan, for the United States, and for cross-strait relations," the commission report says.
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday said that China has “no right to represent Taiwan,” but stressed that the nation was willing to work with Beijing on issues of mutual interest. “The Republic of China has already put down roots in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu,” Lai said in his first Double Ten National Day address outside the Presidential Office Building in Taipei. “And the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China [PRC] are not subordinate to each other.” “The People’s Republic of China has no right to represent Taiwan,” he said at the event marking the 113th National Day of
SPEECH IMPEDIMENT? The state department said that using routine celebrations or public remarks as a pretext for provocation would undermine peace and stability Beijing’s expected use of President William Lai’s (賴清德) Double Ten National Day speech today as a pretext for provocative measures would undermine peace and stability, the US Department of State said on Tuesday. Taiwanese officials have said that China is likely to launch military drills near Taiwan in response to Lai’s speech as a pretext to pressure the nation to accept its sovereignty claims. A state department spokesperson said it could not speculate on what China would or would not do. “However, it is worth emphasizing that using routine annual celebrations or public remarks as a pretext or excuse for provocative or coercive
CONCERNS: Allowing the government, political parties or the military to own up to 10 percent of a large media firm is a risk Taiwan cannot afford to take, a lawyer said A Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator has proposed amendments to allow the government, political parties and the military to indirectly invest in broadcast media, prompting concerns of potential political interference. Under Article 1 of the Satellite Broadcasting Act (衛星廣播電視法), the government and political parties — as well as foundations established with their endowments, and those commissioned by them — cannot directly or indirectly invest in satellite broadcasting businesses. A similar regulation is in the Cable Radio and Television Act (有線廣播電視法). “The purpose of banning the government, political parties and the military from investing in the media is to prevent them from interfering