Participants in a televised debate yesterday on the cross-strait stability framework spent little time dealing with the referendum question itself and focussed on whether the referendum should be held at all.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Chiu Tai-san (
The referendum asks: "Do you agree our government should engage in negotiations with China about the establishment of a peaceful and stable framework for cross-strait interactions in order to build consensus and for the welfare of the peoples on both sides?"
Broadcast on China Television Co (
The three panelists were: Chao Chien-min (
Although the panelists tried to guide the two debaters back to the referendum question, Chiu and Ting traded blows over whether to support the referendum during most of the debate.
On behalf of the "yes" side, Chiu said the March 20 vote is "absolutely legal and constitutional."
"Many people claimed that the referendum is illegal, yet they didn't seek an interpretation from the Council of Grand Justices (大法官會議)," Chiu said. "They simply consider themselves grand justices."
Chiu also said many opponents confused the referendum with the emergency decree.
Chiu read the contents of Article 17 of the Referendum Law (
"If China steadily increasing its military budgets and weaponry and deploying 496 guided missiles targeted at Taiwan cannot be counted as a threat, then what is a threat to Taiwan?" Chiu said.
Chiu stressed that the result of the referendum will send the message to China that the people of Taiwan are against missile threats and desire peace.
"It will also help Taiwan's representatives when negotiating with China," Chiu said.
Chiu urged people not to give up their rights and to be the nation's masters.
Ting, a former president of Gallup Taiwan, representing the "no" side, said he opposed the referendum being held on the same day as the presidential election because it is "obviously a political tool manipulated by Chen to boost his re-election campaign."
Ting said he supports referendums but is opposed to the upcoming one. Ting wondered why the DPP did not hold a referendum on the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant or on reducing the number of legislators, saying this showed the DPP's intention to cheat people out of their votes.
As for the question itself, Ting said he objected resuming negotiations with Beijing because "the Chinese Communist Party [CCP] is too fearful and artful."
Ting said, as a Mainlander in Taiwan, he has witnessed how terrifying the Communist Party was because his grandfathers were killed by the party.
"Taiwan had better not provoke the CCP giant," he said.
Ting argued that Taiwan should interact with China more in terms of economics and culture, and should avoid discussing political issues.
"It is favorable for Taiwan to postpone the negotiation with the CCP," Ting said. "The later we negotiate with the CCP, the better."
"As long as Taiwan does not declare its independence and keeps its name as the Republic of China, the CCP cannot find any excuse to assault Taiwan," Ting said.
CARROT AND STICK: While unrelenting in its military threats, China attracted nearly 40,000 Taiwanese to over 400 business events last year Nearly 40,000 Taiwanese last year joined industry events in China, such as conferences and trade fairs, supported by the Chinese government, a study showed yesterday, as Beijing ramps up a charm offensive toward Taipei alongside military pressure. China has long taken a carrot-and-stick approach to Taiwan, threatening it with the prospect of military action while reaching out to those it believes are amenable to Beijing’s point of view. Taiwanese security officials are wary of what they see as Beijing’s influence campaigns to sway public opinion after Taipei and Beijing gradually resumed travel links halted by the COVID-19 pandemic, but the scale of
TRADE: A mandatory declaration of origin for manufactured goods bound for the US is to take effect on May 7 to block China from exploiting Taiwan’s trade channels All products manufactured in Taiwan and exported to the US must include a signed declaration of origin starting on May 7, the Bureau of Foreign Trade announced yesterday. US President Donald Trump on April 2 imposed a 32 percent tariff on imports from Taiwan, but one week later announced a 90-day pause on its implementation. However, a universal 10 percent tariff was immediately applied to most imports from around the world. On April 12, the Trump administration further exempted computers, smartphones and semiconductors from the new tariffs. In response, President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration has introduced a series of countermeasures to support affected
Pope Francis is be laid to rest on Saturday after lying in state for three days in St Peter’s Basilica, where the faithful are expected to flock to pay their respects to history’s first Latin American pontiff. The cardinals met yesterday in the Vatican’s synod hall to chart the next steps before a conclave begins to choose Francis’ successor, as condolences poured in from around the world. According to current norms, the conclave must begin between May 5 and 10. The cardinals set the funeral for Saturday at 10am in St Peter’s Square, to be celebrated by the dean of the College
CROSS-STRAIT: The vast majority of Taiwanese support maintaining the ‘status quo,’ while concern is rising about Beijing’s influence operations More than eight out of 10 Taiwanese reject Beijing’s “one country, two systems” framework for cross-strait relations, according to a survey released by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) on Thursday. The MAC’s latest quarterly survey found that 84.4 percent of respondents opposed Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formula for handling cross-strait relations — a figure consistent with past polling. Over the past three years, opposition to the framework has remained high, ranging from a low of 83.6 percent in April 2023 to a peak of 89.6 percent in April last year. In the most recent poll, 82.5 percent also rejected China’s
RSS