The Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday issued a press release to apologize for botching the Senegalese soccer team's visit last week, saying three high-ranking Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) officials had submitted themselves for punishment
"We must express our apology to the whole country now, because our mistakes -- which happened during the process of contacting and communicating with our guests -- have harmed the government's image and also failed to meet the public's expectations."
The press release said that the MOFA had made two major mistakes. The first was that it said its communication with the Senegalese team was flawed. The second was that it failed to promptly issue corrections when the media publicized incorrect information regarding the team's schedule.
Those who submitted themselves for punishment to Minister Eugene Chien (簡又新) are deputy director of the ministry's non-governmental organization affairs committee, Shih Jui-chi (石瑞琦), section chief of the committee Li Jui-cheng (李瑞徵) and Ministry Spokeswoman Katharine Chang (張小月).
Premier Yu Shyi-kun said yesterday that he had instructed the MOFA and the National Council of Physical Fitness and Sports to punish those officials who played a role in the mishandling of the event.
"Both the MOFA and the council already sent their reports to my office, and I told them they should learn a lesson [on the matter] and prevent the same mistakes from happening again," Yu told reporters yesterday. "I also ordered the two departments to publicize their lists of those officials who will be punished as soon as possible."
Yu said that since both MOFA and the council have expressed their sincerity in wanting to improve their ability to arrange such diplomatic visits, he was leaving it up to them to decide who should be punished and how.
Council officials said yesterday that a lack of communication between the two bodies was the main reason behind the problems surrounding the Senegalese visit.
Meanwhile, MOFA officials yesterday sought to reassure the public that the visit would not impact Taiwan-Senegal ties or President Chen Shui-bian's upcoming visit to the country.
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday said that China has “no right to represent Taiwan,” but stressed that the nation was willing to work with Beijing on issues of mutual interest. “The Republic of China has already put down roots in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu,” Lai said in his first Double Ten National Day address outside the Presidential Office Building in Taipei. “And the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China [PRC] are not subordinate to each other.” “The People’s Republic of China has no right to represent Taiwan,” he said at the event marking the 113th National Day of
SPEECH IMPEDIMENT? The state department said that using routine celebrations or public remarks as a pretext for provocation would undermine peace and stability Beijing’s expected use of President William Lai’s (賴清德) Double Ten National Day speech today as a pretext for provocative measures would undermine peace and stability, the US Department of State said on Tuesday. Taiwanese officials have said that China is likely to launch military drills near Taiwan in response to Lai’s speech as a pretext to pressure the nation to accept its sovereignty claims. A state department spokesperson said it could not speculate on what China would or would not do. “However, it is worth emphasizing that using routine annual celebrations or public remarks as a pretext or excuse for provocative or coercive
CONCERNS: Allowing the government, political parties or the military to own up to 10 percent of a large media firm is a risk Taiwan cannot afford to take, a lawyer said A Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator has proposed amendments to allow the government, political parties and the military to indirectly invest in broadcast media, prompting concerns of potential political interference. Under Article 1 of the Satellite Broadcasting Act (衛星廣播電視法), the government and political parties — as well as foundations established with their endowments, and those commissioned by them — cannot directly or indirectly invest in satellite broadcasting businesses. A similar regulation is in the Cable Radio and Television Act (有線廣播電視法). “The purpose of banning the government, political parties and the military from investing in the media is to prevent them from interfering
RSS