Premier Tang Fei (唐飛) yesterday proposed that Taiwan and China both drop their insistence about defining just what "one China" is and sit down to talk about building a "future one China."
"I suggest to the mainland that they do not insist `one China' refers to the People's Republic of China, and then we won't insist that the Republic of China is the `one China,'" Tang told the legislature.
Tang said a "future one China" should be acceptable to both sides.
PHOTO: GEORGE TSORNG, TAIPEI TIMES
However, Taiwan still insists that this "new China" should be one that is democratic and free, Tang said.
"If mainland China thinks this matter is negotiable, that will be a starting point," Tang said.
Tang made the remarks when facing the first general interpellation session from lawmakers.
In light of the new government's apparent attempt to break through the "one China" framework, under which cross-strait relations used to operate, lawmakers wanted clarification on whether the National Unification Council's (NUC) 1992 resolution on "the meaning of `one China'" still remained valid.
Under the resolution, Taiwan claimed that "one China" refers to the ROC and that its sovereignty covers "the whole of China," though its jurisdiction is only valid over Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu.
The document, meanwhile, states that it is a reality that China has been split and ruled by two "political entities" since 1949. It says any proposal for unification cannot ignore the existence of this reality.
Tang said the interpretation of "one China" set down by the NUC needs to be reviewed, because of the "legal dispute" that it involves.
Tang said the ROC's claim that its sovereignty covers the whole of China -- as is stipulated by the Constitution -- is disputable in international law, because the claim is inconsistent with the reality.
"The deadlock in cross-strait relations lies in the fact that China insists that Taiwan accepts its claim that `one China' refers to the PRC," Tang said.
He said Taiwan is in a disadvantageous position to confine itself within this "one China" framework, because the international community does not recognize the ROC as representing "one China."
"We need to break through this framework," Tang said.
Taiwan's future relationship with China -- whether it is unification, independence or maintaining the status quo -- will only be decided with the agreement of the majority of all 23 million people, Tang said.
Tang's explanation, however, failed to convince the lawmakers.
New Party Legislator Elmer Fung (馮滬祥) said it is the premier's obligation to comply with the Constitution.
"Until the Constitution is amended, the [ROC's] sovereignty will still cover the whole of China," Fung said.
Fung argued that since China has insisted that Taiwan stick to "the principle of `one China'" as the precondition to resuming cross-strait dialogue, Taiwan should continue to conform to the NUC's resolution.
Fung said the resolution has offered Taiwan a way to bypass the sovereignty dispute between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait while allowing both sides to have different claims on the content of "one China."
KMT Legislator Hong Yu-chin (洪玉欽) said the new government should seek a breakthrough in cross-strait relations based on the existing foundation built up by the KMT government.
"The KMT always believed the best solution was to allow both sides to have `freedom of expression' on their respective definitions of `one China,'" Hong said.
Hong argued that "one China" was never a problem until the government of President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) made it one.
NATIONAL SECURITY: The Chinese influencer shared multiple videos on social media in which she claimed Taiwan is a part of China and supported its annexation Freedom of speech does not allow comments by Chinese residents in Taiwan that compromise national security or social stability, the nation’s top officials said yesterday, after the National Immigration Agency (NIA) revoked the residency permit of a Chinese influencer who published videos advocating China annexing Taiwan by force. Taiwan welcomes all foreigners to settle here and make families so long as they “love the land and people of Taiwan,” Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) told lawmakers during a plenary session at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei. The public power of the government must be asserted when necessary and the Ministry of
Proposed amendments would forbid the use of all personal electronic devices during school hours in high schools and below, starting from the next school year in August, the Ministry of Education said on Monday. The Regulations on the Use of Mobile Devices at Educational Facilities up to High Schools (高級中等以下學校校園行動載具使用原則) state that mobile devices — defined as mobile phones, laptops, tablets, smartwatches or other wearables — should be turned off at school. The changes would stipulate that use of such devices during class is forbidden, and the devices should be handed to a teacher or the school for safekeeping. The amendments also say
CONSISTENT COMMITMENT: The American Institute in Taiwan director said that the US would expand investment and trade relationships to make both nations more prosperous The US would not abandon its commitment to Taiwan, and would make Taiwan safer, stronger and more prosperous, American Institute in Taiwan Director Raymond Greene said. “The US’ commitment to Taiwan has been consistent over many administrations and over many years, and we will not abandon our commitment to Taiwan, including our opposition to any attempt to use force or coercion to change Taiwan’s status,” he said in an exclusive interview with the Liberty Times (the sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Friday last week, which was published in the Chinese-language newspaper yesterday. The US would double down on its efforts
EMBRACING TAIWAN: US lawmakers have introduced an act aiming to replace the use of ‘Chinese Taipei’ with ‘Taiwan’ across all Washington’s federal agencies A group of US House of Representatives lawmakers has introduced legislation to replace the term “Chinese Taipei” with “Taiwan” across all federal agencies. US Representative Byron Donalds announced the introduction of the “America supports Taiwan act,” which would mandate federal agencies adopt “Taiwan” in place of “Chinese Taipei,” a news release on his page on the US House of Representatives’ Web site said. US representatives Mike Collins, Barry Moore and Tom Tiffany are cosponsors of the legislation, US political newspaper The Hill reported yesterday. “The legislation is a push to normalize the position of Taiwan as an autonomous country, although the official US