A pack of cigarettes, a carbon emissions permit and a carved stone twice the height of a human may seem to have little in common, but they do share one feature: They have all been used as currency. Anthropologists’ Money Bag, an exhibition currently on view at Academia Sinica’s Museum of the Institute of Ethnology, showcases these and other currencies from across cultures and historical periods.
Curated by Guo Pei-yi (郭佩宜), an associate research fellow, the exhibition aims to explore the varied forms and functions currency can take.
“Currency in practice is continually undergoing a dynamic negotiation process,” states a quote on one wall.
Photo: Shereen Lee, Taipei Times
The exhibition consists of five sections: monies of the world, how money acquires its value, money and the state, what happens when different currencies meet and monies of the new century.
The exhibition is located in a small, raised, brightly lit area set apart from the museum’s main rooms, creating a cozy atmosphere that contrasts sharply with the more serious long-term exhibitions. The numerous colorful interactive elements — doors set in the wall to open and shut or a container filled with cardboard cutouts of different objects used as currency around the world — ensure that the exhibition is accessible for people of all ages.
Anthropologists’ Money Bag’s playfulness does not detract from its academic value, however, and the provided “Exhibition Concepts” prompt visitors to ponder complex questions, such as: “What are the symbolic and political meanings of currency?” and “How do systems of currency impact our social life?”
The displays are effectively designed to expand visitors’ conceptions of what currency can be, do and mean, with an emphasis on breadth over depth.
CURRENCY AND RITUAL
Particularly thought-provoking are the explanations of currency’s use in ritual. One portion concerns bridewealth, a payment presented by the bride’s family to that of the groom, often in a special currency; another discusses the tradition of burning “spirit money” at funerals.
Ultimately, visitors come away from the exhibition understanding that money is a tool different cultures adapt to different ends to suit their needs — whether Solomon Islanders trading cowrie shells or American prison gangs exchanging instant noodles.
The Anthropologists’ Money Bag also seeks the public’s input on how they conceptualize money: A wall covered with Post-it notes responding to the statement, “Imagine there’s no money,” is as compelling as the more formal displays. Here, the exhibition’s pragmatic and objective view of currency gives way to more emotional perspectives.
“No currency is very scary, but no goods are even scarier,” reads one. “Classless society,” “Happy,” and “World peace!” all make an appearance. “Impossible” occurs twice, once in English, and once in Mandarin.
The Post-it notes demonstrate that a more extensive examination of systems of exchange that are not reliant on currencies, such as gift economies or barter systems, would have been a helpful addition, demonstrating that a world without money would not necessarily mean a world without property ownership or trade, nor would it be a utopia.
While the exhibition provides an interesting and informative dive into currency’s relationship with state legitimacy and autonomy, it lacks a significant consideration of the economic and labor systems (sometimes forced) facilitated or necessitated by various currency systems.
Nevertheless, the exhibition succeeds at creatively bringing a scholarly topic to life in an easily digestible manner. The wide range of cultures it manages to pack into such a limited amount of space is admirable, and the questions it raises are certainly worth contemplating. Jumping from 19th century western Africa to present-day Greece and back again, Anthropologists’ Money Bag criss-crosses the globe to offer a well-organized and insightful — if brief — look at an everyday and ubiquitous object.
The government released figures for October showing that, year on year, exports increased 49 percent to a record US$61.8 billion for the month. The dramatic increases were partly due to fall being the high season, but largely due to the AI boom driving demand for exports, which many investors fear is rapidly turning into a massive bubble. An editorial in this newspaper last month warned that the government should be ready in case the boom turns to bust. In previous boom-bust cycles, from shoes and textiles, through computer parts and accessories, to tools, bicycles and sporting goods, Taiwan has survived in
The Lee (李) family migrated to Taiwan in trickles many decades ago. Born in Myanmar, they are ethnically Chinese and their first language is Yunnanese, from China’s Yunnan Province. Today, they run a cozy little restaurant in Taipei’s student stomping ground, near National Taiwan University (NTU), serving up a daily pre-selected menu that pays homage to their blended Yunnan-Burmese heritage, where lemongrass and curry leaves sit beside century egg and pickled woodear mushrooms. Wu Yun (巫雲) is more akin to a family home that has set up tables and chairs and welcomed strangers to cozy up and share a meal
The second floor of an unassuming office building in central Bangkok is a strange place to encounter the world’s largest rodent. Yet here, inside a small enclosure with a shallow pool, three capybaras are at the disposal of dozens of paying customers, all clamoring for a selfie. As people eagerly thrust leafy snacks toward the nonchalant-looking animals, few seem to consider the underlying peculiarity: how did this South American rodent end up over 10,000 miles from home, in a bustling Asian metropolis? Capybara cafes have been cropping up across the continent in recent years, driven by the animal’s growing internet fame.
President William Lai (賴清德) has proposed a NT$1.25 trillion (US$40 billion) special eight-year budget that intends to bolster Taiwan’s national defense, with a “T-Dome” plan to create “an unassailable Taiwan, safeguarded by innovation and technology” as its centerpiece. This is an interesting test for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), and how they handle it will likely provide some answers as to where the party currently stands. Naturally, the Lai administration and his Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) are for it, as are the Americans. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is not. The interests and agendas of those three are clear, but
RSS