In the battle against the car, space-starved Singapore has deployed road tolls, massive spending on public transport and a license fee that bumps the cost of an average vehicle to over US$80,000.
But urban planners looking for solutions to gridlock may find the draconian measures hard to replicate in other less-compliant cities.
Singapore has gone further than any other major city to avoid the monster jams that have blighted Asian metropolises such as Jakarta or Manila.
Photo: AFP
The tough approach has been possible as Singaporeans are used to strict control — with media closely monitored and harsh punishments for minor crimes — and are fearful the city-state will be flooded with vehicles without the curbs.
However the model faces mounting criticism thanks to rush-hour jams that have frustrated commuters, surging vehicle prices after a freeze on car numbers and public transport breakdowns.
“I think the system can be made better and fairer,” Joel Lee, a 28-year-old technician, said.
He said authorities should make “a distinction between those who need cars, be it for work or family commitments, and those who just want more cars as a status symbol.”
PRICEY CERTIFICATE
Authorities’ main tool is the Certificate of Entitlement (COE). Every potential car buyer must bid for a certificate and the cost is added to the vehicle price.
The current cost of a COE for an average family car is almost US$37,000, pushing the price of a Toyota Corolla to US$83,000.
But COEs fluctuate depending on demand and at their high point four years ago the same car was US$127,000 — six times the price in the US.
The certificates are valid for 10 years, after which the car must be scrapped or the certificate renewed. Despite the high price, many in the financial center, home to hordes of wealthy expats and millionaires, have bought cars, with some 600,000 on the streets — a considerable number for a limited road network.
Other key measures include controlling the number of vehicles on the road and charging tolls on main roads at busy times.
Authorities last month decided to freeze the number of private cars on the road from February for at least two years, citing land scarcity.
But the decision sparked anger and was followed by a jump in the price of COEs by several thousand US dollars, in what the Straits Times newspaper described as “panic buying.”
To mitigate its tough policies, Singapore has built a modern public transport network with a subway, overland trains and buses — the government recently announced a plan to spend US$20.6 billion to upgrade the system.
Ride-hailing apps Grab and Uber have helped those unable or unwilling to spend on a car, and the government plans to build 700km of cycle paths.
But the subway has recently been hit by repeated delays and breakdowns during rush hour. In the most serious incident for years a tunnel on the network flooded last month, crippling a main line for 20 hours, and sparking widespread anger.
IS ‘CAR-LITE’ RIGHT?
Some are now questioning the government’s plan to make Singapore a country where most people walk, cycle or take public transport.
“The government has been trying to make the city ‘car-lite’ but you have a train system that’s not very reliable,” Jason Lin, a 66-year-old retiree, said.
“If you take a bus, because there are so many cars, it’ll take a long time. It can be very frustrating.”
Speaking in parliament this month, Lam Pin Min (藍彬明), a senior minister of state for transport, insisted that significant growth in the transport network was planned and there would be “less need to own a car.”
Singapore has not heavily promoted electric cars as it pushes public transport — unlike rival financial hub Hong Kong — but an electric-car sharing scheme starting next month is a first step to changing that.
Other places echo Singapore’s approach — London has a congestion charge while Paris sometimes orders some private cars off the road due to air pollution — but they are unlikely to copy the city-state’s tougher measures as it would be too risky.
“COE is not a very popular measure, and any government that tries to implement this kind of a measure in any other country may lose elections,” Vivek Vaidya, a transport expert at business consultancy Frost and Sullivan, said.
May 11 to May 18 The original Taichung Railway Station was long thought to have been completely razed. Opening on May 15, 1905, the one-story wooden structure soon outgrew its purpose and was replaced in 1917 by a grandiose, Western-style station. During construction on the third-generation station in 2017, workers discovered the service pit for the original station’s locomotive depot. A year later, a small wooden building on site was determined by historians to be the first stationmaster’s office, built around 1908. With these findings, the Taichung Railway Station Cultural Park now boasts that it has
Wooden houses wedged between concrete, crumbling brick facades with roofs gaping to the sky, and tiled art deco buildings down narrow alleyways: Taichung Central District’s (中區) aging architecture reveals both the allure and reality of the old downtown. From Indigenous settlement to capital under Qing Dynasty rule through to Japanese colonization, Taichung’s Central District holds a long and layered history. The bygone beauty of its streets once earned it the nickname “Little Kyoto.” Since the late eighties, however, the shifting of economic and government centers westward signaled a gradual decline in the area’s evolving fortunes. With the regeneration of the once
The latest Formosa poll released at the end of last month shows confidence in President William Lai (賴清德) plunged 8.1 percent, while satisfaction with the Lai administration fared worse with a drop of 8.5 percent. Those lacking confidence in Lai jumped by 6 percent and dissatisfaction in his administration spiked up 6.7 percent. Confidence in Lai is still strong at 48.6 percent, compared to 43 percent lacking confidence — but this is his worst result overall since he took office. For the first time, dissatisfaction with his administration surpassed satisfaction, 47.3 to 47.1 percent. Though statistically a tie, for most
In February of this year the Taipei Times reported on the visit of Lienchiang County Commissioner Wang Chung-ming (王忠銘) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and a delegation to a lantern festival in Fuzhou’s Mawei District in Fujian Province. “Today, Mawei and Matsu jointly marked the lantern festival,” Wang was quoted as saying, adding that both sides “being of one people,” is a cause for joy. Wang was passing around a common claim of officials of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the PRC’s allies and supporters in Taiwan — KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party — and elsewhere: Taiwan and
RSS