For more than a decade, the Beijing Queer Film Festival (北京酷兒影展) has been playing cat-and-mouse with the Chinese authorities. The event is a constant target of the government’s censors, who prohibit the depiction of lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender lives in films and TV shows. Screenings are often forced to cancel, and mainstream venues are out of the question. Yet, the film festival manages to survive, offering a rare platform for LGBT filmmakers and the communities who remain largely invisible in the state-controlled media.
Yang Yang (楊洋), a co-founder of the Chinese queer festival, was in Taipei last month to present Our Story: The Beijing Queer Film Festival’s 10 Years of Guerrilla Warfare (我們的故事:北京酷兒影展十年游擊戰) at the Women Make Waves Film Festival (女性影展). The 2011 documentary, directed by Yang, gives an insider’s look at the struggles of the organizers as well as their resourcefulness and resilience.
A draft law passed in September, however, might signal new obstacles ahead as it gives the authorities the legal right to shut down independent film festivals, following the widespread government crackdown on freedom of speech in recent years.
Photo courtesy of Women Make Waves Film Festival
“We will test the limits and see how far they will go [with the new law]. We make one move; they strike, and we will just retreat and find a different way. It has always been like this,” Yang says.
GOVERNMENT CENSORSHIP
The Beijing Queer Film Festival was established by a group of friends, including Yang and gay filmmaker Cui Zien (崔子恩), at Peking University in 2001, and has since become the oldest independent film festival in China. Being independent of the government’s censorship by the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television (國家廣播電影電視總局), the festival, like many other similar events across the country, often falls victim to government repression, which has significantly increased since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) took office in 2012. Screenings are canceled; venues are shut down, forcing participants to move to less conspicuous places like cafes and private homes, and rely on publicity by word of mouth.
Photo courtesy of Women Make Waves Film Festival
And though the censors recently allowed the commercial release of LGBT-themed Seek McCartney (尋找羅麥), a Chinese-French production, without demanding any cuts, Yang says that censorship remains strong, and certainly bears no direct relation to independent film showcases.
“Film festivals... are a civil assembly, and that is what the authorities are afraid of,” the 33-year-old filmmaker and curator says.
“The government doesn’t treat film festivals as a cultural activity. It regards them as a social and political matter… For now, it remains rather hopeless to hold independent film festivals [in China],” she adds.
Another law makes illegal any international film festival that contains activities deemed to damage “national interest and social stability.”
“The authorities used to interfere and find administrative flaws to shut us down. Now what we do is punishable by law,” Yang says.
ALTERNATIVES
For now, the small yet thriving community of LGBT filmmakers disseminate their work through less regulated venues, such as video streaming Web sites.
“The authorities control Web sites, but there are many loopholes. You can find a large number of films without screening permits available on the sites, including the works of Cui,” Yang says.
The LGBT films in China are mostly short or documentary works since the subject matter doesn’t lend itself to investors and commercial releases. Filmmakers either fund their own films with their own money or seek funding from foreign embassies and foundations. The Dutch embassy, for example, has been the main sponsor for the Beijing Queer Film Festival, and many of the festival’s screenings and forums take place at the embassy, beyond the purview of the Chinese authorities.
“The repression of sexual and gender minorities is common in a patriarchal society. In China, there is totalitarian rule, which is actually a variation of patriarchy. The LGBT movement is, by definition, anti-patriarchy, and I think this is a deeper reason behind the Chinese government’s crackdown on queer events,” Yang says.
The problem with Marx’s famous remark that history repeats itself, first as tragedy, the second time as farce, is that the first time is usually farce as well. This week Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chair Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made a pilgrimage to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) “to confer, converse and otherwise hob-nob” with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) officials. The visit was an instant international media hit, with major media reporting almost entirely shorn of context. “Taiwan’s main opposition leader landed in China Tuesday for a rare visit aimed at cross-strait ‘peace’”, crowed Agence-France Presse (AFP) from Shanghai. Rare!
What is the importance within the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) of the meeting between Xi Jinping (習近平), the leader Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), the leader of the KMT? Local media is an excellent guide to determine how important — or unimportant — a news event is to the public. Taiwan has a vast online media ecosystem, and if a news item is gaining traction among readers, editors shift resources in near real time to boost coverage to meet the demand and drive up traffic. Cheng’s China trip is among the top headlines, but by no means
Sunflower movement superstar Lin Fei-fan (林飛帆) once quipped that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) could nominate a watermelon to run for Tainan mayor and win. Conversely, the DPP could run a living saint for mayor in Taipei and still lose. In 2022, the DPP ran with the closest thing to a living saint they could find: former Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中). During the pandemic, his polling was astronomically high, with the approval of his performance reaching as high as 91 percent in one TVBS poll. He was such a phenomenon that people printed out pop-up cartoon
A recent report from the Environmental Management Administration of the Ministry of Environment highlights a perennial problem: illegal dumping of construction waste. In Taoyuan’s Yangmei District (楊梅) and Hsinchu’s Longtan District (龍潭) criminals leased 10,000 square meters of farmland, saying they were going to engage in horticulture. They then accepted between 40,000 and 50,000 cubic meters of construction waste from sites in northern Taiwan, charging less than the going rate for disposal, and dumped the waste concrete, tile, metal and glass onto the leased land. Taoyuan District prosecutors charged 33 individuals from seven companies with numerous violations of the law. This