An interesting news report last month from China caught my attention. According to Apple Daily, a Chinese man parked his luxury BMW, which was filled with yellow roses, in downtown Shanghai on Jan. 24. He then stepped out of his car, knelt on one knee and proposed to his boyfriend in front of a crowd. Surprised by the sudden and very public move, the boyfriend quickly said “yes.” They kissed happily.
The marriage proposal caused a sensation online after a series of photos were posted on Sina Weibo (新浪微博) pages, and most of the comments were quite positive. Some netizens joked that no wonder it is difficult for women to find good men, because many “tall, rich and handsome” (高富帥) guys are all gay, while others said that China should encourage same-sex marriage to resolve a serious gender imbalance.
Intriguingly, the marriage proposal took place in a country that is not so friendly to the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community. Although homosexuality may have existed throughout China’s five thousand years of history, LGBTs are still often treated like second-class citizens.
Photo: Reuters
SLOW CHANGES
The marriage proposal was not the first of its kind. In October 2012, Lu Zhong (陸忠) and Liu Wanqiang (劉萬強) held a same-sex wedding in China’s Fujian Province.
In January last year, Wang Sicong (王思聰), the son of China’s richest man Wang Jianlin (王健林), surprised the public by revealing that he is bisexual on his Sina Weibo page.
Photo: Reuters
Last month in Shenzhen, a gay man nicknamed A-yi (阿易) filed the first lawsuit against workplace discrimination after his company fired him because of his sexual orientation.
China has been slow to accept homosexuality. The Chinese government did not decriminalize gay sex until 1997, and homosexuality was classified as a “psychiatric disorder” before 2001. According to a report in Deutsche Welle last year, “Today, the Chinese government no longer harasses LGBT people on one premise: they cannot show homosexual behaviors at public occasions or make related political appeals.”
This reminds me of then US president Bill Clinton’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy in the military in the 1990s. The problem is, as Internet and smartphone technology continues to develop rapidly, an open policy seems inevitable.
BOOMING MARKET
Take the smartphone app Blued for example. Ever since China’s Blue City (藍色城市) launched the gay dating app in 2012, it has astonishingly attracted more than 15 million members — including 3 million members from outside China.
Popular gay dating apps Grindr of the US and Jack’d of Belgium also have users in China, but they can hardly compete with Blued in the huge Chinese market. Blued is already the world’s largest gay dating app, while its biggest competitor Grindr has about 10 million users.
Even Chinese officials are working with the app to battle the spread of HIV/AIDS, as they reach out to LGBT people by providing information on condom use and AIDS, as well as free HIV tests to the users.
According to a report in Bloomberg Businessweek last year, entitled “World’s largest gay dating app, born in China, now attracts global investors,” Silicon Valley-based DCM Ventures was investing US$30 million on Blued. “We believe that the gay community in China will probably be the largest in the world in the future,” the report quoted DCM co-founder David Chao (趙克仁). Blued’s users are “a great audience for middle to upper-end products and services that are starting to take off in China,” Chao added.
And he may be right. China is the world’s most populated country, so it could be the largest country in terms of LGBT population theoretically. Most studies show that LGBT people usually account for three and a half to five percent of the total population. In other words, among the approximately 1.39 billion Chinese people, up to 69 million people are homosexuals, a figure three times higher than the total population of Taiwan.
WHAT CAN TAIWAN DO?
Are these cases showing the wind of change in China? If so, what role should Taiwan play? Since the two sides are closely linked geographically and culturally, Taiwan’s potential impacts on China’s LGBT community deserve our attention.
In the face of China’s ongoing changes, Taiwan has often played an influential role. The country is relatively friendly to LGBT people and has a positive impact on Chinese LGBTs. Through frequent cross-strait exchanges in recent years, an increasing number of LGBTs from China are visiting Taiwan to experience the friendly atmosphere.
James Yang (楊震), Beijing LGBT Center’s (北京同志中心) director of development, was overwhelmed when he flew to Taiwan to attend the Taiwan LGBT Pride Parade (台灣同志遊行) in October last year.
Carrying a handmade placard from Beijing LGBT Center above his head, Yang could barely proceed along the parade route because so many people wanted to be photographed by his side, the New York Times reported last year.
“I’ve been to gay pride marches in New York, San Diego and Los Angeles, but this is so emotional for me,” Yang told the New York Times as he proudly marched with more than 65,000 LGBT people and their supporters through downtown Taipei. “It’s really exciting, but at the same time, the outpouring of support reminds me of how far behind we are in China,” he added.
As Bloomberg Businessweek concluded, attitudes toward homosexuality are changing quickly — although unevenly — across China.
Taiwan should certainly seize the business opportunities posed by the large Chinese market. For example, people in Taiwan’s high-tech industry are particularly skilled at designing fun and creative smartphone apps, so they can actively explore this booming area.
But more importantly, since gay rights are human rights, Taiwan should offer greater protection of gay rights and set a good example for China. We could inspire the Chinese people and even their government, serving as a positive influence for Beijing. Don’t be an absentee in the transformation of the world’s largest gay country.
Last week saw the appearance of another odious screed full of lies from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) Ambassador to Australia, Xiao Qian (肖千), in the Financial Review, a major Australian paper. Xiao’s piece was presented without challenge or caveat. His “Seven truths on why Taiwan always will be China’s” presented a “greatest hits” of the litany of PRC falsehoods. This includes: Taiwan’s indigenous peoples were descended from the people of China 30,000 years ago; a “Chinese” imperial government administrated Taiwan in the 14th century; Koxinga, also known as Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功), “recovered” Taiwan for China; the Qing owned
Jan. 20 to Jan. 26 Taipei was in a jubilant, patriotic mood on the morning of Jan. 25, 1954. Flags hung outside shops and residences, people chanted anti-communist slogans and rousing music blared from loudspeakers. The occasion was the arrival of about 14,000 Chinese prisoners from the Korean War, who had elected to head to Taiwan instead of being repatriated to China. The majority landed in Keelung over three days and were paraded through the capital to great fanfare. Air Force planes dropped colorful flyers, one of which read, “You’re back, you’re finally back. You finally overcame the evil communist bandits and
I am kneeling quite awkwardly on a cushion in a yoga studio in London’s Shoreditch on an unseasonably chilly Wednesday and wondering when exactly will be the optimum time to rearrange my legs. I have an ice-cold mango and passion fruit kombucha beside me and an agonising case of pins and needles. The solution to pins and needles, I learned a few years ago, is to directly confront the agony: pull your legs out from underneath you, bend your toes up as high as they can reach, and yes, it will hurt far more initially, but then the pain subsides.
When Angelica Oung received the notification that her Xiaohongshu account had been blocked for violating the social media app’s code of conduct, her mind started racing. The only picture she had posted on her account, apart from her profile headshot, was of herself wearing an inflatable polar bear suit, holding a sign saying: “I love nuclear.” What could be the problem with that, wondered Oung, a clean energy activist in Taiwan. Was it because, at a glance, her picture looked like someone holding a placard at a protest? Was it because her costume looked a bit like the white hazmat suits worn