Two opposing teams take the stage, ready to compete. A player from one team steps forward, seeking suggestions from the audience for a scene in which a death is involved.
“I hear mental hospital. I hear sex scene. Okay, I will take the mental hospital,” the player says, and proceeds, along with her team to create a 60-second show, which draws considerable laughter from the full-house audience. They won the round.
It was one of the several improvisational skits performed by actors from the Guts Improv Theater (勇氣即興劇場) last Friday at the company’s newly opened theater. This type of performance is called Theatersports, an invention of Keith Johnstone, a British pioneer of improvisational theater, which combines the format of a competition with theatrical performance.
Photo courtesy of Guts Improv Theater
There are several ground rules: no props and costume. Players need to make up stuff and create scenes spontaneously based on audience suggestions. There are also rules for each improvisational game. For example, one of the games played last Friday saw the players weaving together a story using disconnected lines suggested by the audience, including “come here, you,” “these problems are not real problems” and “under the banyan tree by the road.”
Like a sports game, audience engagement is also highly valued. Ways to participate include rating performances by clapping or yelling “die” to eliminate a stammering player from a game that involves members taking turn to compose a story by adding sentences.
“When I first encountered theatersports, I thought it was great fun and it challenged my theater experience. You see a group of actors on stage trying so hard to connect with those in the audience. It is spontaneous and amusing,” says Wu Hsiao-hsien (吳效賢), founder of Guts Improv Theater, which is a member of the International Theatersports Institute and holds a license to produce games of theatersports.
Setting up the company in 2004 shortly after returning to Taipei from her internship at BATS Improv, a center for improvisational theater based in San Francisco, Wu held workshops to teach improv skills before producing the troupe’s debut show in 2006. One reason is that improv theater is a little-known genre in Taiwan. Even trained actors need to learn the skills of improvisation.
“Given a prepared script, character and direction, an actor’s main responsibility is to act accordingly; on the other hand, as improvisers, our job is to act, direct and script at the same time. And we must create the characters, dialogue, action and the story collaboratively with other improvisers on stage,” Wu explains.
For Wu, improv is a form of theater that reflects life itself, unpredictable, ever-changing and without a script; its guiding principles can easily go beyond the circle of performing art and into everyday life.
“In Taiwan’s education, there is little emphasis on team work. We take tests and are taught that results are what matter. We don’t do well when it comes to helping each other out. At workshops, we use various improv games and training to emphasize processes during which failures are treated as new possibilities. It is about accepting, supporting and relying on each other. To me, it is a wonderful thing,” she says.
Apart from theatersports performance, the troupe also produces improvisational musicals as well as short-form and long-form works of improvisation. For those interested in learning improvisation, various types of workshops are on offer on a regular basis. More information can be obtained at the company‘s Web site at www.gutsimprov.com.
Common sense is not that common: a recent study from the University of Pennsylvania concludes the concept is “somewhat illusory.” Researchers collected statements from various sources that had been described as “common sense” and put them to test subjects. The mixed bag of results suggested there was “little evidence that more than a small fraction of beliefs is common to more than a small fraction of people.” It’s no surprise that there are few universally shared notions of what stands to reason. People took a horse worming drug to cure COVID! They think low-traffic neighborhoods are a communist plot and call
It is barely 10am and the queue outside Onigiri Bongo already stretches around the block. Some of the 30 or so early-bird diners sit on stools, sipping green tea and poring over laminated menus. Further back it is standing-room only. “It’s always like this,” says Yumiko Ukon, who has run this modest rice ball shop and restaurant in the Otsuka neighbourhood of Tokyo for almost half a century. “But we never run out of rice,” she adds, seated in her office near a wall clock in the shape of a rice ball with a bite taken out. Bongo, opened in 1960 by
Over the years, whole libraries of pro-People’s Republic of China (PRC) texts have been issued by commentators on “the Taiwan problem,” or the PRC’s desire to annex Taiwan. These documents have a number of features in common. They isolate Taiwan from other areas and issues of PRC expansion. They blame Taiwan’s rhetoric or behavior for PRC actions, particularly pro-Taiwan leadership and behavior. They present the brutal authoritarian state across the Taiwan Strait as conciliatory and rational. Even their historical frames are PRC propaganda. All of this, and more, colors the latest “analysis” and recommendations from the International Crisis Group, “The Widening
From a nadir following the 2020 national elections, two successive chairs of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) and Eric Chu (朱立倫), tried to reform and reinvigorate the old-fashioned Leninist-structured party to revive their fortunes electorally. As examined in “Donovan’s Deep Dives: How Eric Chu revived the KMT,” Chu in particular made some savvy moves that made the party viable electorally again, if not to their full powerhouse status prior to the 2014 Sunflower movement. However, while Chu has made some progress, there remain two truly enormous problems facing the KMT: the party is in financial ruin and
RSS