I am sorry to have to say it, but The Korean Popular Culture Reader is close to the most disappointing book I have ever had to review.
Not long ago I found myself engrossed in a Korean TV mini-series called Hot Blood. It concerned the unlikely subject of an ambitious car salesman, but the production standards, acting and plot, together, I have to admit, with the extremely photogenic character of many of the performers, made me an instant addict.
It was an example of the much-vaunted genre of K-drama, and such programs have become hugely popular worldwide. I’ve lost track of some of the other titles, both contemporary and historical, I’ve found myself watching, but other sensations have included Stars Falling from the Sky and IRIS 11: New Generation of 2013.
As for the related phenomenon of K-pop, my teenage years are long gone, but I’ve nonetheless watched a number of girl groups cavorting in TV studios and performing songs that some condemn as “bubblegum pop” but which have, even so, attained astronomical ratings on social-media Web sites.
So a book that claims to be a reader relating to these phenomena was surely going to be of interest. What about the cosmetic surgery that’s said to have produced all these flawless faces? What about the near slave conditions in which these teenage groups have allegedly been trained from a very early age? And what about the exceptional screen-writers responsible for these highly watchable Korean dramas? How about the relation of these distinctive art forms to fashion, to Korean politics, to exports of other Korean products, not to mention the fan-hysteria (unmatched, some say, since the days of the Beatles), and the companies such as S M Entertainment behind these pop groups? A book that threw light on such things would surely make compelling reading.
Sadly — indeed astonishingly — almost none of these subjects, not even the pop groups themselves, let alone the TV dramas, are treated in any real depth in The Korean Popular Culture Reader.
Instead its main text opens with a chapter on early 20th century fiction, followed by one on Korean comics in the 1970s, then one on computer games, then one on the Internet as the medium for K-dramas (but little on the dramas themselves). Next come two chapters on Korean film in the 1950s, followed by one on North Korean film, and a final one in this movie section on a 2003 product designed to confront various forms of discrimination.
I couldn’t believe my eyes when, already at page 195, I found that next came a section on – sport!
Already exhausted, I turned to a Web site called “goodreads,” to find two young ladies who had been “awarded” copies of the book and had given it five stars without, in either case, having read it. One was “looking forward to reading it,” while another said she hadn’t read it yet, but loved K-pop and drama. I thought both had a major disappointment coming.
I pressed on nonetheless. After the sports section came, on page 249, a section on music. I was wrong to be relieved, however. Its first chapter was on the 1930s, the decade of our present girl groups’ great grandparents, then came a moderately interesting one on Korean rock groups in the 1960s and 1970s and their problems with the authorities, then an essay on the music of the 1990s.
Finally, on page 314, I arrived at a chapter on the phenomenon of the present-day girl groups. This was an oasis in the veritable desert surrounding it. It considered videos by Girls’ Generation, KARA, After School, Miss-A, 4Minute, 2NE1 and f(x). It questioned somewhat predictably whether they really represented an “escape from patriarchy,” but ended up by interestingly noting that Girls’ Generation were said to be made to live on only 1,200 calories a day, and that currently half of Korean high-school girls were unable to donate blood because of anemia and malnutrition caused by dieting.
There was, I admit, the routine reference to “late capitalism,” but nevertheless, with its quoted claim that 60 percent of girl group members admitted to pressure from their managers to wear revealing clothing and/or perform dance moves with which they were uncomfortable, this was an insightful and relevant chapter. Would that more of the book had been like that.
With 50 pages still to go, I still had hopes of more on what the book’s title had promised. But I discovered — to my horror — that all they contained were chapters on tourism, Korean cuisine, and an academic’s trip to North Korea.
The fundamental problem with this product is that its publishers desperately want to appeal to the huge global following that K-pop and K-drama have won (rightly or wrongly), but that most of the commissioned academics know next to nothing about it, and fall back on writing about their research topics, which are inevitably largely historical.
But that’s not all. In the book’s promotional material, Psy’s record-breaking Gangnam Style video, with some two billion hits on YouTube not counting parodies, is described as “silly.” Can something that’s received MTV Europe’s Music Award for Best Video, and has been watched by approaching a quarter of the world’s population, be labeled “silly” without a patronizing tone creeping in? I don’t think so. To patronize, and at the same time seek to please those you’re patronizing, is, it seems to me, an especially lethal combination.
The moral is, never trust literary academics, at least of the current generation, and when they’re attempting to elucidate popular culture, don’t trust them under any circumstances. They have no idea what it is, have little to say about it and, in this particular case, mostly don’t even try.
April 14 to April 20 In March 1947, Sising Katadrepan urged the government to drop the “high mountain people” (高山族) designation for Indigenous Taiwanese and refer to them as “Taiwan people” (台灣族). He considered the term derogatory, arguing that it made them sound like animals. The Taiwan Provincial Government agreed to stop using the term, stating that Indigenous Taiwanese suffered all sorts of discrimination and oppression under the Japanese and were forced to live in the mountains as outsiders to society. Now, under the new regime, they would be seen as equals, thus they should be henceforth
Last week, the the National Immigration Agency (NIA) told the legislature that more than 10,000 naturalized Taiwanese citizens from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) risked having their citizenship revoked if they failed to provide proof that they had renounced their Chinese household registration within the next three months. Renunciation is required under the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), as amended in 2004, though it was only a legal requirement after 2000. Prior to that, it had been only an administrative requirement since the Nationality Act (國籍法) was established in
Three big changes have transformed the landscape of Taiwan’s local patronage factions: Increasing Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) involvement, rising new factions and the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) significantly weakened control. GREEN FACTIONS It is said that “south of the Zhuoshui River (濁水溪), there is no blue-green divide,” meaning that from Yunlin County south there is no difference between KMT and DPP politicians. This is not always true, but there is more than a grain of truth to it. Traditionally, DPP factions are viewed as national entities, with their primary function to secure plum positions in the party and government. This is not unusual
US President Donald Trump’s bid to take back control of the Panama Canal has put his counterpart Jose Raul Mulino in a difficult position and revived fears in the Central American country that US military bases will return. After Trump vowed to reclaim the interoceanic waterway from Chinese influence, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth signed an agreement with the Mulino administration last week for the US to deploy troops in areas adjacent to the canal. For more than two decades, after handing over control of the strategically vital waterway to Panama in 1999 and dismantling the bases that protected it, Washington has
RSS