A little over a year ago, physicists put the finishing touches to the most successful scientific theory of all time: the Standard Model of particle physics. When the Higgs boson was found at the Large Hadron Collider in July 2012, it was the final piece in our picture of the universe at the smallest, subatomic scales.
Champagne corks flew in physics labs around the world at this vindication of quantum field theory, which had been more than 80 years and dozens of Nobel prizes in the making.
Inevitably, a hangover followed. The leading idea for how to push physics beyond the Standard Model — and explain the many remaining mysteries of the universe — is looking shaky. Thousands of physicists have spent their career carefully constructing the theory, called supersymmetry. It has taken almost four decades. But, so far, the most powerful particle accelerator ever built — the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at Cern, near Geneva — has not found any hard evidence to back up the theory.
PHOTO: AFP
This conspicuous lack of proof has led a growing number of physicists, particularly those who are less invested in supersymmetry, to publicly call time on the idea. Perhaps, despite all the work, the theory is just plain wrong.
Beyond the standard model
The Standard Model describes all the fundamental particles that make up the matter and forces in the universe — including electrons, quarks and photons — but it has some worrying omissions. It fails, for example, to include a description of the familiar force of gravity, which not only keeps us rooted to the ground but also shapes the universe at the scale of stars and galaxies. Neither is it able to explain the presence of so much matter, as opposed to anti-matter, in the universe.
PHOTO: AFP
Worse, the particles and forces in the Standard Model can account for only around 4 percent of the mass of the universe. The remaining 96 percent is dark matter and dark energy, and scientists have no idea what either of these things might be. The Standard Model has been a great success, but it can take us only so far in understanding the fabric of reality.
Enter supersymmetry. First formulated in the early 1970s, and with more than 10,000 scientific papers written about it, the theory has fought off rival ideas to emerge as the leading candidate to explain physics beyond the Standard Model.
Its central proposition is that every particle in the Standard Model has a heavier, as-yet-unseen “superpartner.” The superpartners of quarks and electrons, for example, are called squarks and selectrons; the superpartners of the Higgs, and of force carriers such as the photon, are the higgsino and photino.
“This theory is founded on such a lovely idea: that you have this additional symmetry in nature that unites force and matter and gives a deep, intimate connection between them, that tells them they’re not distinct entities by themselves, that the universe is really rather simpler than you might have thought,” says Professor Tara Shears, a particle physicist at Liverpool University.
Supersymmetry is attractive for many reasons, not least because its lightest predicted supersymmetric particle, the neutralino, could be a candidate for the universe’s dark matter.
The theory also solves a fundamental problem with the Higgs boson. The natural mass of the boson should be subject to huge fluctuations as it interacts with other fundamental particles. Left unchecked, this could mean that its mass could grow bigger than any value we have observed. To get around this, supersymmetry proposes that the superpartners of every fundamental particle also interact with the Higgs, but in such a way that each one almost exactly cancels out the fluctuations of their normal partners.
“It’s such an attractive idea,” says Shears. “But,” she warns, “if that idea is going to be reality, you need to have experimental proof.”
Evidence
One way to prove that supersymmetry is a true picture of nature is to find some of its predicted superpartner particles at the LHC. But, as yet, there has been nothing. All the results from experiments match up neatly with the Standard Model.
To find new particles, scientists at the LHC accelerate protons to near the speed of light and smash them together. As the wreckage fires out in all directions, it produces an array of particles. The higher the energy of the collision, the more massive the particles that can be formed. So far, the collider has been smashing together particles at a peak energy of around half its maximum output, and has uncovered the Higgs boson, which has a mass of around 125 gigaelectronvolts (GeV).
The masses of the predicted supersymmetric particles are not fixed in the theoretical models. But scientists know that the superpartner of the top quark, for example, should not be much bigger than the Higgs boson.
“Even the best supersymmetry fans would say that if — when — we go to higher energies, we see no sign of anything, and we manage to exclude the superpartner of the top quark up to a few TeV [teraelectronvolts], it’s significantly less interesting,” says Professor Jon Butterworth, who works on the Atlas detector at the LHC and is head of the physics and astronomy department at University College London.
“In my view ... it’s already less credible than it was before the LHC turned on. If we don’t find the top superpartner in the next run, then I think it’s dead, to be honest.”
The LHC is currently switched off, part way through a technical upgrade that will allow proton collisions near the machine’s maximum-rated energy, of 14TeV, by the start of 2015. If supersymmetry is real, then scientists might expect the particles it predicts to show up in the detectors as jets of hadrons (composite particles made of quarks) coming out of the collision that are not balanced, in terms of momentum, by the jets going off in the opposite direction. The missing momentum could be a sign that a neutralino has been created but, because it interacts so weakly with normal matter, it can be detected only indirectly.
“Supersymmetry is a bit late to the party, but I don’t think it’s lost yet,” says Professor Ben Allanach, a particle theorist at the University of Cambridge who works on supersymmetry. “That’s not necessarily a view held by many of my colleagues. Many of the experimentalists — and some theorists — have got disheartened with it and are giving up already. It begs the question: when would I give up if there’s no new evidence?”
Keeping the faith
Allanach says he will wait until the LHC has spent a year or so collecting data from its high-energy runs from 2015. And if no particles turn up during that time? “Then what you can say is there’s unlikely to be a discovery of supersymmetry at Cern in the foreseeable future,” he says.
John Ellis, a particle theorist at Cern and King’s College London, has been working on supersymmetry for more than 30 years, and is optimistic that the collider will find the evidence he has been waiting for. But when would he give up? “After you’ve run the LHC for another 10 years or more and explored lots of parameter space and you still haven’t found supersymmetry at that stage, I’ll probably be retired. It’s often said that it’s not theories that die, it’s theorists that die.”
Ellis counsels his colleagues, some of whom he admits are getting spooked by the lack of evidence for supersymmetry, to have patience. “There can be a big gap between a proposal of a theoretical idea and the experimental confirmation. Let’s not forget that the Higgs boson was proposed in 1964 and it took 48 years for it to be discovered,” he says. “Realistic supersymmetric theories probably date back to 1973, so we’ve only been looking for supersymmetry for 40 years. So keep the faith.”
Theorists are well aware that anything they come up with on paper, scientifically speaking, is subject to confirmation by experiment. “Theorists never take anything for granted — your theory is just as good as anybody else’s, until it’s been proven wrong,” says Shears.
But if the LHC doesn’t find any compelling proof for supersymmetry in the next few years, physicists will be left with some uncomfortable possibilities. It could be that the accelerator is just not powerful enough to produce the new particles, and a future accelerator will discover them. Or it could be that we do not live in a supersymmetric universe.
“Then,” says Shears,” we have the third alternative, which is going to be the most frustrating of all, which is that we could live in a supersymmetric universe and just never know.”
In that case, what fills the theory gap? “If nothing else shows up — we’ve got a Higgs and nothing else — then it’s not at all obvious what the next experiment ought to be,” says Butterworth. In other words, if supersymmetry doesn’t work out, theorists do not have a ready alternative to take its place.
Alternative theory
If the worst happens, and supersymmetry does not show itself at the LHC, Allanach says it will be a wrench to have to go and work on something else. “I’ll feel a sense of loss over the excitement of the discovery. I still feel that excitement and I can imagine it, six months into the running at 14TeV and then some bumps appearing in the data and getting very excited and getting stuck in. It’s the loss of that that would affect me, emotionally.”
Ellis, though confident that he will be vindicated, is philosophical about the potential failure of a theory that he, and thousands of other physicists, have worked on for their entire careers.
“It’s better to have loved and lost than not to have loved at all,” he says. “Obviously we theorists working on supersymmetry are playing for big stakes. We’re talking about dark matter, the origins of mass scales in physics, unifying the fundamental forces. You have to be realistic: if you are playing for big stakes, very possibly you’re not going to win.
Recently the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and its Mini-Me partner in the legislature, the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), have been arguing that construction of chip fabs in the US by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) is little more than stripping Taiwan of its assets. For example, KMT Deputy Secretary-General Lin Pei-hsiang (林沛祥) in January said that “This is not ‘reciprocal cooperation’ ... but a substantial hollowing out of our country.” Similarly, former TPP Chair Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) contended it constitutes “selling Taiwan out to the United States.” The two pro-China parties are proposing a bill that would limit semiconductor
Institutions signalling a fresh beginning and new spirit often adopt new slogans, symbols and marketing materials, and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is no exception. Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), soon after taking office as KMT chair, released a new slogan that plays on the party’s acronym: “Kind Mindfulness Team.” The party recently released a graphic prominently featuring the red, white and blue of the flag with a Chinese slogan “establishing peace, blessings and fortune marching forth” (締造和平,幸福前行). One part of the graphic also features two hands in blue and white grasping olive branches in a stylized shape of Taiwan. Bonus points for
March 9 to March 15 “This land produced no horses,” Qing Dynasty envoy Yu Yung-ho (郁永河) observed when he visited Taiwan in 1697. He didn’t mean that there were no horses at all; it was just difficult to transport them across the sea and raise them in the hot and humid climate. “Although 10,000 soldiers were stationed here, the camps had fewer than 1,000 horses,” Yu added. Starting from the Dutch in the 1600s, each foreign regime brought horses to Taiwan. But they remained rare animals, typically only owned by the government or
“M yeolgong jajangmyeon (anti-communism zhajiangmian, 滅共炸醬麵), let’s all shout together — myeolgong!” a chef at a Chinese restaurant in Dongtan, located about 35km south of Seoul, South Korea, calls out before serving a bowl of Korean-style zhajiangmian —black bean noodles. Diners repeat the phrase before tucking in. This political-themed restaurant, named Myeolgong Banjeom (滅共飯館, “anti-communism restaurant”), is operated by a single person and does not take reservations; therefore long queues form regularly outside, and most customers appear sympathetic to its political theme. Photos of conservative public figures hang on the walls, alongside political slogans and poems written in Chinese characters; South
RSS