The last time I voluntarily wore sunglasses to watch television, I was an eight-year-old fan of Michael J Fox, committed for reasons long forgotten to watching films from the actor’s cool-dude period — Back to the Future, Teen Wolf — through plasticky, wraparound shades.
Those sunglasses probably had a street value of around US$0.50; the pair I am wearing today, to test Samsung’s latest hi-tech television at the company’s headquarters in Surrey, south of London, cost about US$120, have a power socket in one arm, an infrared sensor on the bridge — and allow me to watch images on Samsung’s new TV in 3D. My eight-year-old self would have traded in an instant.
On sale from this week, the 55-inch set is the first in a wave of 3D televisions that are hitting the market. Panasonic’s version swiftly joined Samsung’s, with models from LG and Sony expected to follow in the summer. The industry hope is consumers, many of whom have only just made the costly upgrade to high-definition TVs, will want to ratchet up their home entertainment options once more and shift to a TV that costs about US$1,800 for the lowest specification. (And that’s without factoring a 3D-equipped player to watch Blu-ray films). It is a big ask, but one Samsung and its rivals hope will be off-set by the “wow” factor of 3D which impressed those who saw Avatar in the cinema and spent 160 minutes pawing at colorful objects that weren’t there.
“Avatar has really kicked things on; got everyone in the groove,” says Darren Petersen, a television expert at Samsung HQ. “But as for how 3D looks in the home, it can’t really be explained. You have to see it for yourself.” So we are doing just that, in the Surrey showroom, wearing special glasses to watch Monsters vs Aliens. It is an animated film about a giant-sized superhero, voiced by Reese Witherspoon, who is laying waste to the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco. Pieces of the bridge seem to fall out of the screen. An alien villain points a ray-gun at us — it pokes right out and follows me to the left or right as I move about the room.
Kids will love this. The next footage is of the floating, leather-jacketed torso of director James Cameron, speaking to a crowd in Times Square in New York. This is taken from the US launch of the TV, Cameron giving a glowing speech about 3D technology to a crowd of raving electronics fans.
I’m quite impressed. Can I see more?
This, the team at Samsung concedes, is a bit of a problem — there isn’t much more. Footage of players at the London soccer club Chelsea having a kickabout will be available in time for a planned road show, showing off the TV around the UK. Early buyers, it seems, will really have to like Monsters vs Aliens, which they’ll be watching on loop until another animated film, Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs, is released in the UK in June.
The UK satellite broadcaster Sky plans to launch a dedicated 3D channel at about the same time, but the broadcaster admits it’s taking a while to get going because “there’s not a seam of 3D content we can tap in to at the moment.”
Parts of the World Cup in South Africa will be filmed in 3D, but the BBC and ITV are unlikely to be ready to broadcast them. Not even Cameron, chief cheerleader of 3D media, has stepped up: the recent Blu-ray release of Avatar was 2D only and distributor Fox has no fixed date for the release of a 3D version.
The Samsung team buzzes about excitedly and I am told to leave my 3D specs on. Darren calls up a menu screen and turns on a mode called “2D to 3D.” We watch random clips from normal television — break-dancers performing on a stage, highlights from an Arsenal match — that have been processed by the TV to appear three dimensional. In theory, I could plug in one of those 25-year-old Michael J Fox films and watch it as if it had been filmed by Cameron with his special Avatar cameras.
In reality? The results are pretty variable — at times impressive, as when a dancer sticks a spinning leg in my face, at times ropey and disorienting, as when a soccer goalkeeper has a shoulder that floats centimeters in front of his neck. It’s only a stop-gap option, but after just a few minutes I’m keen to go back to the crispness of a cartoon character wrecking the US.
Another looming problem for 3D TV is which glasses will prevail as the industry standard. It’s one of those tiresome format battles at which the home entertainment industry excels — this time between cheaper “passive” glasses, the kind handed out in cinemas, and gizmo-riddled “active” glasses.
The active glasses receive information from the TV through an infra-red sensor, telling them rapidly to block one eye, then the other in time with alternating frames on the screen, tricking the brain in to seeing a 3D image; the passive glasses are simpler, with polarized but unchanging lenses that create an effect (in theory) less refined. Which will prevail as the industry standard? Samsung, Panasonic and Sony endorse active, LG passive, while Sky says it is “agnostic” and that its service will work on both. My instinct is to wonder about the family of four gathered around the set to watch a blockbuster, or the gang of pals squeezed on to a sofa for the football, and whether it’s realistic for each to need pricey specs of their own.
“I love to be ahead of my friends,” said Matt Rajah, the first customer in line to buy this TV when it went on sale at the UK’s John Lewis department stores, offering one of the few plausible reasons for buying a technology that’s so new and unpredictable. 3D TV might be an advance that transforms your living room, like flat screens, but it could prove to be an impractical flop and leave early adopters with much cumbersome eyewear.
For now, I’m ready to go back to watching television in the way I have ever since the magic of Teen Wolf diminished. Sunglasses off.
The Lee (李) family migrated to Taiwan in trickles many decades ago. Born in Myanmar, they are ethnically Chinese and their first language is Yunnanese, from China’s Yunnan Province. Today, they run a cozy little restaurant in Taipei’s student stomping ground, near National Taiwan University (NTU), serving up a daily pre-selected menu that pays homage to their blended Yunnan-Burmese heritage, where lemongrass and curry leaves sit beside century egg and pickled woodear mushrooms. Wu Yun (巫雲) is more akin to a family home that has set up tables and chairs and welcomed strangers to cozy up and share a meal
Dec. 8 to Dec. 14 Chang-Lee Te-ho (張李德和) had her father’s words etched into stone as her personal motto: “Even as a woman, you should master at least one art.” She went on to excel in seven — classical poetry, lyrical poetry, calligraphy, painting, music, chess and embroidery — and was also a respected educator, charity organizer and provincial assemblywoman. Among her many monikers was “Poetry Mother” (詩媽). While her father Lee Chao-yuan’s (李昭元) phrasing reflected the social norms of the 1890s, it was relatively progressive for the time. He personally taught Chang-Lee the Chinese classics until she entered public
Last week writer Wei Lingling (魏玲靈) unloaded a remarkably conventional pro-China column in the Wall Street Journal (“From Bush’s Rebuke to Trump’s Whisper: Navigating a Geopolitical Flashpoint,” Dec 2, 2025). Wei alleged that in a phone call, US President Donald Trump advised Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi not to provoke the People’s Republic of China (PRC) over Taiwan. Wei’s claim was categorically denied by Japanese government sources. Trump’s call to Takaichi, Wei said, was just like the moment in 2003 when former US president George Bush stood next to former Chinese premier Wen Jia-bao (溫家寶) and criticized former president Chen
President William Lai (賴清德) has proposed a NT$1.25 trillion (US$40 billion) special eight-year budget that intends to bolster Taiwan’s national defense, with a “T-Dome” plan to create “an unassailable Taiwan, safeguarded by innovation and technology” as its centerpiece. This is an interesting test for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), and how they handle it will likely provide some answers as to where the party currently stands. Naturally, the Lai administration and his Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) are for it, as are the Americans. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is not. The interests and agendas of those three are clear, but
RSS