href="http://www.taipeitimes.com/images/2008/11/04/T T-971104-P16-IB.pdf">VIEW THIS PAGE
When Kimberly Haven votes in her first-ever presidential election today, she says it will be a gut-wrenching experience. She doesn’t take her right to vote for granted, because it was snatched from her when she was convicted for a felony.
An estimated 5.3 million Americans — a staggering one in 40 adults — are not allowed to vote because of criminal convictions. This includes 2.1 million ex-offenders who have completed their sentence and are free. US state laws on disenfranchisement vary widely, but the issue has come under public scrutiny given the soaring nationwide rate of incarceration and the close presidential election of 2000.
The election eight years ago was decided by 537 votes in Florida. At that time there were an estimated 960,000 ex-felons in the state, who had completed their sentence and did not have the right to vote, according to the Sentencing Project, a Washington-based advocacy group.
Florida’s law was changed last year under Governor Charlie Crist, restoring voting rights for those who had served non-violent felony convictions. An estimated 115,000 ex-felons will be eligible to vote.
Haven says July 2, last year is her independence day because that’s when she registered to vote for the first time after coming home from prison six years before.
In April last year, Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley signed legislation ending the state’s lifetime voting ban and giving back voting rights to more than 50,000 residents. Haven was the state’s first newly re-enfranchised former felon to exercise her right to vote in civic polls.
“I didn’t realize the importance or the power of the right to vote until it was taken away from me,” Haven, 47, said, adding that she hadn’t voted before. “It’s going to be a very emotional experience for me ... I know I will cry. It’s surreal because I know how hard-fought this has been for me.”
Haven has struggled to regain what she calls not just a privilege, but a basic right for thousands like her who have paid their debt to society. She is now the executive director of Justice Maryland, an advocacy group that has a voter re-enfranchisement campaign — Maryland, Got Democracy.
“The right to vote has nothing to do with the criminal justice system. It has to do with the power of democracy and civic engagement and participation,” she said.
Currently, 48 states prohibit prisoners from voting while incarcerated for a felony offence. Only two states — Maine and Vermont — permit inmates to vote.
“Nobody in the rest of the world has policies like us. We are considered a beacon of democracy, and yet we have the most restrictive voting rights,” Ryan King, policy analyst at the Sentencing Project, said.
The US incarcerates more than 2 million people, a rate that is five to eight times more than in other developed nations. Criminal justice experts say that 1.4 million black men are disenfranchised, a rate that is seven times the national average.
The American Civil Liberties Union says the US is out of step with the rest of the world, as many democracies allow inmates to vote, and it is very rare for anyone who is not in prison to lose their right to vote.
But disenfranchisement is only part of the story. In this election, several hundred thousand ex-felons could lose their vote even in states where they can vote, because election officials are poorly informed of their state’s felony disenfranchisement policies, according to New York University Law School’s Brennan Center for Justice.
Since 1997, at least 16 states, including battleground states such as Pennsylvania, have reformed their felon voting laws, but there is little coordination between election offices and the criminal justice system, which could cause confusion on election day.
Andres Idarraga says that voting is the most significant form of political expression in a democracy. In 1998, at age 20, he was convicted as a cocaine dealer. He had never cast a vote before then.
When he was released in 2004, he discovered that under Rhode Island law he would not be eligible to vote until age 58. He joined the state’s Right to Vote campaign and helped organize residents to approve a referendum that restored voting rights to released convicts.
Determined to turn his life around, Idarraga graduated from Brown University with degrees in economics and literature, and started at Yale Law School this fall. He voted for the first time in the primaries and was excited about exercising his franchise in the presidential elections.
Felony disenfranchisement is a controversial issue and hasn’t featured in the presidential campaigns — even though they could benefit from the new voter pool — because neither side wants to appear to be soft on crime, activists say.
href="http://www.taipeitimes.com/images/2008/11/04/T T-971104-P16-IB.pdf">VIEW THIS PAGE
Nothing like the spectacular, dramatic unraveling of a political party in Taiwan has unfolded before as has hit the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) over recent weeks. The meltdown of the New Power Party (NPP) and the self-implosion of the New Party (NP) were nothing compared to the drama playing out now involving the TPP. This ongoing saga is so interesting, this is the fifth straight column on the subject. To catch up on this train wreck of a story up to Aug. 20, search for “Donovan’s Deep Dives Ko Wen-je” in a search engine. ANN KAO SENTENCED TO PRISON YET AGAIN,
Despite her well-paying tech job, Li Daijing didn’t hesitate when her cousin asked for help running a restaurant in Mexico City. She packed up and left China for the Mexican capital last year, with dreams of a new adventure. The 30-year-old woman from Chengdu, the Sichuan provincial capital, hopes one day to start an online business importing furniture from her home country. “I want more,” Li said. “I want to be a strong woman. I want independence.” Li is among a new wave of Chinese migrants who are leaving their country in search of opportunities, more freedom or better financial prospects at a
When the Dutch began interacting with the indigenous people of Taiwan, they found that their hunters classified deer hide quality for trade using the Portuguese terms for “head,” “belly,” and “foot.” The Portuguese must have stopped here more than once to trade, but those visits have all been lost to history. They already had a colony on Macao, and did not need Taiwan to gain access to southern China or to the trade corridor that connected Japan with Manila. They were, however, the last to look at Taiwan that way. The geostrategic relationship between Taiwan and the Philippines was established
Sept. 9 to Sept. 15 The upgrading of sugarcane processing equipment at Ciaozaitou Sugar Factory (橋仔頭) in 1904 had an unintended but long-lasting impact on Taiwan’s transportation and rural development. The newly imported press machine more than doubled production, leading to an expansion of the factory’s fields beyond what its original handcarts and oxcarts could handle. In 1905, factory manager Tejiro Yamamoto headed to Hawaii to observe how sugarcane transportation was handled there. They had trouble finding something suitable for Taiwan until they discovered a 762mm-gauge “miniature” railroad at a small refinery in the island of Maui. On