More than 17 years after Iran's late spiritual leader Ruhollah Khomeini launched a fatwa against him, British writer Salman Rushdie remains firm in his criticism of fundamentalist sects of Islam, fearing they will make the West surrender its values.
“We're all living under a fatwa now,” the 60-year-old author, who is of Indian origin, declared in a long, open interview with the British daily The Independent.
“You can see the fatwa as the overture to 9/11,” he said last week.
PHOTO: AFP
“It's not a direct line. Maybe you could say it was not the same piece of music. But in some way it was a harbinger — a small thing before a big thing. The first crow, you know, flying across the sky.”
On February 14, 1989, Khomeini, the leader of the 1979 Islamic Revolution in Iran, condemned Rushdie to death following the publication of his book The Satanic Verses, judged to be blasphemous. In 1998, the Iranian government committed to not applying the fatwa, but various groups regularly affirm their intention to honor it.
“I've tried, quite hard, as an act of will, to put it behind me, because I don't want to carry that weight around,” he said of the religious decree which made him aware of his own “worthlessness” and for a long time led him to live a reclusive lifestyle in constant fear.
“The warring halves of the world — East and West — were also the warring halves of my soul,” said Rushdie, who was born to a wealthy Muslim family and educated in England.
Rushdie, who rejected Islam as a youth but whose grandfather, a fervent believer, remains “the model of tolerance,” does not hesitate to denounce religious fanaticism.
The radicalisation of Islam worries him. Last week he entered without hesitation the debate raging in Britain over the point of the veil, declaring that “veils suck”.
For him, the veil “is a way of taking power away from women”.
In his interview, he said he feared that “the good guys are losing the battle within Islam. There's no question. The Islam that now exists is not the Islam that I grew up with.”
He despairs that too many reasonable people decline to see the true nature of Islamic fundamentalists and instead consider terrorism as the just reward for the evils caused by the West.
“It's one thing to criticize the way in which the American government is behaving, or the British government, and I have a lot of criticisms of that -- in fact, nothing but criticisms,” he said.
“But it's another thing to fail to see that an enemy actually exists and is extremely serious about what he wishes to do.”
A solution to the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians will not bring about a change to the ambitions, he said.
“It's not what they want. What they want is to change the nature of human life on earth into the image of the Taliban.
“They do not represent the quest for human justice. That, I think, is one of the great mistakes of the left,” he said.
He said he was scared on September 11, 2001, while thinking: “It's a shame that 3,000 people had to die for something pretty obvious to get through people's heads.”
The United States is not the savior in the face of Islamic fundamentalism, in Rushdie's view, because he has “never seen great power as having a moral dimension”.
He fears that the West will, in 25 years, regret its “surrender” because “in the name of tolerance and acceptance, we tied our own hands and slit our own throats” — referring, for example, to the cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed that appeared in a Danish newspaper last year and which ignited fury in some parts of the Muslim world earlier this year.
“When people ask me how the West should adapt to Muslim sensitivities, I always say — the question is the wrong way round,” he said.
“The West should go on being itself. There is nothing wrong with the things that for hundreds of years have been acceptable — satire, irreverence, ridicule, even quite rude commentary — why the hell not?”
May 18 to May 24 Pastor Yang Hsu’s (楊煦) congregation was shocked upon seeing the land he chose to build his orphanage. It was surrounded by mountains on three sides, and the only way to access it was to cross a river by foot. The soil was poor due to runoff, and large rocks strewn across the plot prevented much from growing. In addition, there was no running water or electricity. But it was all Yang could afford. He and his Indigenous Atayal wife Lin Feng-ying (林鳳英) had already been caring for 24 orphans in their home, and they were in
On May 2, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫), at a meeting in support of Taipei city councilors at party headquarters, compared President William Lai (賴清德) to Hitler. Chu claimed that unlike any other democracy worldwide in history, no other leader was rooting out opposing parties like Lai and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). That his statements are wildly inaccurate was not the point. It was a rallying cry, not a history lesson. This was intentional to provoke the international diplomatic community into a response, which was promptly provided. Both the German and Israeli offices issued statements on Facebook
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday delivered an address marking the first anniversary of his presidency. In the speech, Lai affirmed Taiwan’s global role in technology, trade and security. He announced economic and national security initiatives, and emphasized democratic values and cross-party cooperation. The following is the full text of his speech: Yesterday, outside of Beida Elementary School in New Taipei City’s Sanxia District (三峽), there was a major traffic accident that, sadly, claimed several lives and resulted in multiple injuries. The Executive Yuan immediately formed a task force, and last night I personally visited the victims in hospital. Central government agencies and the
Australia’s ABC last week published a piece on the recall campaign. The article emphasized the divisions in Taiwanese society and blamed the recall for worsening them. It quotes a supporter of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) as saying “I’m 43 years old, born and raised here, and I’ve never seen the country this divided in my entire life.” Apparently, as an adult, she slept through the post-election violence in 2000 and 2004 by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), the veiled coup threats by the military when Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) became president, the 2006 Red Shirt protests against him ginned up by
RSS