The path to a portly tummy is paved with good intentions: empty promises of pre-work yoga, lunchtime running, evening gym sessions. Our homes are riddled with twice-worn swimming costumes, barely broken-in trainers and sports bras graying glumly at the bottom of the knicker drawer. We are united by its abandoned sportswear, common ambition to make it to the gym, and a collective excuse: “I didn't have time.”
If the government could raise a tax on this phrase, it would probably have enough cash to buy every single adult his or her own personal trainer.
Meanwhile, we try and make our own amends. Really, who needs shouty people in Lycra when there are desk-squats, stair-climbs and walking to the shop to fit into a busy morning?
Don't pretend you don't understand what I'm on about. All those attempts to make up for our gym slackness: running up escalators, doing a bit of Pilates-lite while lying in front of the TV, two hours enthusiastic disco dancing at that wedding last weekend (which got especially high-impact when Wham! came on).
The problem is, none of us really knows if all this covert exercise action is having any effect. We have no ammunition when our binge-exercising colleagues belittle our efforts and scoff at our brags of extra-curricular ambling. Surely, every little helps?
raising the bar
Asker Jeukendrup, professor of exercise metabolism at Birmingham University, England, has some cheering news. “It all depends on what your goal is,” he says. “To get the health benefits, there is no need to do sport or go to the gym, just being physically active is enough.”
But, it transpires, there's active, and there's active. “Millions of years ago,” says Jeukendrup, “humans' physical activity levels were really high. Now we think activity, like the Tour de France, is totally extreme. But then, it would have been normal.”
So while the average office worker burns about 2,300 calories a day, our ancestors would have been using around 5,500. You are unlikely to make up the difference by getting off the bus a couple of stops early. Or even 4km early.
Thankfully, Jeukendrup reckons office workers only need to up their daily energy expenditure by 500 calories: “That's probably an hour's worth of walking. But you could do half-an-hour of walking, and then be more physically active, instead of sitting down and watching television.”
Doesn't sound too grueling, does it?
Ken Fox, professor of exercise and health sciences at Bristol University, England, says: “We are not in trouble because people aren't going to the gym and playing sport — the reason we're in trouble, is we've stopped being active in our general routines.”
Almost any movement is helpful — and for those of us with rather more than our fair share of tummy, walking is one of the best things we can do as it uses our own body weight.
But while that means a stroll round the shops can be good for you — although a brisk trot would be far more beneficial — you have not necessarily “earned” that piece of cake and glass of wine at the end of an exhausting afternoon. “It is dangerous if the reason you are increasing your activity is for energy balance,” says Fox. “You can overestimate how much activity you've done, and underestimate how much you've eaten. The equation is always unbalanced — it gets biased towards what people want to hear.”
Damn those exercise boffins, always trampling on our fitness plans. “We should be building exercise into our lives, and accepting it as part of our daily routine,” Fox says.
Steady as you go
You don't need to do it all at once — 10-minute bursts of activity are effective too. Half-an-hour of digging or shoveling in the garden can burn 250 calories, with 105 for weeding and 100 for raking. Moderate vacuuming, or mopping, will burn 160 calories an hour. Even clothes shopping is good exercise, especially when trying on different outfits — you can expect to burn around 100 calories an hour; 20 to 25 minutes washing and waxing the car can also dispose of 100. You'll also improve flexibility and upper body strength. And, of course, there's sex — half-an-hour of which can use up 120 to 180 calories. Kerry McCloskey, who wrote a book on the subject, claims she sometimes even clears the 350 calorie mark. “This is roughly the equivalent of briskly walking, running, or lifting weights for 30 minutes,” she says.
But you do need to keep these things in check. Two hours of dancing on a Saturday night after downing your own body weight in booze, will not give you the figure of a dancer. Lucy Banfield is a member of the ensemble for the London show, Dirty Dancing — and if you want be as fit as she is, you'll have to work hard. “When we're rehearsing we usually start at 10am and finish at 6pm. It will be learning a new dance and going over it again, and again, so rehearsing can be harder than doing a show,” she says. Even when she's performing in the evening, Banfield will attend dance classes and keep up with her Pilates.
So while it is perfectly possible to stay healthy and fit, without ever having to enter a gym — so long as you actually do walk to work, rather than just thinking about it — we shouldn't start closing down fitness centers quite yet. For a start, if you're looking to improve muscle tone, or add bulk, using specific gym equipment will be the most effective way. Second, the reason why we joined in the first place — to force ourselves to exercise more — is still an important factor. “At the gym there are more performance markers, so you can see your improvement because you can do something for longer, or do it better,” says Jeukendrup. “It's a way of motivating yourself.”
Signs of improvement are not so obvious in everyday life. Many sports scientists are reluctant to give average calorie-burning statistics on, say, vacuuming, as they differ wildly according to each person.
Be reassured, however, that panting up and down the office stairs — 15 to 20 minutes = around 100 calories — bottle of water in each hand, is in no way a waste of time.
See you in the top-floor meeting room for some quick star jumps.
It is barely 10am and the queue outside Onigiri Bongo already stretches around the block. Some of the 30 or so early-bird diners sit on stools, sipping green tea and poring over laminated menus. Further back it is standing-room only. “It’s always like this,” says Yumiko Ukon, who has run this modest rice ball shop and restaurant in the Otsuka neighbourhood of Tokyo for almost half a century. “But we never run out of rice,” she adds, seated in her office near a wall clock in the shape of a rice ball with a bite taken out. Bongo, opened in 1960 by
Common sense is not that common: a recent study from the University of Pennsylvania concludes the concept is “somewhat illusory.” Researchers collected statements from various sources that had been described as “common sense” and put them to test subjects. The mixed bag of results suggested there was “little evidence that more than a small fraction of beliefs is common to more than a small fraction of people.” It’s no surprise that there are few universally shared notions of what stands to reason. People took a horse worming drug to cure COVID! They think low-traffic neighborhoods are a communist plot and call
The sprawling port city of Kaohsiung seldom wins plaudits for its beauty or architectural history. That said, like any other metropolis of its size, it does have a number of strange or striking buildings. This article describes a few such curiosities, all but one of which I stumbled across by accident. BOMBPROOF HANGARS Just north of Kaohsiung International Airport, hidden among houses and small apartment buildings that look as though they were built between 15 and 30 years ago, are two mysterious bunker-like structures that date from the airport’s establishment as a Japanese base during World War II. Each is just about
Over the years, whole libraries of pro-People’s Republic of China (PRC) texts have been issued by commentators on “the Taiwan problem,” or the PRC’s desire to annex Taiwan. These documents have a number of features in common. They isolate Taiwan from other areas and issues of PRC expansion. They blame Taiwan’s rhetoric or behavior for PRC actions, particularly pro-Taiwan leadership and behavior. They present the brutal authoritarian state across the Taiwan Strait as conciliatory and rational. Even their historical frames are PRC propaganda. All of this, and more, colors the latest “analysis” and recommendations from the International Crisis Group, “The Widening
RSS