Masks have been important since the very earliest societies used them in religious ritual and as a way for humans to represent the gods. They have been made of every conceivable material from wood to iron and have represented anything from angry warrior gods to laughing clown faces. Why Miaoli County has sought to distinguish itself in the lineup of tourism-oriented festivals with masks is something of a mystery -- it has no particular tradition of mask use -- but, be that as it may, the 2003 Miaoli International Mask Festival will bring together 300 masks from 40 countries for display at the Aboriginal Resident Cultural Study Center ("
The Miaoli International Mask Festival, which got off the ground back in 1999, is one of many such events fostered by county governments and Taiwan's tourism authorities to help boost tourism around the island. One of the most successful has been the Ilan International Children's Folk Lore and Folk Games Festival (國際童玩藝術節), while others, such as Taitung's Festival of Australasian Cultures (南島文化節) and Kenting's totally bogus Wind Bell Festival (風鈴季) have been less of a draw for domestic tourists.
Miaoli's event, possibly due to the relative ease of access from Taipei, has proved successful at drawing the crowds. While the importance of masks in normal society has dwindled, their appeal for children has never been in doubt, and the festival offers ample opportunity for parents to entertain their offspring with DIY mask-making activities and various types of competitions.
In traditional society, masks where a means of establishing or altering social status, and in the domestic tourism stakes, Miaoli has everything to gain and almost nothing to lose by changing its status. While the exhibition itself is likely to draw people of diverse interests, providing something for those seriously interested in learning more about these potent symbols as well as those simply out for a good time, the masks seem very much an excuse for the usual plethora of folk dancing troupes and cultural activities that are so much part of these events.
In this instance, eight foreign dancing troupes have been brought in, only one of which has anything at all to do with masks -- this is the Sagarmatha Nepal Cultural Group, which will be performing on Sunday and throughout the festival, along with the Latvia Folkdance Group, the Moldovenesca Folk Music and Dance Ensemble, and Kazan, a folk troupe from the Republic of Tatarstan.
Also performing will be the Danish Folkdance Group, Aald Hielpen, a Dutch folkdance group, the India Rang Puhar Dance Group and Gehem from Turkey. While all these groups doubtless have their appeal for fanciers of folk dancing, it seems a pity that the organizers could not make more of an effort to adhere to the theme of the event, bringing in a more diverse range of performers who use masks in their performances.
But then, of course, one is inclined to feel that masks play second fiddle to the chance of promoting local tourism services. See the masks by all means, but don't forget to check out the local kiln -- DIY pottery is another way of keeping the kids occupied -- tourist farms, restaurants and resorts.
While considerable effort has been expended in putting together materials discussing the importance of masks from early society to contemporary theater, no local group that uses masks, and there are more than a few, will be a participant in the event. Although White Dance Temple (白舞寺) is discussed in the heavy academic literature that is available about the exhibition, they will not perform, despite being local and much more representative of what masks are all about than Dutch folk singers, no matter how talented.
But this sour-faced carping can be put behind a good-humored mask which might go with a shrug of the shoulders as we take advantage of the many performances that the festival will offer.
More Information: The Miaoli International Mask Festival will start tomorrow and run until April 27. Detailed information on performance schedules can be found at www.mask.org.tw.
April 28 to May 4 During the Japanese colonial era, a city’s “first” high school typically served Japanese students, while Taiwanese attended the “second” high school. Only in Taichung was this reversed. That’s because when Taichung First High School opened its doors on May 1, 1915 to serve Taiwanese students who were previously barred from secondary education, it was the only high school in town. Former principal Hideo Azukisawa threatened to quit when the government in 1922 attempted to transfer the “first” designation to a new local high school for Japanese students, leading to this unusual situation. Prior to the Taichung First
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) hatched a bold plan to charge forward and seize the initiative when he held a protest in front of the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office. Though risky, because illegal, its success would help tackle at least six problems facing both himself and the KMT. What he did not see coming was Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (將萬安) tripping him up out of the gate. In spite of Chu being the most consequential and successful KMT chairman since the early 2010s — arguably saving the party from financial ruin and restoring its electoral viability —
The Ministry of Education last month proposed a nationwide ban on mobile devices in schools, aiming to curb concerns over student phone addiction. Under the revised regulation, which will take effect in August, teachers and schools will be required to collect mobile devices — including phones, laptops and wearables devices — for safekeeping during school hours, unless they are being used for educational purposes. For Chang Fong-ching (張鳳琴), the ban will have a positive impact. “It’s a good move,” says the professor in the department of
Toward the outside edge of Taichung City, in Wufeng District (霧峰去), sits a sprawling collection of single-story buildings with tiled roofs belonging to the Wufeng Lin (霧峰林家) family, who rose to prominence through success in military, commercial, and artistic endeavors in the 19th century. Most of these buildings have brick walls and tiled roofs in the traditional reddish-brown color, but in the middle is one incongruous property with bright white walls and a black tiled roof: Yipu Garden (頤圃). Purists may scoff at the Japanese-style exterior and its radical departure from the Fujianese architectural style of the surrounding buildings. However, the property