In a big exhibition for Taiwan's best photo gallery, the Taiwan International Visual Arts Center (TIVAC), 40 prints of Imogen Cunningham photographs are now on display (and for sale). But only 37 of them are so-called originals. The rest are reprints from the original negatives reproduced by the Imogen Cunningham Trust, which is run by one of her sons.
The exhibition itself is certainly worthy. Born in 1883, Cunningham was a California housewife who constructed her own homemade darkroom and went on to become one of the more influential photographers of the American modern movement, men included. Her early work of the 1910s consisted of haloed, pastoral landscapes and dreamy, psychological portraits. There are ready comparisons to the French symbolists, Impressionist painting, the still embryonic concept of surrealism, and the work of photographer Edward Steichen.
But Cunningham is most famous for what came after, the flower forms that helped to build the modernist aesthetic. The flowers were plucked from her own garden, and when she photographed them in a purified atmosphere, the emphasis on form came out on par with that of subject. The most obvious comparison here is to her contemporary, Georgia O'Keefe, who pushed her floral forms further with visual metaphors both sexual and psychological.
PHOTO COURTESY OF TIVAC
Cunningham was also known for her nudes, which pursued similar modernist concerns with pure forms, though she did not achieve as much there as with her flowers, and will always be remembered behind Edward Weston as the great abstractor of the nude female.
Rounding out the art with a historical perspective, the exhibition also includes some very interesting portraits, including four of famous photographers -- Weston, Man Ray, Alfred Steiglitz and a very manic looking Ansel Adams -- and three Cunningham self-portraits from 1913, 1958 and 1974 -- two years before her death.
The prints of these old negatives on display at TIVAC -- especially the florals -- are beautiful, large-scale silver gelatin prints that may even be larger and more exactingly printed than the originals. Almost all these reprints were made in the 1990s, and they come with mattes embossed with a fake-looking Imogen Cunningham signature and an official Chinese seal.
This practice raises certain questions of authenticity and value. The three originals come with a pedigree attested to by the Cunningham Trust that they are absolutely authentic. The most expensive of these costs NT$1.1 million. The reprints list prices alongside statements of limitations on additional reprints per year, with the number usually between five and 20.
These cost between NT$45,000 and in the case of one exceptionally famous image, Magnolia Blossom, The Tower of Jewels, NT$550,000.
For buyers looking at these "authentic" reprints, an important question is: how many "authentic" prints are already out there, and how does this affect the value of what is for sale here? Absolute transparency would solve this problem, but the art market is seldom transparent, especially in Taipei, which is not well integrated with New York, Paris and London.
Previously, Japan established itself as an art market of inflated value, and now Taiwan seems that it may be doing the same. The goal is to appropriate authenticity rather than create it, which is pretty normal for a culture of new money and a newly developed cultural sense. But how much will this process cost? That depends on how savvy the buyers are, or how badly they want to prove their newfound status. Either way, the Cunningham prints sure are beautiful.
TIVAC is located in Taipei at 29, Lane 45 Liaoning St. (
It is barely 10am and the queue outside Onigiri Bongo already stretches around the block. Some of the 30 or so early-bird diners sit on stools, sipping green tea and poring over laminated menus. Further back it is standing-room only. “It’s always like this,” says Yumiko Ukon, who has run this modest rice ball shop and restaurant in the Otsuka neighbourhood of Tokyo for almost half a century. “But we never run out of rice,” she adds, seated in her office near a wall clock in the shape of a rice ball with a bite taken out. Bongo, opened in 1960 by
Common sense is not that common: a recent study from the University of Pennsylvania concludes the concept is “somewhat illusory.” Researchers collected statements from various sources that had been described as “common sense” and put them to test subjects. The mixed bag of results suggested there was “little evidence that more than a small fraction of beliefs is common to more than a small fraction of people.” It’s no surprise that there are few universally shared notions of what stands to reason. People took a horse worming drug to cure COVID! They think low-traffic neighborhoods are a communist plot and call
The sprawling port city of Kaohsiung seldom wins plaudits for its beauty or architectural history. That said, like any other metropolis of its size, it does have a number of strange or striking buildings. This article describes a few such curiosities, all but one of which I stumbled across by accident. BOMBPROOF HANGARS Just north of Kaohsiung International Airport, hidden among houses and small apartment buildings that look as though they were built between 15 and 30 years ago, are two mysterious bunker-like structures that date from the airport’s establishment as a Japanese base during World War II. Each is just about
Taiwan, once relegated to the backwaters of international news media and viewed as a subset topic of “greater China,” is now a hot topic. Words associated with Taiwan include “invasion,” “contingency” and, on the more cheerful side, “semiconductors” and “tourism.” It is worth noting that while Taiwanese companies play important roles in the semiconductor industry, there is no such thing as a “Taiwan semiconductor” or a “Taiwan chip.” If crucial suppliers are included, the supply chain is in the thousands and spans the globe. Both of the variants of the so-called “silicon shield” are pure fantasy. There are four primary drivers
RSS