The Internet was supposed to kill off books, but across much of Asia, a booming market tells a different story.
The region does not have a special affinity with reading. Demand is being driven by something more practical: a desire to get ahead. It is also underpinned by rising literacy, an expanding middle class and the wider adoption of English as a second language. Textbooks, exam preparation materials and self-help titles are among the bestsellers. Promoted by social media, and in some cases encouraged by political leaders, books are not just a pastime — they are tools for economic advancement.
Other countries struggling with weakening reading levels should take note. In much of Asia, reading is reinforced by education systems, politicians and personal ambition. That helps explain why books have proved more resilient here than in some other parts of the world. Reading does not survive just because people love books — it survives when systems make it necessary.
Illustration: Mountain People
While that is depressing for those of us who read for pleasure, the data show that the strategy is working. Asia-Pacific region is now the world’s largest publishing market, generating an estimated US$400 billion to US$420 billion in combined print and digital revenues in 2024, fresh figures from the International Federation of Reproduction Rights Organizations (IFRRO) show. The region is forecast to expand 8 to 10 percent annually through 2030, more than double global growth rates. Even as newspapers and magazines decline, books remain resilient, making up about 60 percent of traditional publishing revenues.
The contrast with Western markets is stark. The US publishing industry generated about US$32 billion in revenue in 2023 to 2024, and the UK about US$9 billion. Europe and North America together now represent less than one-quarter of global publishing revenues on a comparable basis.
Literary festivals across India and Southeast Asia are helping to boost interest, while physical books have quietly become status symbols in some circles, even in this digital age.
India is the clearest example of how much potential there still is. The publishing market is estimated at more than US$11 billion and is projected to grow strongly through the end of the decade, the IFRRO says.
The country is also the world’s second-largest market for English-language books, although literature in regional languages and dialects is also flourishing. Global hits such as Arundhati Roy’s memoir Mother Mary Comes to Me — recently shortlisted for the Women’s Prize for Nonfiction — and Geetanjali Shree’s Tomb of Sand (which won the 2022 International Booker Prize) show the appetite for Indian literature is strong, even beyond the region.
China shows how state policy can shape reading habits. Its publishing market, estimated at more than US$200 billion, dwarfs others. The Chinese government has made reading a policy priority by introducing regulations to promote it, expanded reading spaces and launched nationwide campaigns. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) wants China to become a cultural powerhouse by 2035. Books are a part of that — even if what people read remains tightly controlled.
Social media, often blamed for the decline of books in other parts of the world, is helping to amplify the habit. Douyin, China’s version of TikTok, has become a major channel for book discovery and sales, integrating e-commerce directly into its platform. Influencers and livestreamers promote titles to millions of viewers. “BookTok” in countries such Australia, the US and UK often focuses on young adult and genre fiction, but those sold on Chinese platforms span a much wider range, including educational titles and self-help works.
It is encouraging that this is happening in large economies such as China and in emerging markets with historically strong reading cultures such as India, but this is by no means the end of the story. Surveys suggest that on average, Asians read fewer books than their counterparts in the West. In fact, India is the only Asian nation that makes it to a top six list of countries that read the most per capita and that statistic likely reflects only the habits of the middle and upper classes.
Embedding reading more firmly in education systems, the way that Asia’s enormous school and university systems have done, could help to generate a steadier demand. Measures such as Xi’s top-down directive, prioritizing reading in education policy and viewing digital platforms as partners in the marketing and sales, could also help.
Governments must act to build on the steady progress. Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財) set a good example for this year’s World Book Day when he took to social media to talk about how reading had shaped his life. More politicians should follow suit.
Despite remarkable progress, the region is home to about 46 percent of the world’s illiterate young people and 61 percent of illiterate adults. Boosting literacy levels, especially in less developed parts where access to books and education remains scandalously low, is a priority.
Reading forms critical thinking that helps our societies advance, innovate and, indeed, govern. It remains one of life’s deepest sources of intellectual and personal enrichment, as your columnist can attest. If that habit fades in the next generation, the loss would be felt not just in our culture, but in how all of us think and act.
That would be a bleak ending indeed.
Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China. Previously, she was the BBC’s lead Asia presenter and worked for the BBC across the continent for two decades. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic