Unity is the only way
The first thing that came to my mind after reading the news about the new special defense budget is that some Taiwanese are starting to argue that President William Lai (賴清德) has declared war on China or that “this brings us to a dangerous situation.”
I do not consider myself as having any particular political stance, but I care about most issues that concern Taiwan, and I really hate to see political parties and their supporters fight with one another.
It is only right that the opposition provides checks and balances on the ruling party, especially in a two-party system like ours. However, it seems that many Taiwanese support their party over policies, and any debate descends into personal attacks.
The phenomenon might discourage those who really want to discuss the policies, because no one wants to be called a “blue bird” or “little grass” when they are seriously talking about national issues.
Taiwanese should be more focused on what is being done, not who is doing it, and discuss any issues without preconceived ideas.
In these dangerous times, if Taiwanese keep attacking one another over our respective political stances, the situation will only get worse.
I believe that everyone’s original intention is to be concerned about Taiwan; that is why we should maintain a rational discussion. Unity is the best weapon and shield to protect ourselves, perhaps even more useful than the budget.
National fragmentation due to political differences is what our enemies want.
Zhao Jia-heng
Kaohsiung
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
More than a week after Hondurans voted, the country still does not know who will be its next president. The Honduran National Electoral Council has not declared a winner, and the transmission of results has experienced repeated malfunctions that interrupted updates for almost 24 hours at times. The delay has become the second-longest post-electoral silence since the election of former Honduran president Juan Orlando Hernandez of the National Party in 2017, which was tainted by accusations of fraud. Once again, this has raised concerns among observers, civil society groups and the international community. The preliminary results remain close, but both
Beijing’s diplomatic tightening with Jakarta is not an isolated episode; it is a piece of a long-term strategy that realigns the prices of choices across the Indo-Pacific. The principle is simple. There is no need to impose an alliance if one can make a given trajectory convenient and the alternative costly. By tying Indonesia’s modernization to capital, technology and logistics corridors, and by obtaining in public the reaffirmation of the “one China” principle, Beijing builds a constraint that can be activated tomorrow on sensitive issues. The most sensitive is Taiwan. If we look at systemic constraints, the question is not whether