Wall Street’s big guns are early this month to head to Hong Kong for a global financial summit, dining at the Hong Kong Palace Museum (featuring Chinese imperial works on loan from Beijing) before meeting at the nearby Rosewood Hotel — one of the city’s swankiest. There, the top brass from Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan and another 100 financial firms would enjoy delicious food and breathtaking views as Hong Kong’s leaders pitch them on the profits to be made in the former British colony.
The same day as the gala dinner, a very different type of gathering would take place in Hong Kong. Veteran political activist Chow Hang-tung (鄒幸彤) would try to quash national security proceedings against her. She is scheduled to stand trial in January, along with Lee Cheuk-yan (李卓人) and Albert Ho (何俊仁), for their role in organizing annual commemorations of the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre — an event that drew hundreds of thousands of people every June 4 until 2019. Chow and Lee have been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize, and Ho is a well-known lawyer in Hong Kong. They now face 10 years in prison on subversion charges, simply for urging Hong Kongers to light candles in honor of the hundreds, perhaps thousands, of Chinese protesters who were killed by their own government. These were the only public commemorations of the massacre held on Chinese soil, and for three decades, they were legal.
Chow, Lee and Ho are just three of almost 800 political prisoners held in the once-free city. The most prominent is 77-year-old pro-democracy publisher Jimmy Lai (黎智英). Having been held in solitary confinement for most of the past five years, he soon faces a verdict in his marathon national security trial. Six of his Apple Daily colleagues remain in custody, and although they have pleaded guilty, the courts have not yet sentenced them. The authorities prefer to hold them hostage pending the conclusion of proceedings against Lai.
Most Hong Kongers now feel the chill of Beijing’s long shadow. Charges still hang over many of the more than 10,000 people arrested during the massive protests of 2019 to 2020, when as many as 2 million people flooded the streets demanding democracy.
It is telling that Hong Kong Chief Executive John Lee (李家超) cannot even open a bank account at most of the banks whose leaders are attending the upcoming summit. Under US sanctions for his role in the crackdown on Hong Kong’s pro-democracy demonstrators, he was even humiliatingly denied a visa to attend the 2023 APEC summit in San Francisco. Yet now, financiers who cannot bank Lee would shake his hand and listen to his remarks at the Rosewood.
The Hong Kong government wants to convince these bankers that everything is back to normal. Its representatives would insist that the market is strong, with the benchmark Hang Seng Index up more than 30 percent year-to-date, and that Hong Kong would likely be the world’s largest market for initial public offerings this year.
By attending, the masters of global finance are signaling that they do not care that China broke its promise to the people of Hong Kong. They would prefer to forget that, under the treaty governing Hong Kong’s return to China after a century and a half of British rule, the Chinese government committed to maintaining the freedoms that Hong Kong had enjoyed. It even doubled down, promulgating a mini-constitution that upholds free speech, a free press, freedom of worship, trial by jury, the right to choose one’s own lawyer and the other guarantees of a free society. China has broken every promise.
One thing China does care about, of course, is profits. Hong Kong’s market has barely moved in the five years since China introduced its draconian National Security Law, which has been weaponized against Chow, Lee, Ho and Lai. Despite its strength this year, the Hang Seng remains about 3 percent above where it was when the law was introduced, whereas the S&P 500 has more than doubled.
This gap reflects the fact that if you have political prisoners, you cannot also be a global financial center. Political prisoners exist only where a free press does not, but the free flow of information is a prerequisite for price discovery. Likewise, when courts are politicized, property rights cannot be protected and many investors would stay away.
So, why are Western bankers showing up? The only conclusion is that they are chasing short-term profits, even if it means funding a repressive regime that has made no secret of its animosity toward the West. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) wants to upend the liberal world order, and he is betting that US financiers would help him fund that effort. Lee and his Chinese Communist Party bosses know that Wall Street is the soft underbelly of US capitalism.
If Western bankers insist on going, they should use the occasion to speak up. Otherwise, they should stay home.
Mark L. Clifford, president of the Committee for Freedom at the Hong Kong Foundation, is the author, most recently, of The Troublemaker: How Jimmy Lai Became a Billionaire, Hong Kong’s Greatest Dissident, and China’s Most Feared Critic.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
A Chinese diplomat’s violent threat against Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi following her remarks on defending Taiwan marks a dangerous escalation in East Asian tensions, revealing Beijing’s growing intolerance for dissent and the fragility of regional diplomacy. Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) on Saturday posted a chilling message on X: “the dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off,” in reference to Takaichi’s remark to Japanese lawmakers that an attack on Taiwan could threaten Japan’s survival. The post, which was later deleted, was not an isolated outburst. Xue has also amplified other incendiary messages, including one suggesting
Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) on Saturday last week shared a news article on social media about Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks on Taiwan, adding that “the dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off.” The previous day in the Japanese House of Representatives, Takaichi said that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could constitute “a situation threatening Japan’s survival,” a reference to a legal legal term introduced in 2015 that allows the prime minister to deploy the Japan Self-Defense Forces. The violent nature of Xue’s comments is notable in that it came from a diplomat,
China’s third aircraft carrier, the Fujian, entered service this week after a commissioning ceremony in China’s Hainan Province on Wednesday last week. Chinese state media reported that the Fujian would be deployed to the Taiwan Strait, the South China Sea and the western Pacific. It seemed that the Taiwan Strait being one of its priorities meant greater military pressure on Taiwan, but it would actually put the Fujian at greater risk of being compromised. If the carrier were to leave its home port of Sanya and sail to the East China Sea or the Yellow Sea, it would have to transit the
Before 1945, the most widely spoken language in Taiwan was Tai-gi (also known as Taiwanese, Taiwanese Hokkien or Hoklo). However, due to almost a century of language repression policies, many Taiwanese believe that Tai-gi is at risk of disappearing. To understand this crisis, I interviewed academics and activists about Taiwan’s history of language repression, the major challenges of revitalizing Tai-gi and their policy recommendations. Although Taiwanese were pressured to speak Japanese when Taiwan became a Japanese colony in 1895, most managed to keep their heritage languages alive in their homes. However, starting in 1949, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enacted martial law
RSS